Clicky

Leica M Typ 262 vs Sigma Quattro

Portability
77
Imaging
72
Features
35
Overall
57
Leica M Typ 262 front
 
Sigma sd Quattro front
Portability
63
Imaging
69
Features
56
Overall
63

Leica M Typ 262 vs Sigma Quattro Key Specs

Leica M Typ 262
(Full Review)
  • 24MP - Full frame Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 200 - 6400
  • Leica M Mount
  • 600g - 139 x 80 x 42mm
  • Launched November 2015
  • Additionally Known as Typ 262
Sigma Quattro
(Full Review)
  • 29MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sigma SA Mount
  • 625g - 147 x 95 x 91mm
  • Launched February 2016
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Leica M Typ 262 vs Sigma Quattro Overview

Let's look closer at the Leica M Typ 262 vs Sigma Quattro, former is a Pro Mirrorless while the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by brands Leica and Sigma. The resolution of the M Typ 262 (24MP) and the Quattro (29MP) is pretty similar but the M Typ 262 (Full frame) and Quattro (APS-C) offer different sensor size.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The M Typ 262 was manufactured 3 months earlier than the Quattro so they are of a similar age. Both the cameras have the same body design (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).

Before getting straight to a in-depth comparison, here is a simple summation of how the M Typ 262 grades vs the Quattro with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
	
	

Reasons to pick Leica M Typ 262 over the Sigma Quattro

 M Typ 262 Quattro 

Reasons to pick Sigma Quattro over the Leica M Typ 262

 Quattro M Typ 262 
Screen resolution1620k921kSharper screen (+699k dot)

Common features in the Leica M Typ 262 and Sigma Quattro

 M Typ 262 Quattro 
LaunchedNovember 2015February 2016Similar age
Focus manually Very exact focusing
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen dimensions3"3"Equal screen size
Selfie screen Neither provides selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Absent Touch friendly screen

Leica M Typ 262 vs Sigma Quattro Physical Comparison

When you are intending to carry around your camera regularly, you are going to need to take into account its weight and measurements. The Leica M Typ 262 provides outside dimensions of 139mm x 80mm x 42mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.7") and a weight of 600 grams (1.32 lbs) while the Sigma Quattro has proportions of 147mm x 95mm x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") with a weight of 625 grams (1.38 lbs).

Take a look at the Leica M Typ 262 vs Sigma Quattro in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are using at that moment. Underneath is a front view overall size comparison of the M Typ 262 and the Quattro.

Leica M Typ 262 vs Sigma Quattro size comparison

Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the M Typ 262 and Quattro is 77 and 63 respectively.

Leica M Typ 262 vs Sigma Quattro top view buttons comparison

Leica M Typ 262 vs Sigma Quattro Sensor Comparison

More often than not, its difficult to visualize the difference between sensor sizes simply by reading a spec sheet. The pic here may offer you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the M Typ 262 and Quattro.

As you can see, the two cameras have different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The M Typ 262 because of its bigger sensor is going to make getting shallow DOF easier and the Sigma Quattro will offer greater detail due to its extra 5MP. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop pictures a bit more aggressively.

Leica M Typ 262 vs Sigma Quattro sensor size comparison

Leica M Typ 262 vs Sigma Quattro Screen and ViewFinder

Leica M Typ 262 vs Sigma Quattro Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Leica M Typ 262
Portrait photography with Sigma Quattro
75
has manual focus
megapixel count good (24MP)
large sensor size (Full frame)
supports RAW formats
doesn't have liveview
81
focusing manually
MP count excellent (29 megapixels)
good sensor size (APS-C)
supports face detect autofocus
exports RAW formats
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Street Comparison

Street photography with Leica M Typ 262
Street photography with Sigma Quattro
66
large sensor size (Full frame)
supports RAW formats
no moving screen
no image stabilization
59
good sensor size (APS-C)
exports RAW formats
environment proofing
screen is fixed
does not have image stabilization
more heavy than competition (625g)
Photography Glossary

