Leica M Typ 262 vs Sony A6500
77 Imaging
71 Features
35 Overall
56
81 Imaging
66 Features
85 Overall
73
Leica M Typ 262 vs Sony A6500 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 6400
- Leica M Mount
- 600g - 139 x 80 x 42mm
- Revealed November 2015
- Additionally referred to as Typ 262
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600 (Push to 51200)
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Sony E Mount
- 453g - 120 x 67 x 53mm
- Announced October 2016
- Replaced the Sony A6300
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Leica M Typ 262 vs Sony A6500 Overview
Lets look closer at the Leica M Typ 262 and Sony A6500, former is a Pro Mirrorless while the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by brands Leica and Sony. The resolution of the M Typ 262 (24MP) and the A6500 (24MP) is pretty close but the M Typ 262 (Full frame) and A6500 (APS-C) have totally different sensor measurements.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe M Typ 262 was brought out 10 months earlier than the A6500 and they are of a similar age. Both cameras have the same body design (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before diving straight to a more detailed comparison, here is a short summation of how the M Typ 262 matches up vs the A6500 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Leica M Typ 262 vs Sony A6500 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Leica M Typ 262 & Sony Alpha a6500. The entire galleries are viewable at Leica M Typ 262 Gallery & Sony A6500 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Leica M Typ 262 over the Sony A6500
| M Typ 262 | A6500 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Sony A6500 over the Leica M Typ 262
| A6500 | M Typ 262 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | October 2016 | November 2015 | More modern by 10 months | |
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
| Screen resolution | 922k | 921k | Clearer screen (+1k dot) | |
| Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Leica M Typ 262 and Sony A6500
| M Typ 262 | A6500 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | Very accurate focusing | |||
| Screen dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal screen measurements | |
| Selfie screen | Neither comes with selfie screen |
Leica M Typ 262 vs Sony A6500 Physical Comparison
If you are intending to carry around your camera, you have to factor its weight and proportions. The Leica M Typ 262 comes with exterior measurements of 139mm x 80mm x 42mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.7") along with a weight of 600 grams (1.32 lbs) and the Sony A6500 has measurements of 120mm x 67mm x 53mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 2.1") with a weight of 453 grams (1.00 lbs).
Contrast the Leica M Typ 262 and Sony A6500 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you use at that time. Below is a front view measurement comparison of the M Typ 262 and the A6500.

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the M Typ 262 and A6500 is 77 and 81 respectively.
Leica M Typ 262 vs Sony A6500 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is very tough to envision the contrast in sensor sizes purely by researching specifications. The picture underneath should offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the M Typ 262 and A6500.
Plainly, both cameras have the same MP albeit not the same sensor sizes. The M Typ 262 has got the bigger sensor which will make achieving shallow depth of field easier. The more aged M Typ 262 will be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
Leica M Typ 262 vs Sony A6500 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Leica M Typ 262 vs Sony A6500 Specifications
| Leica M Typ 262 | Sony Alpha a6500 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Leica | Sony |
| Model | Leica M Typ 262 | Sony Alpha a6500 |
| Also referred to as | Typ 262 | - |
| Class | Pro Mirrorless | Advanced Mirrorless |
| Revealed | 2015-11-19 | 2016-10-06 |
| Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | Maestro | Bionz X |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | Full frame | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 35.8 x 23.9mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
| Sensor surface area | 855.6mm² | 366.6mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 24 megapixels | 24 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 5952 x 3976 | 6000 x 4000 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 25600 |
| Highest enhanced ISO | - | 51200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 200 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Minimum enhanced ISO | 100 | - |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 425 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | Leica M | Sony E |
| Available lenses | 59 | 121 |
| Focal length multiplier | 1 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 921k dots | 922k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Optical (rangefinder) | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,359k dots |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.68x | 0.7x |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 60 secs | 30 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Max silent shutter speed | - | 1/32000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | 3.0fps | 11.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | no built-in flash | 6.00 m (at ISO 100) |
| Flash modes | no built-in flash | Flash off, Autoflash, Fill-flash, Rear Sync., Slow Sync., Red-eye reduction (On/Off selectable), Hi-speed sync, Wireless |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Max flash synchronize | - | 1/160 secs |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | - | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 100 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM |
| Highest video resolution | - | 3840x2160 |
| Video data format | - | MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | Optional | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 600 grams (1.32 lbs) | 453 grams (1.00 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 139 x 80 x 42mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.7") | 120 x 67 x 53mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 2.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | 85 |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 24.5 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 13.7 |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 1405 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 350 photos |
| Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | BP-SCL2 | NP-FW50 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes |
| Time lapse feature | With downloadable app | |
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC + Memory Stick Pro Duo |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Pricing at release | $5,069 | $1,298 |