Leica M9 vs Olympus E-PL6
79 Imaging
63 Features
30 Overall
49
88 Imaging
53 Features
77 Overall
62
Leica M9 vs Olympus E-PL6 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 18MP - Full frame Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 2500
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- No Video
- Leica M Mount
- 585g - 139 x 80 x 37mm
- Introduced September 2009
- Renewed by Leica M9-P
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 325g - 111 x 64 x 38mm
- Introduced August 2014
- Newer Model is Olympus E-PL7
Leica M9 vs Olympus E-PL6 Overview
Lets look a bit more in depth at the Leica M9 versus Olympus E-PL6, one is a Pro Mirrorless and the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by rivals Leica and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the M9 (18MP) and the E-PL6 (16MP) is pretty comparable but the M9 (Full frame) and E-PL6 (Four Thirds) enjoy different sensor size.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe M9 was introduced 5 years prior to the E-PL6 which is a fairly serious gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras come with the identical body type (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before going in to a detailed comparison, below is a quick overview of how the M9 scores against the E-PL6 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Leica M9 vs Olympus E-PL6 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Leica M9 and Olympus PEN E-PL6. The whole galleries are provided at Leica M9 Gallery and Olympus E-PL6 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Leica M9 over the Olympus E-PL6
M9 | E-PL6 |
---|
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL6 over the Leica M9
E-PL6 | M9 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | August 2014 | September 2009 | More modern by 59 months | |
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Screen dimension | 3" | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
Screen resolution | 460k | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies | |||
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Leica M9 and Olympus E-PL6
M9 | E-PL6 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Dial accurate focus |
Leica M9 vs Olympus E-PL6 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to carry around your camera regularly, you need to factor in its weight and size. The Leica M9 comes with physical dimensions of 139mm x 80mm x 37mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.5") along with a weight of 585 grams (1.29 lbs) and the Olympus E-PL6 has specifications of 111mm x 64mm x 38mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.5") along with a weight of 325 grams (0.72 lbs).
Take a look at the Leica M9 versus Olympus E-PL6 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you have attached during that time. The following is the front view scale comparison of the M9 compared to the E-PL6.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the M9 and E-PL6 is 79 and 88 respectively.
Leica M9 vs Olympus E-PL6 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is very difficult to visualize the difference in sensor sizes only by going through a spec sheet. The picture underneath may provide you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the M9 and E-PL6.
As you can see, each of these cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The M9 using its bigger sensor is going to make shooting shallower DOF simpler and the Leica M9 will show more detail using its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop shots much more aggressively. The more aged M9 will be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
Leica M9 vs Olympus E-PL6 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Leica M9 vs Olympus E-PL6 Specifications
Leica M9 | Olympus PEN E-PL6 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Leica | Olympus |
Model type | Leica M9 | Olympus PEN E-PL6 |
Type | Pro Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Introduced | 2009-09-09 | 2014-08-01 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | TruePic VI |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | Full frame | Four Thirds |
Sensor measurements | 36 x 24mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor area | 864.0mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 18 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 5212 x 3472 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 2500 | 25600 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | - | 35 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Leica M | Micro Four Thirds |
Available lenses | 59 | 107 |
Crop factor | 1 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen size | 2.5 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 230k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Screen tech | TFT color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (rangefinder) | Electronic (optional) |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.68x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 60s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shooting rate | 2.0fps | 8.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 7.00 m (bundled FL-LM1) |
Flash options | Front Curtain, Rear Curtain, Slow sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | 1/180s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video format | - | MPEG-4, Motion JPEG |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 585 gr (1.29 pounds) | 325 gr (0.72 pounds) |
Dimensions | 139 x 80 x 37mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.5") | 111 x 64 x 38mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 69 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 22.5 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 11.7 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 884 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 images | 360 images |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | BLS-5 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC card | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | One | One |
Launch price | $2,750 | $300 |