Leica M8 vs Olympus E-PL1
79 Imaging
49 Features
31 Overall
41
86 Imaging
46 Features
43 Overall
44
Leica M8 vs Olympus E-PL1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - APS-H Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 160 - 2500
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- No Video
- Leica M Mount
- 591g - 139 x 80 x 37mm
- Introduced July 2007
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 334g - 115 x 72 x 42mm
- Announced May 2010
- Newer Model is Olympus E-PL1s
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Leica M8 vs Olympus E-PL1 Overview
In this write-up, we will be comparing the Leica M8 vs Olympus E-PL1, former is a Pro Mirrorless while the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by competitors Leica and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the M8 (10MP) and the E-PL1 (12MP) is pretty well matched but the M8 (APS-H) and E-PL1 (Four Thirds) possess different sensor measurements.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe M8 was revealed 3 years prior to the E-PL1 which is quite a significant difference as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras offer the identical body type (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before getting through a thorough comparison, below is a quick view of how the M8 scores against the E-PL1 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Leica M8 vs Olympus E-PL1 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Leica M8 & Olympus PEN E-PL1. The full galleries are viewable at Leica M8 Gallery & Olympus E-PL1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Leica M8 over the Olympus E-PL1
| M8 | E-PL1 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL1 over the Leica M8
| E-PL1 | M8 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | May 2010 | July 2007 | More modern by 34 months | |
| Screen sizing | 2.7" | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.2") |
Common features in the Leica M8 and Olympus E-PL1
| M8 | E-PL1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | Dial accurate focus | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Screen resolution | 230k | 230k | Same screen resolution | |
| Selfie screen | Neither includes selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Lack of Touch friendly screen |
Leica M8 vs Olympus E-PL1 Physical Comparison
If you're going to carry around your camera regularly, you should factor in its weight and size. The Leica M8 features exterior dimensions of 139mm x 80mm x 37mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.5") having a weight of 591 grams (1.30 lbs) and the Olympus E-PL1 has specifications of 115mm x 72mm x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") accompanied by a weight of 334 grams (0.74 lbs).
Look at the Leica M8 vs Olympus E-PL1 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you select at that time. The following is the front view dimensions comparison of the M8 and the E-PL1.

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the M8 and E-PL1 is 79 and 86 respectively.
Leica M8 vs Olympus E-PL1 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is very tough to imagine the contrast between sensor sizes only by reading through a spec sheet. The image below should offer you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the M8 and E-PL1.
Clearly, both cameras offer different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The M8 using its bigger sensor is going to make shooting shallower depth of field less difficult and the Olympus E-PL1 will give you more detail because of its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop shots a little more aggressively. The more aged M8 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
Leica M8 vs Olympus E-PL1 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Leica M8 vs Olympus E-PL1 Specifications
| Leica M8 | Olympus PEN E-PL1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Leica | Olympus |
| Model type | Leica M8 | Olympus PEN E-PL1 |
| Class | Pro Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
| Introduced | 2007-07-31 | 2010-05-17 |
| Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | - | Truepic V |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | APS-H | Four Thirds |
| Sensor dimensions | 27 x 18mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
| Sensor area | 486.0mm² | 224.9mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 3936 x 2630 | 4032 x 3024 |
| Highest native ISO | 2500 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 160 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Total focus points | - | 11 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | Leica M | Micro Four Thirds |
| Amount of lenses | 59 | 107 |
| Crop factor | 1.3 | 2.1 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.5 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Screen technology | - | HyperCrystal LCD AR (Anti-Reflective) coating |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Optical (rangefinder) | Electronic (optional) |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 8s | 60s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 3.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | no built-in flash | 10.00 m |
| Flash modes | Front Curtain, Rear Curtain, Slow sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Max flash synchronize | 1/250s | 1/160s |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
| Video format | - | Motion JPEG |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 591 grams (1.30 lbs) | 334 grams (0.74 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 139 x 80 x 37mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.5") | 115 x 72 x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | 59 | 54 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 21.1 | 21.5 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 11.3 | 10.1 |
| DXO Low light rating | 663 | 487 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 550 shots | 290 shots |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | - | BLS-1 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card | SD/SDHC card |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Price at release | $4,400 | $288 |