Leica M9-P vs Olympus E-P2
78 Imaging
64 Features
30 Overall
50


86 Imaging
47 Features
42 Overall
45
Leica M9-P vs Olympus E-P2 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 18MP - Full frame Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 2500
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- No Video
- Leica M Mount
- 600g - 139 x 80 x 37mm
- Released June 2011
- Replaced the Leica M9
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 355g - 121 x 70 x 36mm
- Revealed April 2010
- Older Model is Olympus E-P1
- Renewed by Olympus E-P3

Leica M9-P vs Olympus E-P2 Overview
Here is a comprehensive analysis of the Leica M9-P versus Olympus E-P2, one being a Pro Mirrorless and the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by brands Leica and Olympus. There is a huge difference among the resolutions of the M9-P (18MP) and E-P2 (12MP) and the M9-P (Full frame) and E-P2 (Four Thirds) enjoy different sensor dimensions.

The M9-P was unveiled 15 months later than the E-P2 making the cameras a generation apart from each other. Both of the cameras come with the identical body type (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before delving straight into a full comparison, below is a short overview of how the M9-P matches up versus the E-P2 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Leica M9-P vs Olympus E-P2 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Leica M9-P and Olympus PEN E-P2. The full galleries are viewable at Leica M9-P Gallery and Olympus E-P2 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Leica M9-P over the Olympus E-P2
M9-P | E-P2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | June 2011 | ![]() | April 2010 | Fresher by 15 months |
Reasons to pick Olympus E-P2 over the Leica M9-P
E-P2 | M9-P | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
Common features in the Leica M9-P and Olympus E-P2
M9-P | E-P2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | More precise focus | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Same display resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lacking selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Lacking Touch display |
Leica M9-P vs Olympus E-P2 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to carry your camera, you will want to consider its weight and measurements. The Leica M9-P enjoys exterior dimensions of 139mm x 80mm x 37mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.5") accompanied by a weight of 600 grams (1.32 lbs) while the Olympus E-P2 has proportions of 121mm x 70mm x 36mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.4") having a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs).
Examine the Leica M9-P versus Olympus E-P2 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you have attached at that time. Following is the front view physical size comparison of the M9-P versus the E-P2.

Using size and weight, the portability score of the M9-P and E-P2 is 78 and 86 respectively.

Leica M9-P vs Olympus E-P2 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is very difficult to picture the difference in sensor sizing purely by researching specifications. The graphic underneath may give you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the M9-P and E-P2.
To sum up, both of the cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The M9-P having a larger sensor is going to make getting shallow DOF easier and the Leica M9-P will render extra detail having an extra 6MP. Greater resolution will also let you crop images somewhat more aggressively. The younger M9-P provides a benefit in sensor innovation.

Leica M9-P vs Olympus E-P2 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Leica M9-P vs Olympus E-P2 Specifications
Leica M9-P | Olympus PEN E-P2 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Leica | Olympus |
Model | Leica M9-P | Olympus PEN E-P2 |
Class | Pro Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Released | 2011-06-21 | 2010-04-22 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | TruePic V |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | Full frame | Four Thirds |
Sensor measurements | 36 x 24mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor surface area | 864.0mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 18 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 4:3 |
Highest Possible resolution | 5212 x 3472 | 4032 x 3024 |
Maximum native ISO | 2500 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | - | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Leica M | Micro Four Thirds |
Available lenses | 59 | 107 |
Focal length multiplier | 1 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 2.5 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 230k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen tech | TFT color LCD | HyperCrystal LCD with AR(Anti-Reflective) coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (rangefinder) | Electronic (optional) |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.68x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 60 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 2.0fps | 3.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
Flash modes | Front Curtain, Rear Curtain, Slow sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | - | 1/180 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
Video file format | - | Motion JPEG |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 600 gr (1.32 lb) | 355 gr (0.78 lb) |
Dimensions | 139 x 80 x 37mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.5") | 121 x 70 x 36mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 68 | 56 |
DXO Color Depth score | 22.5 | 21.5 |
DXO Dynamic range score | 11.6 | 10.4 |
DXO Low light score | 854 | 505 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 shots | 300 shots |
Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | BLS-1 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC card | SD/SDHC card |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Launch pricing | $7,995 | $799 |