Leica M9-P vs Olympus E-M1 II
78 Imaging
64 Features
30 Overall
50
68 Imaging
59 Features
93 Overall
72
Leica M9-P vs Olympus E-M1 II Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 18MP - Full frame Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 2500
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- No Video
- Leica M Mount
- 600g - 139 x 80 x 37mm
- Revealed June 2011
- Previous Model is Leica M9
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
- Launched September 2016
- Replaced the Olympus E-M1
- Refreshed by Olympus E-M1 III
Leica M9-P vs Olympus E-M1 II Overview
Here is a thorough assessment of the Leica M9-P and Olympus E-M1 II, both Pro Mirrorless cameras by manufacturers Leica and Olympus. The resolution of the M9-P (18MP) and the E-M1 II (20MP) is pretty comparable but the M9-P (Full frame) and E-M1 II (Four Thirds) possess totally different sensor dimensions.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe M9-P was announced 6 years earlier than the E-M1 II and that is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Leica M9-P being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.
Before getting in to a detailed comparison, below is a quick highlight of how the M9-P matches up against the E-M1 II when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Leica M9-P vs Olympus E-M1 II Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Leica M9-P and Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II. The whole galleries are viewable at Leica M9-P Gallery and Olympus E-M1 II Gallery.
Reasons to pick Leica M9-P over the Olympus E-M1 II
M9-P | E-M1 II |
---|
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Leica M9-P
E-M1 II | M9-P | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | September 2016 | June 2011 | Fresher by 63 months | |
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
Screen dimension | 3" | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
Screen resolution | 1037k | 230k | Clearer screen (+807k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies | |||
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Leica M9-P and Olympus E-M1 II
M9-P | E-M1 II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Dial exact focus |
Leica M9-P vs Olympus E-M1 II Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to carry your camera, you'll have to factor its weight and volume. The Leica M9-P comes with outer measurements of 139mm x 80mm x 37mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.5") accompanied by a weight of 600 grams (1.32 lbs) while the Olympus E-M1 II has sizing of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") having a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs).
Compare the Leica M9-P and Olympus E-M1 II in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you use at the time. The following is the front view dimensions comparison of the M9-P against the E-M1 II.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the M9-P and E-M1 II is 78 and 68 respectively.
Leica M9-P vs Olympus E-M1 II Sensor Comparison
Typically, its hard to visualise the gap in sensor sizing purely by going through specifications. The graphic underneath may give you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the M9-P and E-M1 II.
To sum up, both of these cameras posses different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The M9-P having a bigger sensor will make getting bokeh less difficult and the Olympus E-M1 II will show extra detail with its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop shots somewhat more aggressively. The older M9-P will be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
Leica M9-P vs Olympus E-M1 II Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Leica M9-P vs Olympus E-M1 II Specifications
Leica M9-P | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Leica | Olympus |
Model | Leica M9-P | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II |
Class | Pro Mirrorless | Pro Mirrorless |
Revealed | 2011-06-21 | 2016-09-19 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | TruePic VIII |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | Full frame | Four Thirds |
Sensor measurements | 36 x 24mm | 17.4 x 13mm |
Sensor surface area | 864.0mm² | 226.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 18 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 4:3 |
Max resolution | 5212 x 3472 | 5184 x 3888 |
Max native ISO | 2500 | 25600 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 200 |
RAW format | ||
Minimum enhanced ISO | - | 64 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | - | 121 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Leica M | Micro Four Thirds |
Total lenses | 59 | 107 |
Crop factor | 1 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Screen diagonal | 2.5 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 230 thousand dots | 1,037 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen tech | TFT color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (rangefinder) | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,360 thousand dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.68x | 0.74x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 60 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/8000 seconds |
Fastest silent shutter speed | - | 1/32000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 2.0 frames per second | 60.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 9.10 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash modes | Front Curtain, Rear Curtain, Slow sync | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | - | 1/250 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
Max video resolution | None | 4096x2160 |
Video format | - | MOV, H.264 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 600g (1.32 pounds) | 574g (1.27 pounds) |
Dimensions | 139 x 80 x 37mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.5") | 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 68 | 80 |
DXO Color Depth score | 22.5 | 23.7 |
DXO Dynamic range score | 11.6 | 12.8 |
DXO Low light score | 854 | 1312 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 photos | 350 photos |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | BLH-1 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC card | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots |
Card slots | 1 | Two |
Cost at release | $7,995 | $1,700 |