Clicky

Leica M9 vs Pentax Q-S1

Portability
79
Imaging
63
Features
30
Overall
49
Leica M9 front
 
Pentax Q-S1 front
Portability
92
Imaging
38
Features
54
Overall
44

Leica M9 vs Pentax Q-S1 Key Specs

Leica M9
(Full Review)
  • 18MP - Full frame Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 2500
  • No Anti-Alias Filter
  • No Video
  • Leica M Mount
  • 585g - 139 x 80 x 37mm
  • Revealed September 2009
  • New Model is Leica M9-P
Pentax Q-S1
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 12800
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Pentax Q Mount
  • 203g - 105 x 58 x 34mm
  • Launched August 2014
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Leica M9 vs Pentax Q-S1 Overview

Below, we are reviewing the Leica M9 versus Pentax Q-S1, former is a Pro Mirrorless while the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by competitors Leica and Pentax. There is a considerable difference between the sensor resolutions of the M9 (18MP) and Q-S1 (12MP) and the M9 (Full frame) and Q-S1 (1/1.7") possess totally different sensor sizing.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

The M9 was manufactured 5 years before the Q-S1 which is quite a large difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras come with the identical body type (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).

Before diving straight into a step-by-step comparison, below is a short view of how the M9 scores versus the Q-S1 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels
	
	

Reasons to pick Leica M9 over the Pentax Q-S1

 M9 Q-S1 

Reasons to pick Pentax Q-S1 over the Leica M9

 Q-S1 M9 
LaunchedAugust 2014September 2009Newer by 59 months
Display dimension3"2.5"Larger display (+0.5")
Display resolution460k230kCrisper display (+230k dot)

Common features in the Leica M9 and Pentax Q-S1

 M9 Q-S1 
Focus manually Dial exact focusing
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Neither provides selfie screen
Touch friendly display Neither provides Touch friendly display

Leica M9 vs Pentax Q-S1 Physical Comparison

For anybody who is planning to travel with your camera frequently, you will want to consider its weight and size. The Leica M9 provides outer dimensions of 139mm x 80mm x 37mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.5") having a weight of 585 grams (1.29 lbs) while the Pentax Q-S1 has specifications of 105mm x 58mm x 34mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") with a weight of 203 grams (0.45 lbs).

See the Leica M9 versus Pentax Q-S1 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you use at that time. Here is the front view over all size comparison of the M9 against the Q-S1.

Leica M9 vs Pentax Q-S1 size comparison

Using size and weight, the portability rating of the M9 and Q-S1 is 79 and 92 respectively.

Leica M9 vs Pentax Q-S1 top view buttons comparison

Leica M9 vs Pentax Q-S1 Sensor Comparison

Generally, its difficult to envision the difference between sensor dimensions only by checking specs. The picture here may provide you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the M9 and Q-S1.

As you can plainly see, both of the cameras posses different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The M9 because of its larger sensor will make achieving bokeh easier and the Leica M9 will give you greater detail due to its extra 6MP. Greater resolution will enable you to crop photos somewhat more aggressively. The more aged M9 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.

Leica M9 vs Pentax Q-S1 sensor size comparison

Leica M9 vs Pentax Q-S1 Screen and ViewFinder

Leica M9 vs Pentax Q-S1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Leica M9 as a Portrait photography camera
Pentax Q-S1 as a Portrait photography camera
69
you can focus manually
MP count decent (18 megapixels)
great sensor size (Full frame)
delivers RAW files
doesn't have liveview
46
manual focus
includes face detection autofocus
exports RAW files
low resolution sensor (12 megapixels)
very small sensor (1/1.7")
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Street Comparison

Street photography with Leica M9
Street photography with Pentax Q-S1
65
great sensor size (Full frame)
delivers RAW files
screen does not articulate
no image stabilization
69
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
exports RAW files
lighter than competitors (203 grams)
screen does not articulate
very small sensor (1/1.7")
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Sports Comparison

