Leica M8 vs Olympus E-PM2
79 Imaging
49 Features
31 Overall
41
89 Imaging
51 Features
63 Overall
55
Leica M8 vs Olympus E-PM2 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - APS-H Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 160 - 2500
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- No Video
- Leica M Mount
- 591g - 139 x 80 x 37mm
- Revealed July 2007
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 269g - 110 x 64 x 34mm
- Revealed May 2013
- Earlier Model is Olympus E-PM1
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Leica M8 vs Olympus E-PM2 Overview
Let's look a bit more in depth at the Leica M8 vs Olympus E-PM2, one being a Pro Mirrorless and the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by rivals Leica and Olympus. There exists a big gap among the image resolutions of the M8 (10MP) and E-PM2 (16MP) and the M8 (APS-H) and E-PM2 (Four Thirds) use different sensor size.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe M8 was launched 6 years prior to the E-PM2 and that is a fairly big gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras come with the identical body type (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before diving straight into a in-depth comparison, below is a quick synopsis of how the M8 scores vs the E-PM2 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Leica M8 vs Olympus E-PM2 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Leica M8 and Olympus PEN E-PM2. The complete galleries are viewable at Leica M8 Gallery and Olympus E-PM2 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Leica M8 over the Olympus E-PM2
| M8 | E-PM2 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PM2 over the Leica M8
| E-PM2 | M8 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | May 2013 | July 2007 | More recent by 70 months | |
| Screen dimension | 3" | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
| Screen resolution | 460k | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) | |
| Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Leica M8 and Olympus E-PM2
| M8 | E-PM2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | Dial exact focusing | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Neither provides selfie screen |
Leica M8 vs Olympus E-PM2 Physical Comparison
For those who are going to lug around your camera frequently, you will want to think about its weight and dimensions. The Leica M8 provides exterior dimensions of 139mm x 80mm x 37mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.5") accompanied by a weight of 591 grams (1.30 lbs) whilst the Olympus E-PM2 has dimensions of 110mm x 64mm x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") and a weight of 269 grams (0.59 lbs).
Look at the Leica M8 vs Olympus E-PM2 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you have during that time. Underneath is the front view over all size comparison of the M8 against the E-PM2.

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the M8 and E-PM2 is 79 and 89 respectively.
Leica M8 vs Olympus E-PM2 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is very hard to visualize the gap in sensor measurements merely by researching specs. The photograph below may give you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the M8 and E-PM2.
All in all, each of these cameras posses different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The M8 because of its bigger sensor is going to make getting shallower depth of field easier and the Olympus E-PM2 will result in more detail utilizing its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop photographs somewhat more aggressively. The older M8 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
Leica M8 vs Olympus E-PM2 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Leica M8 vs Olympus E-PM2 Specifications
| Leica M8 | Olympus PEN E-PM2 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Leica | Olympus |
| Model type | Leica M8 | Olympus PEN E-PM2 |
| Class | Pro Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
| Revealed | 2007-07-31 | 2013-05-21 |
| Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | APS-H | Four Thirds |
| Sensor dimensions | 27 x 18mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
| Sensor area | 486.0mm² | 224.9mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10MP | 16MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 4:3 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 3936 x 2630 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 2500 | 25600 |
| Min native ISO | 160 | 200 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | - | 35 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | Leica M | Micro Four Thirds |
| Available lenses | 59 | 107 |
| Focal length multiplier | 1.3 | 2.1 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 2.5" | 3" |
| Display resolution | 230k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Optical (rangefinder) | Electronic (optional) |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 8s | 60s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 8.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | no built-in flash | 7.00 m (bundled FL-LM1) |
| Flash options | Front Curtain, Rear Curtain, Slow sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Max flash sync | 1/250s | 1/250s |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | - | MPEG-4, H.264, Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 591 grams (1.30 pounds) | 269 grams (0.59 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 139 x 80 x 37mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.5") | 110 x 64 x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | 59 | 72 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 21.1 | 22.7 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 11.3 | 12.2 |
| DXO Low light rating | 663 | 932 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 550 photographs | 360 photographs |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | - | BLS-5 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at release | $4,400 | $448 |