Leica M Typ 262 vs Sony A9
77 Imaging
72 Features
35 Overall
57
65 Imaging
74 Features
93 Overall
81
Leica M Typ 262 vs Sony A9 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 6400
- Leica M Mount
- 600g - 139 x 80 x 42mm
- Revealed November 2015
- Additionally referred to as Typ 262
(Full Review)
- 24MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 51200 (Boost to 204800)
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Sony E Mount
- 673g - 127 x 96 x 63mm
- Revealed April 2017
- Replacement is Sony A9 II
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels Leica M Typ 262 vs Sony A9 Overview
Lets look closer at the Leica M Typ 262 and Sony A9, both Pro Mirrorless cameras by manufacturers Leica and Sony. The resolution of the M Typ 262 (24MP) and the A9 (24MP) is very close and both cameras posses the same sensor sizing (Full frame).
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe M Typ 262 was released 17 months before the A9 making them a generation apart from each other. Both the cameras have different body design with the Leica M Typ 262 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Sony A9 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.
Before diving straight to a detailed comparison, here is a brief overview of how the M Typ 262 matches up against the A9 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Leica M Typ 262 vs Sony A9 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Leica M Typ 262 & Sony Alpha A9. The complete galleries are viewable at Leica M Typ 262 Gallery & Sony A9 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Leica M Typ 262 over the Sony A9
| M Typ 262 | A9 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Sony A9 over the Leica M Typ 262
| A9 | M Typ 262 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | April 2017 |  | November 2015 | Fresher by 17 months |
| Display type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting display |
| Display resolution | 1440k |  | 921k | Sharper display (+519k dot) |
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Leica M Typ 262 and Sony A9
| M Typ 262 | A9 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Dial precise focusing | ||
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal display measurement |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen |
Leica M Typ 262 vs Sony A9 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to carry your camera, you are going to need to factor its weight and measurements. The Leica M Typ 262 provides physical dimensions of 139mm x 80mm x 42mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.7") with a weight of 600 grams (1.32 lbs) and the Sony A9 has proportions of 127mm x 96mm x 63mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 2.5") and a weight of 673 grams (1.48 lbs).
Analyze the Leica M Typ 262 and Sony A9 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you have at that moment. Below is a front view proportions comparison of the M Typ 262 compared to the A9.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the M Typ 262 and A9 is 77 and 65 respectively.
Leica M Typ 262 vs Sony A9 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it's tough to envision the contrast in sensor sizing purely by researching specifications. The photograph underneath may give you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the M Typ 262 and A9.
To sum up, each of the cameras have the same sensor dimensions and the same exact MP therefore you can expect comparable quality of pictures though you should take the launch date of the cameras into account. The older M Typ 262 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
Leica M Typ 262 vs Sony A9 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Leica M Typ 262 vs Sony A9 Specifications
| Leica M Typ 262 | Sony Alpha A9 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Leica | Sony |
| Model | Leica M Typ 262 | Sony Alpha A9 |
| Also called as | Typ 262 | - |
| Class | Pro Mirrorless | Pro Mirrorless |
| Revealed | 2015-11-19 | 2017-04-19 |
| Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | SLR-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | Maestro | BIONZ X |
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | Full frame | Full frame |
| Sensor measurements | 35.8 x 23.9mm | 35.6 x 23.8mm |
| Sensor surface area | 855.6mm² | 847.3mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 24 megapixel | 24 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 5952 x 3976 | 6000 x 4000 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 51200 |
| Highest enhanced ISO | - | 204800 |
| Lowest native ISO | 200 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Lowest enhanced ISO | 100 | 50 |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 693 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | Leica M | Sony E |
| Number of lenses | 59 | 121 |
| Crop factor | 1 | 1 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Screen size | 3" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 921k dots | 1,440k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Optical (rangefinder) | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 3,686k dots |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.68x | 0.78x |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 60 secs | 30 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/8000 secs |
| Max silent shutter speed | - | 1/32000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | 3.0 frames/s | 20.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
| Flash options | no built-in flash | Flash off, Autoflash, Fill-flash, Slow Sync., Rear Sync., Red-eye reduction, Wireless, Hi-speed sync |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Highest video resolution | - | 3840x2160 |
| Video file format | - | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | Optional | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 600 gr (1.32 lbs) | 673 gr (1.48 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 139 x 80 x 42mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.7") | 127 x 96 x 63mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 2.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | 92 |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 24.9 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 13.3 |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 3517 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 650 images |
| Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | BP-SCL2 | NP-FZ100 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2, 5, 10 secs + continuous) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots (UHS-II compatible) |
| Card slots | Single | Dual |
| Launch pricing | $5,069 | $4,498 |
