Leica T Type 701 vs Olympus E-P5
85 Imaging
58 Features
56 Overall
57
85 Imaging
53 Features
76 Overall
62
Leica T Type 701 vs Olympus E-P5 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 12500
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Leica L Mount
- 384g - 134 x 69 x 33mm
- Announced April 2014
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 420g - 122 x 69 x 37mm
- Announced October 2013
- Replaced the Olympus E-P3
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Leica T Type 701 vs Olympus E-P5 Overview
Following is a in depth overview of the Leica T Type 701 vs Olympus E-P5, former is a Advanced Mirrorless while the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by rivals Leica and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the T Type 701 (16MP) and the E-P5 (16MP) is relatively close but the T Type 701 (APS-C) and E-P5 (Four Thirds) have totally different sensor sizing.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe T Type 701 was announced 7 months after the E-P5 so they are of a similar age. Both of the cameras feature the same body design (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before going into a in-depth comparison, here is a concise summation of how the T Type 701 matches up vs the E-P5 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Leica T Type 701 vs Olympus E-P5 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Leica T Typ 701 & Olympus PEN E-P5. The whole galleries are viewable at Leica T Type 701 Gallery & Olympus E-P5 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Leica T Type 701 over the Olympus E-P5
| T Type 701 | E-P5 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | April 2014 |  | October 2013 | More modern by 7 months |
| Screen size | 3.7" |  | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.7") |
| Screen resolution | 1300k |  | 1037k | Sharper screen (+263k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus E-P5 over the Leica T Type 701
| E-P5 | T Type 701 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Common features in the Leica T Type 701 and Olympus E-P5
| T Type 701 | E-P5 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | More exact focus | ||
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Leica T Type 701 vs Olympus E-P5 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to carry around your camera, you are going to need to consider its weight and dimensions. The Leica T Type 701 has got physical measurements of 134mm x 69mm x 33mm (5.3" x 2.7" x 1.3") and a weight of 384 grams (0.85 lbs) whilst the Olympus E-P5 has dimensions of 122mm x 69mm x 37mm (4.8" x 2.7" x 1.5") accompanied by a weight of 420 grams (0.93 lbs).
Look at the Leica T Type 701 vs Olympus E-P5 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are employing during that time. Here is a front view overall size comparison of the T Type 701 and the E-P5.
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the T Type 701 and E-P5 is 85 and 85 respectively.
Leica T Type 701 vs Olympus E-P5 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it's tough to envision the contrast in sensor sizes just by viewing a spec sheet. The picture here will give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the T Type 701 and E-P5.
As you can see, both of these cameras come with the identical MP albeit not the same sensor sizes. The T Type 701 provides the bigger sensor which should make obtaining bokeh easier. The more recent T Type 701 will have an edge in sensor tech.
Leica T Type 701 vs Olympus E-P5 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Leica T Type 701 vs Olympus E-P5 Specifications
| Leica T Typ 701 | Olympus PEN E-P5 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Leica | Olympus |
| Model | Leica T Typ 701 | Olympus PEN E-P5 |
| Type | Advanced Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
| Announced | 2014-04-24 | 2013-10-03 |
| Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | APS-C | Four Thirds |
| Sensor dimensions | 23.6 x 15.7mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
| Sensor area | 370.5mm² | 224.9mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 16MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 4:3 |
| Highest resolution | 4944 x 3278 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 12500 | 25600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 125 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 35 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | Leica L | Micro Four Thirds |
| Total lenses | 4 | 107 |
| Crop factor | 1.5 | 2.1 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Screen diagonal | 3.7 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 1,300 thousand dots | 1,037 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Screen technology | - | 3:2 LCD capacitive touchscreen |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | Electronic (optional) |
| Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dots | - |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.7x | - |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 30s | 60s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/8000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 5.0 frames per sec | 9.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.50 m (at ISO 100) | 7.00 m (ISO 100) |
| Flash options | Auto, auto w/redeye reduction, flash on, flash on w/redeye reduction, slow sync, slow sync w/redeye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync (1st or 2nd curtain), Manual (1/1 - 1/64) |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Maximum flash synchronize | - | 1/320s |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4 | H.264 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | Optional | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 384 gr (0.85 lb) | 420 gr (0.93 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 134 x 69 x 33mm (5.3" x 2.7" x 1.3") | 122 x 69 x 37mm (4.8" x 2.7" x 1.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | 75 | 72 |
| DXO Color Depth score | 23.0 | 22.8 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 12.7 | 12.4 |
| DXO Low light score | 1082 | 895 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 400 photos | 330 photos |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | BP-DC13 | - |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC card | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at launch | $1,603 | $389 |