Leica Q vs Sigma DP2 Quattro
63 Imaging
71 Features
64 Overall
68
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4f261/4f2619411eb3c78d0e047f13878957d0d5fe086d" alt="Leica Q front Leica Q front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f42c9/f42c9a361334ffc5c5c43c170deef3b574f4dd47" alt="Sigma DP2 Quattro front Sigma DP2 Quattro front"
70 Imaging
63 Features
38 Overall
53
Leica Q vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 50000
- Yes Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28mm (F1.7) lens
- 640g - 130 x 80 x 93mm
- Launched June 2015
- Additionally Known as Typ 116
- Renewed by Leica Q2
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- No Video
- 45mm (F2.8) lens
- 395g - 161 x 67 x 82mm
- Announced February 2014
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Leica Q vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Overview
On this page, we are analyzing the Leica Q versus Sigma DP2 Quattro, both Large Sensor Compact cameras by competitors Leica and Sigma. The resolution of the Q (24MP) and the DP2 Quattro (20MP) is very close but the Q (Full frame) and DP2 Quattro (APS-C) boast totally different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
The Q was announced 17 months later than the DP2 Quattro making them a generation apart from each other. Both of these cameras have the same body design (Large Sensor Compact).
Before we go straight to a full comparison, here is a concise highlight of how the Q grades versus the DP2 Quattro in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Leica Q vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Leica Q and Sigma DP2 Quattro. The whole galleries are viewable at Leica Q Gallery and Sigma DP2 Quattro Gallery.
Reasons to pick Leica Q over the Sigma DP2 Quattro
Q | DP2 Quattro | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | June 2015 | ![]() | February 2014 | More recent by 17 months |
Display resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 920k | Sharper display (+120k dot) |
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Sigma DP2 Quattro over the Leica Q
DP2 Quattro | Q |
---|
Common features in the Leica Q and Sigma DP2 Quattro
Q | DP2 Quattro | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | More precise focus | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal display measurements |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither includes selfie screen |
Leica Q vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Physical Comparison
When you are planning to lug around your camera frequently, you'll need to take into account its weight and volume. The Leica Q features exterior measurements of 130mm x 80mm x 93mm (5.1" x 3.1" x 3.7") along with a weight of 640 grams (1.41 lbs) while the Sigma DP2 Quattro has sizing of 161mm x 67mm x 82mm (6.3" x 2.6" x 3.2") and a weight of 395 grams (0.87 lbs).
Examine the Leica Q versus Sigma DP2 Quattro in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you have at that moment. The following is a front view size comparison of the Q and the DP2 Quattro.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b64d0/b64d0d53a165767db3f6a0377a9af49244a4405c" alt="Leica Q vs Sigma DP2 Quattro size comparison Leica Q vs Sigma DP2 Quattro size comparison"
Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the Q and DP2 Quattro is 63 and 70 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/975d1/975d10008e78eb1746fdc401aceb94667ad728d9" alt="Leica Q vs Sigma DP2 Quattro top view buttons comparison Leica Q vs Sigma DP2 Quattro top view buttons comparison"
Leica Q vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Sensor Comparison
Often, it is difficult to envision the difference in sensor measurements just by viewing specs. The visual below might give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the Q and DP2 Quattro.
All in all, each of these cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The Q having a larger sensor will make shooting shallower DOF simpler and the Leica Q will render greater detail with its extra 4MP. Greater resolution can also let you crop photos a bit more aggressively. The younger Q will have a benefit in sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/af57f/af57f4771a87b7e25dee786e5c011ab8315fedfc" alt="Leica Q vs Sigma DP2 Quattro sensor size comparison Leica Q vs Sigma DP2 Quattro sensor size comparison"
Leica Q vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1ac9f/1ac9f86e1cc9ddf307f00331b3dc853b0ba98c3f" alt="Leica Q vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Screen and Viewfinder comparison Leica Q vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Leica Q vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Specifications
Leica Q | Sigma DP2 Quattro | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Leica | Sigma |
Model type | Leica Q | Sigma DP2 Quattro |
Also called | Typ 116 | - |
Type | Large Sensor Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2015-06-10 | 2014-02-13 |
Physical type | Large Sensor Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | Maestro II | TRUE III engine |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | Full frame | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 36 x 24mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 864.0mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 24MP | 20MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 6000 x 4000 | 5424 x 3616 |
Highest native ISO | 50000 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28mm (1x) | 45mm (1x) |
Highest aperture | f/1.7 | f/2.8 |
Macro focusing range | 17cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 1 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 1,040k dots | 920k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen tech | - | TFT color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 3,680k dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.76x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 30s | 30s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Highest silent shutter speed | 1/16000s | - |
Continuous shooting rate | 10.0 frames per sec | 3.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
Flash options | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p) | - |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
Video file format | MPEG-4 | - |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 640 grams (1.41 pounds) | 395 grams (0.87 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 130 x 80 x 93mm (5.1" x 3.1" x 3.7") | 161 x 67 x 82mm (6.3" x 2.6" x 3.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 85 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 24.3 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.7 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 2221 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | BP-DC12 | BP-51 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | - |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Cost at launch | $4,300 | $931 |