Leica M9 Sports photography factors
Pentax Q-S1 Sports photography factors
44
MP count decent (18MP)
great sensor size (Full frame)
doesn't have liveview
very slow continuous shooting (2.0 fps)
no shutter priority mode
no image stabilization
bad battery life (350 CIPA)
no phase detect autofocus
37
maximum shutter speed is high (1/8,000 seconds)
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
includes tracking autofocus
continuous shooting slow (5.0 frames/s)
low resolution sensor (12MP)
very small sensor (1/1.7")
bad battery power (250 CIPA)
has no phase detect autofocus
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Leica M9
Travel photography with Pentax Q-S1
54
MP count decent (18MP)
doesn't have Time Lapse recording
bad battery life (350 CIPA)
does not posses selfie friendly screen
60
lighter than competitors (203g)
has built in flash
bad battery power (250 CIPA)
low resolution sensor (12MP)
screen isn't selfie friendly
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Leica M9
Landscape photography with Pentax Q-S1
60
you can focus manually
change lenses (Leica M mount)
MP count decent (18MP)
great sensor size (Full frame)
no low pass filter
delivers RAW files
screen is small (2.5 inch)
doesn't have liveview
no image stabilization
bad battery life (350 shots)
doesn't have Time Lapse recording
55
manual focus
swap lenses (Pentax Q mount)
nice screen size (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
exports RAW files
low resolution sensor (12 megapixels)
very small sensor (1/1.7")
bad battery power (250 shots)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Vlogging Comparison

Leica M9 Vlogging factors
Pentax Q-S1 Vlogging factors
9
can't shoot video
35
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
includes face detection autofocus
good video quality (1920 x 1080 pxls)
lighter than competitors (203g)
screen isn't selfie friendly
doesn't have external microphone socket
Photography Glossary

Leica M9 vs Pentax Q-S1 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Leica M9 and Pentax Q-S1
 Leica M9Pentax Q-S1
General Information
Brand Leica Pentax
Model Leica M9 Pentax Q-S1
Category Pro Mirrorless Entry-Level Mirrorless
Revealed 2009-09-09 2014-08-04
Physical type Rangefinder-style mirrorless Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Powered by - Q Engine
Sensor type CCD BSI-CMOS
Sensor size Full frame 1/1.7"
Sensor measurements 36 x 24mm 7.44 x 5.58mm
Sensor area 864.0mm² 41.5mm²
Sensor resolution 18MP 12MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 3:2 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Full resolution 5212 x 3472 4000 x 3000
Max native ISO 2500 12800
Min native ISO 80 100
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch focus
AF continuous
AF single
Tracking AF
Selective AF
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Lens
Lens mounting type Leica M Pentax Q
Number of lenses 59 8
Crop factor 1 4.8
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 2.5 inch 3 inch
Screen resolution 230k dots 460k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Screen tech TFT color LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (rangefinder) None
Viewfinder magnification 0.68x -
Features
Lowest shutter speed 4s 30s
Highest shutter speed 1/4000s 1/8000s
Continuous shooting rate 2.0 frames per second 5.0 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range no built-in flash 4.90 m (at ISO 100)
Flash modes Front Curtain, Rear Curtain, Slow sync Auto, redeye reduction, slow sync, trailing curtain sync
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Highest flash synchronize 1/180s -
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions - 1920 x 1080 (30,25, 24p), 1280 x 720 (30, 25, 24p), 640 x 480 (30, 25, 24p)
Max video resolution None 1920x1080
Video format - MPEG-4, H.264
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 585 grams (1.29 lbs) 203 grams (0.45 lbs)
Dimensions 139 x 80 x 37mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.5") 105 x 58 x 34mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3")
DXO scores
DXO All around score 69 not tested
DXO Color Depth score 22.5 not tested
DXO Dynamic range score 11.7 not tested
DXO Low light score 884 not tested
Other
Battery life 350 photos 250 photos
Type of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model - D-LI68
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC card SD/SDHC/SDXC card
Card slots 1 1
Cost at launch $2,750 $250