Leica M9-P vs Olympus E-PL5
78 Imaging
63 Features
30 Overall
49
88 Imaging
51 Features
72 Overall
59
Leica M9-P vs Olympus E-PL5 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 18MP - Full frame Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 2500
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- No Video
- Leica M Mount
- 600g - 139 x 80 x 37mm
- Launched June 2011
- Replaced the Leica M9
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 325g - 111 x 64 x 38mm
- Launched September 2012
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Leica M9-P vs Olympus E-PL5 Overview
Let's look a bit more in depth at the Leica M9-P versus Olympus E-PL5, former is a Pro Mirrorless while the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by companies Leica and Olympus. The resolution of the M9-P (18MP) and the E-PL5 (16MP) is pretty comparable but the M9-P (Full frame) and E-PL5 (Four Thirds) feature totally different sensor dimensions.
Photography GlossaryThe M9-P was manufactured 15 months earlier than the E-PL5 which makes the cameras a generation away from each other. Each of the cameras come with the identical body type (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before diving through a complete comparison, below is a concise overview of how the M9-P grades against the E-PL5 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Leica M9-P vs Olympus E-PL5 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Leica M9-P & Olympus PEN E-PL5. The entire galleries are available at Leica M9-P Gallery & Olympus E-PL5 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Leica M9-P over the Olympus E-PL5
| M9-P | E-PL5 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL5 over the Leica M9-P
| E-PL5 | M9-P | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | September 2012 | June 2011 | Newer by 15 months | |
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
| Screen dimension | 3" | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
| Screen resolution | 460k | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) | |
| Selfie screen | Easy selfies | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Leica M9-P and Olympus E-PL5
| M9-P | E-PL5 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | Dial precise focusing |
Leica M9-P vs Olympus E-PL5 Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to travel with your camera regularly, you will have to take into account its weight and measurements. The Leica M9-P provides outer measurements of 139mm x 80mm x 37mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.5") with a weight of 600 grams (1.32 lbs) whilst the Olympus E-PL5 has proportions of 111mm x 64mm x 38mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.5") having a weight of 325 grams (0.72 lbs).
Examine the Leica M9-P versus Olympus E-PL5 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you have chosen during that time. Below is the front view dimension comparison of the M9-P vs the E-PL5.

Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the M9-P and E-PL5 is 78 and 88 respectively.
Leica M9-P vs Olympus E-PL5 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it can be tough to envision the contrast in sensor dimensions purely by checking out a spec sheet. The picture below will offer you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the M9-P and E-PL5.
Clearly, both of the cameras posses different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The M9-P because of its bigger sensor will make achieving bokeh simpler and the Leica M9-P will produce greater detail due to its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also let you crop shots somewhat more aggressively. The more aged M9-P will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
Leica M9-P vs Olympus E-PL5 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Leica M9-P vs Olympus E-PL5 Specifications
| Leica M9-P | Olympus PEN E-PL5 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Leica | Olympus |
| Model type | Leica M9-P | Olympus PEN E-PL5 |
| Category | Pro Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
| Launched | 2011-06-21 | 2012-09-17 |
| Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | Full frame | Four Thirds |
| Sensor measurements | 36 x 24mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
| Sensor surface area | 864.0mm² | 224.9mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 18MP | 16MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 4:3 |
| Maximum resolution | 5212 x 3472 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 2500 | 25600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 200 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Total focus points | - | 35 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | Leica M | Micro Four Thirds |
| Available lenses | 59 | 107 |
| Focal length multiplier | 1 | 2.1 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Display diagonal | 2.5 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 230k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Display tech | TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Optical (rangefinder) | Electronic (optional) |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.68x | - |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 60 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | 2.0 frames/s | 8.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | no built-in flash | 7.00 m (bundled FL-LM1) |
| Flash options | Front Curtain, Rear Curtain, Slow sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Highest flash sync | - | 1/250 seconds |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | - | MPEG-4, H.264, Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 600 grams (1.32 lbs) | 325 grams (0.72 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 139 x 80 x 37mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.5") | 111 x 64 x 38mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | 68 | 72 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 22.5 | 22.8 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 11.6 | 12.3 |
| DXO Low light rating | 854 | 889 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 350 pictures | 360 pictures |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | - | BLS-5 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Price at launch | $7,995 | $400 |