Leica SL vs Sony a3500
67 Imaging
71 Features
78 Overall
73
69 Imaging
62 Features
54 Overall
58
Leica SL vs Sony a3500 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 50 - 50000
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Leica L Mount
- 847g - 147 x 104 x 39mm
- Announced October 2015
- Alternative Name is Typ 601
- Refreshed by Leica SL2
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 16000
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony E Mount
- 411g - 128 x 91 x 85mm
- Announced March 2014
- Replaced the Sony A3000
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Leica SL vs Sony a3500 Overview
Its time to take a closer look at the Leica SL versus Sony a3500, one is a Pro Mirrorless and the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by companies Leica and Sony. The image resolution of the SL (24MP) and the a3500 (20MP) is fairly close but the SL (Full frame) and a3500 (APS-C) enjoy different sensor dimensions.
Photography GlossaryThe SL was launched 20 months after the a3500 making the cameras a generation away from one another. The two cameras come with the identical body type (SLR-style mirrorless).
Before diving in to a step-by-step comparison, below is a short summation of how the SL scores against the a3500 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Leica SL vs Sony a3500 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Leica SL and Sony Alpha a3500. The complete galleries are available at Leica SL Gallery and Sony a3500 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Leica SL over the Sony a3500
| SL | a3500 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | October 2015 | March 2014 | More modern by 20 months | |
| Display resolution | 1040k | 230k | Sharper display (+810k dot) | |
| Touch display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony a3500 over the Leica SL
| a3500 | SL |
|---|
Common features in the Leica SL and Sony a3500
| SL | a3500 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | Very exact focusing | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Display dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical display sizing | |
| Selfie screen | Neither provides selfie screen |
Leica SL vs Sony a3500 Physical Comparison
If you are going to carry around your camera often, you need to factor its weight and dimensions. The Leica SL provides outside measurements of 147mm x 104mm x 39mm (5.8" x 4.1" x 1.5") having a weight of 847 grams (1.87 lbs) while the Sony a3500 has dimensions of 128mm x 91mm x 85mm (5.0" x 3.6" x 3.3") along with a weight of 411 grams (0.91 lbs).
Look at the Leica SL versus Sony a3500 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are utilizing at the time. Following is the front view proportions comparison of the SL vs the a3500.

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the SL and a3500 is 67 and 69 respectively.
Leica SL vs Sony a3500 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, its hard to imagine the gap in sensor sizes purely by looking through technical specs. The pic below will give you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the SL and a3500.
As you can tell, both of the cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The SL due to its larger sensor is going to make getting shallower depth of field simpler and the Leica SL will provide you with more detail utilizing its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also let you crop images much more aggressively. The more recent SL provides an advantage in sensor technology.
Leica SL vs Sony a3500 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Leica SL vs Sony a3500 Specifications
| Leica SL | Sony Alpha a3500 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Leica | Sony |
| Model type | Leica SL | Sony Alpha a3500 |
| Otherwise known as | Typ 601 | - |
| Type | Pro Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
| Announced | 2015-10-21 | 2014-03-21 |
| Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | SLR-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | Maestro II | BIONZ image |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | Full frame | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 36 x 24mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
| Sensor surface area | 864.0mm² | 366.6mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 24MP | 20MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 6000 x 4000 | 5456 x 3632 |
| Max native ISO | 50000 | 16000 |
| Minimum native ISO | 50 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Total focus points | 49 | 25 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | Leica L | Sony E |
| Number of lenses | 30 | 121 |
| Crop factor | 1 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 1,040k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Screen tech | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | 4,400k dots | - |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | 100 percent |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.8x | 0.47x |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 30 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 11.0fps | 4.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | no built-in flash | 6.00 m (at ISO200 / 4m at ISO100) |
| Flash settings | no built-in flash | Flash off, Auto flash, Fill-flash, Slow Sync., Rear Sync. |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Highest flash synchronize | - | 1/160 secs |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 (24p), 3840 x 2160 (30p), 1920 x 1080 (120p, 60p, 30p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (120p, 60p, 30p, 24p) | 1920 x 1080 |
| Max video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4 | AVCHD, H.264 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 847g (1.87 lb) | 411g (0.91 lb) |
| Dimensions | 147 x 104 x 39mm (5.8" x 4.1" x 1.5") | 128 x 91 x 85mm (5.0" x 3.6" x 3.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | 88 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 25.0 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 13.4 | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | 1821 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 400 photographs | 470 photographs |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | BP-SCL4 | NP-FW50 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs) | Yes (2-sec. or 10-sec. delay) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-II supported on slot 1) | - |
| Card slots | Dual | 1 |
| Price at launch | $7,450 | $398 |