Sports Comparison

Leica M Typ 262 Sports photography details
Sigma Quattro Sports photography details
50
megapixel count good (24MP)
large sensor size (Full frame)
doesn't have liveview
low frames per second (3.0 frames/s)
no shutter priority
no image stabilization
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
70
MP count excellent (29MP)
good sensor size (APS-C)
supports tracking focus
environment proofing
sensor has phase detect autofocus
slow continuous shooting (3.8 fps)
does not have image stabilization
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Travel Comparison

Leica M Typ 262 as a Travel photography camera
Sigma Quattro as a Travel photography camera
58
megapixel count good (24 megapixels)
missing Timelapse recording
does not offer selfie friendly display
55
environment proofing
MP count excellent (29MP)
does not have Timelapse mode
more heavy than competition (625 grams)
doesn't have a selfie friendly display
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Landscape Comparison

Leica M Typ 262 as a Landscape photography camera
Sigma Quattro as a Landscape photography camera
69
has manual focus
interchangeable lenses (Leica M mount)
screen is a good size (3 inches)
megapixel count good (24MP)
large sensor size (Full frame)
supports RAW formats
doesn't have liveview
no image stabilization
missing Timelapse recording
72
focusing manually
switch lenses (Sigma SA mount)
pretty good screen size (3 inch)
MP count excellent (29 megapixels)
good sensor size (APS-C)
exports RAW formats
environment proofing
does not have image stabilization
does not have Timelapse mode
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Vlogging Comparison

Leica M Typ 262 as a Vlogging camera
Sigma Quattro as a Vlogging camera
22
does not offer selfie friendly display
no image stabilization
video resolution low ( pixels)
missing microphone socket
22
supports face detect autofocus
doesn't have a selfie friendly display
does not have image stabilization
low quality video ( pixels)
does not have microphone socket
more heavy than competition (625 grams)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Leica M Typ 262 vs Sigma Quattro Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Leica M Typ 262 and Sigma Quattro
 Leica M Typ 262Sigma sd Quattro
General Information
Company Leica Sigma
Model type Leica M Typ 262 Sigma sd Quattro
Alternate name Typ 262 -
Type Pro Mirrorless Advanced Mirrorless
Launched 2015-11-19 2016-02-23
Physical type Rangefinder-style mirrorless Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Processor Chip Maestro Dual TRUE III
Sensor type CMOS CMOS (Foveon X3)
Sensor size Full frame APS-C
Sensor measurements 35.8 x 23.9mm 23.5 x 15.6mm
Sensor area 855.6mm² 366.6mm²
Sensor resolution 24MP 29MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 3:2 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 5952 x 3976 5424 x 3616
Maximum native ISO 6400 6400
Min native ISO 200 100
RAW images
Min boosted ISO 100 -
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detect autofocus
Contract detect autofocus
Phase detect autofocus
Total focus points - 9
Lens
Lens support Leica M Sigma SA
Total lenses 59 76
Focal length multiplier 1 1.5
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display diagonal 3 inch 3 inch
Resolution of display 921 thousand dots 1,620 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (rangefinder) Electronic
Viewfinder resolution - 2,360 thousand dots
Viewfinder coverage - 100%
Viewfinder magnification 0.68x 0.73x
Features
Lowest shutter speed 60 secs 30 secs
Highest shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/4000 secs
Continuous shooting rate 3.0 frames per sec 3.8 frames per sec
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance no built-in flash no built-in flash
Flash settings no built-in flash no built-in flash
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec)
GPS Optional None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 600 grams (1.32 lbs) 625 grams (1.38 lbs)
Physical dimensions 139 x 80 x 42mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.7") 147 x 95 x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery ID BP-SCL2 BP-61
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC/SDXC
Card slots One One
Retail price $5,069 $738