Leica M11 vs Olympus E-PM2
76 Imaging
83 Features
56 Overall
72
89 Imaging
52 Features
63 Overall
56
Leica M11 vs Olympus E-PM2 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 60MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3.00" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 64 - 50000
- No Video
- Leica M Mount
- 640g - 139 x 80 x 39mm
- Revealed January 2022
- Replaced the Leica M10
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 269g - 110 x 64 x 34mm
- Released May 2013
- Replaced the Olympus E-PM1
Leica M11 vs Olympus E-PM2 Overview
Below is a extensive review of the Leica M11 versus Olympus E-PM2, one being a Pro Mirrorless and the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by brands Leica and Olympus. There is a huge difference between the image resolutions of the M11 (60MP) and E-PM2 (16MP) and the M11 (Full frame) and E-PM2 (Four Thirds) offer different sensor sizes.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe M11 was released 8 years later than the E-PM2 and that is quite a significant gap as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras have the same body design (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before we go right into a complete comparison, here is a quick view of how the M11 grades vs the E-PM2 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Leica M11 vs Olympus E-PM2 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Leica M11 and Olympus PEN E-PM2. The complete galleries are provided at Leica M11 Gallery and Olympus E-PM2 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Leica M11 over the Olympus E-PM2
M11 | E-PM2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2022 | May 2013 | More recent by 106 months | |
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating display | |
Display resolution | 2333k | 460k | Clearer display (+1873k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PM2 over the Leica M11
E-PM2 | M11 |
---|
Common features in the Leica M11 and Olympus E-PM2
M11 | E-PM2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | More precise focusing | |||
Display dimensions | 3.00" | 3" | Equal display dimensions | |
Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Leica M11 vs Olympus E-PM2 Physical Comparison
In case you're going to lug around your camera, you are going to need to factor in its weight and measurements. The Leica M11 offers exterior measurements of 139mm x 80mm x 39mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.5") along with a weight of 640 grams (1.41 lbs) whilst the Olympus E-PM2 has proportions of 110mm x 64mm x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") along with a weight of 269 grams (0.59 lbs).
Compare the Leica M11 versus Olympus E-PM2 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you have chosen at that time. Below is a front view proportions comparison of the M11 against the E-PM2.
Using size and weight, the portability rating of the M11 and E-PM2 is 76 and 89 respectively.
Leica M11 vs Olympus E-PM2 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it can be difficult to picture the contrast between sensor measurements merely by checking a spec sheet. The photograph underneath should give you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the M11 and E-PM2.
As you can see, both the cameras have different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The M11 because of its larger sensor is going to make shooting shallow DOF easier and the Leica M11 will give extra detail as a result of its extra 44MP. Greater resolution will also let you crop images a bit more aggressively. The newer M11 should have a benefit with regard to sensor tech.
Leica M11 vs Olympus E-PM2 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Leica M11 vs Olympus E-PM2 Specifications
Leica M11 | Olympus PEN E-PM2 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Leica | Olympus |
Model | Leica M11 | Olympus PEN E-PM2 |
Category | Pro Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Revealed | 2022-01-13 | 2013-05-21 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Full frame | Four Thirds |
Sensor dimensions | 36 x 24mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor surface area | 864.0mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 60MP | 16MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 4:3 |
Highest resolution | 9528 x 6328 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 50000 | 25600 |
Minimum native ISO | 64 | 200 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Number of focus points | - | 35 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Leica M | Micro Four Thirds |
Amount of lenses | 62 | 107 |
Focal length multiplier | 1 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3.00 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 2,333k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (rangefinder) | Electronic (optional) |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.73x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 3600 seconds | 60 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Maximum quiet shutter speed | 1/16000 seconds | - |
Continuous shooting rate | 4.5 frames per second | 8.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 7.00 m (bundled FL-LM1) |
Flash settings | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | - | 1/250 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video format | - | MPEG-4, H.264, Motion JPEG |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | Yes | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Optional | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 640g (1.41 pounds) | 269g (0.59 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 139 x 80 x 39mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.5") | 110 x 64 x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 72 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 22.7 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.2 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 932 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 700 images | 360 images |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BC-SCL7 | BLS-5 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12s) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | UHS II type SD | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at launch | $8,995 | $448 |