Leica M9-P vs Olympus E-P3
78 Imaging
64 Features
30 Overall
50
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c427d/c427d7b51ebeeb24215c1799950750dec1ab4db1" alt="Leica M9-P front Leica M9-P front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b6ea0/b6ea0a3b948d31de853e5f9d71a6d0a49f1b5795" alt="Olympus PEN E-P3 front Olympus PEN E-P3 front"
86 Imaging
48 Features
60 Overall
52
Leica M9-P vs Olympus E-P3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 18MP - Full frame Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 2500
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- No Video
- Leica M Mount
- 600g - 139 x 80 x 37mm
- Released June 2011
- Replaced the Leica M9
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 369g - 122 x 69 x 34mm
- Announced August 2011
- Superseded the Olympus E-P2
- Successor is Olympus E-P5
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Leica M9-P vs Olympus E-P3 Overview
Following is a extensive review of the Leica M9-P vs Olympus E-P3, former is a Pro Mirrorless while the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by manufacturers Leica and Olympus. There exists a sizable gap among the image resolutions of the M9-P (18MP) and E-P3 (12MP) and the M9-P (Full frame) and E-P3 (Four Thirds) provide different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
The M9-P was released about the same time to the E-P3 and they are of a similar age. Both cameras have the same body design (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before getting straight to a in-depth comparison, here is a brief summary of how the M9-P matches up versus the E-P3 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Leica M9-P vs Olympus E-P3 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Leica M9-P & Olympus PEN E-P3. The complete galleries are provided at Leica M9-P Gallery & Olympus E-P3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Leica M9-P over the Olympus E-P3
M9-P | E-P3 |
---|
Reasons to pick Olympus E-P3 over the Leica M9-P
E-P3 | M9-P | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
Display resolution | 614k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper display (+384k dot) |
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Leica M9-P and Olympus E-P3
M9-P | E-P3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | June 2011 | ![]() | August 2011 | Same age |
Manually focus | ![]() | Very exact focusing | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lacking selfie screen |
Leica M9-P vs Olympus E-P3 Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to carry around your camera, you need to factor its weight and proportions. The Leica M9-P has got outside dimensions of 139mm x 80mm x 37mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.5") having a weight of 600 grams (1.32 lbs) and the Olympus E-P3 has measurements of 122mm x 69mm x 34mm (4.8" x 2.7" x 1.3") with a weight of 369 grams (0.81 lbs).
Check the Leica M9-P vs Olympus E-P3 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are using during that time. Following is a front view proportions comparison of the M9-P vs the E-P3.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/df942/df9421c2305da85e5ab9369c2759af9ee1b7fd72" alt="Leica M9-P vs Olympus E-P3 size comparison Leica M9-P vs Olympus E-P3 size comparison"
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the M9-P and E-P3 is 78 and 86 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/37677/37677e3a333ff0aad1b523d65cdacb5e68e9c3b1" alt="Leica M9-P vs Olympus E-P3 top view buttons comparison Leica M9-P vs Olympus E-P3 top view buttons comparison"
Leica M9-P vs Olympus E-P3 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is very hard to visualize the difference in sensor sizes simply by researching a spec sheet. The picture here will help give you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the M9-P and E-P3.
Clearly, each of the cameras have different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The M9-P featuring a larger sensor is going to make shooting shallow DOF less difficult and the Leica M9-P will render extra detail as a result of its extra 6MP. Greater resolution will also let you crop images a bit more aggressively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a368d/a368d50efc17dd7a683ccabae063963fc9b4a07a" alt="Leica M9-P vs Olympus E-P3 sensor size comparison Leica M9-P vs Olympus E-P3 sensor size comparison"
Leica M9-P vs Olympus E-P3 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b3453/b34537c4af04b385be0547ead166d1604dea1939" alt="Leica M9-P vs Olympus E-P3 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Leica M9-P vs Olympus E-P3 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Leica M9-P vs Olympus E-P3 Specifications
Leica M9-P | Olympus PEN E-P3 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Leica | Olympus |
Model type | Leica M9-P | Olympus PEN E-P3 |
Category | Pro Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Released | 2011-06-21 | 2011-08-17 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | TruePic VI |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | Full frame | Four Thirds |
Sensor dimensions | 36 x 24mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor surface area | 864.0mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 18 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 4:3 |
Highest Possible resolution | 5212 x 3472 | 4032 x 3024 |
Maximum native ISO | 2500 | 12800 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | - | 35 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Leica M | Micro Four Thirds |
Number of lenses | 59 | 107 |
Focal length multiplier | 1 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 2.5 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 614 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen technology | TFT color LCD | 3:2 OLED with Anti-Fingerprint Coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (rangefinder) | Electronic (optional) |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.68x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 60 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 2.0 frames per sec | 3.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 10.00 m (@ ISO 200) |
Flash modes | Front Curtain, Rear Curtain, Slow sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Wireless, Manual (3 levels) |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | - | 1/180 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video format | - | AVCHD, Motion JPEG |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 600 gr (1.32 pounds) | 369 gr (0.81 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 139 x 80 x 37mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.5") | 122 x 69 x 34mm (4.8" x 2.7" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 68 | 51 |
DXO Color Depth rating | 22.5 | 20.8 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 11.6 | 10.1 |
DXO Low light rating | 854 | 536 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 photographs | 330 photographs |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | BLS-5 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC card | SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch pricing | $7,995 | $0 |