Leica M Typ 262 vs Sigma Quattro H
77 Imaging
71 Features
35 Overall
56
78 Imaging
71 Features
59 Overall
66
Leica M Typ 262 vs Sigma Quattro H Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 200 - 6400
- Leica M Mount
- 600g - 139 x 80 x 42mm
- Revealed November 2015
- Alternative Name is Typ 262
(Full Review)
- 45MP - APS-H Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sigma SA Mount
- n/ag - 147 x 95 x 91mm
- Released February 2016
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Leica M Typ 262 vs Sigma Quattro H Overview
Its time to look closer at the Leica M Typ 262 versus Sigma Quattro H, former is a Pro Mirrorless while the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by competitors Leica and Sigma. There exists a noticeable gap among the sensor resolutions of the M Typ 262 (24MP) and Quattro H (45MP) and the M Typ 262 (Full frame) and Quattro H (APS-H) possess different sensor sizing.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe M Typ 262 was revealed 3 months earlier than the Quattro H which means that they are of a similar age. Both of these cameras offer the identical body type (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before delving through a full comparison, below is a quick summary of how the M Typ 262 grades against the Quattro H for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Leica M Typ 262 vs Sigma Quattro H Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Leica M Typ 262 & Sigma sd Quattro H. The full galleries are provided at Leica M Typ 262 Gallery & Sigma Quattro H Gallery.
Reasons to pick Leica M Typ 262 over the Sigma Quattro H
| M Typ 262 | Quattro H |
|---|
Reasons to pick Sigma Quattro H over the Leica M Typ 262
| Quattro H | M Typ 262 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display resolution | 1620k | 921k | Sharper display (+699k dot) |
Common features in the Leica M Typ 262 and Sigma Quattro H
| M Typ 262 | Quattro H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | November 2015 | February 2016 | Same age | |
| Focus manually | Dial exact focus | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Display sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent display measurement | |
| Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly display | Lack of Touch friendly display |
Leica M Typ 262 vs Sigma Quattro H Physical Comparison
If you are planning to travel with your camera frequently, you need to factor in its weight and measurements. The Leica M Typ 262 offers outside dimensions of 139mm x 80mm x 42mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.7") and a weight of 600 grams (1.32 lbs) and the Sigma Quattro H has proportions of 147mm x 95mm x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") having a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
Compare the Leica M Typ 262 versus Sigma Quattro H in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you select at that moment. Here is the front view size comparison of the M Typ 262 compared to the Quattro H.

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the M Typ 262 and Quattro H is 77 and 78 respectively.
Leica M Typ 262 vs Sigma Quattro H Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it's tough to picture the difference in sensor dimensions merely by viewing a spec sheet. The picture here will give you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the M Typ 262 and Quattro H.
As you can see, both of these cameras enjoy different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The M Typ 262 using its larger sensor is going to make shooting bokeh simpler and the Sigma Quattro H will render more detail because of its extra 21 Megapixels. Greater resolution will allow you to crop photos far more aggressively.
Leica M Typ 262 vs Sigma Quattro H Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Leica M Typ 262 vs Sigma Quattro H Specifications
| Leica M Typ 262 | Sigma sd Quattro H | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Leica | Sigma |
| Model type | Leica M Typ 262 | Sigma sd Quattro H |
| Also called as | Typ 262 | - |
| Type | Pro Mirrorless | Advanced Mirrorless |
| Revealed | 2015-11-19 | 2016-02-23 |
| Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | Maestro | Dual TRUE III |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
| Sensor size | Full frame | APS-H |
| Sensor measurements | 35.8 x 23.9mm | 26.6 x 17.9mm |
| Sensor surface area | 855.6mm² | 476.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 24MP | 45MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 5952 x 3976 | 6200 x 4152 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 200 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Minimum boosted ISO | 100 | - |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | Leica M | Sigma SA |
| Available lenses | 59 | 76 |
| Focal length multiplier | 1 | 1.4 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 921 thousand dot | 1,620 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Optical (rangefinder) | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,360 thousand dot |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.68x | 0.73x |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | 3.0 frames per sec | 3.8 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
| Flash modes | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) |
| GPS | Optional | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 600 gr (1.32 pounds) | - |
| Dimensions | 139 x 80 x 42mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.7") | 147 x 95 x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | BP-SCL2 | BP-61 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at launch | $5,069 | $1,134 |