Leica T Type 701 vs Olympus E-PL2
85 Imaging
58 Features
56 Overall
57
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/082af/082af5f544755bcbd06b5586c7ba8af1b899da69" alt="Leica T Typ 701 front Leica T Typ 701 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0db25/0db25b50f5db0e38bf19b46696bb0e06a463d704" alt="Olympus PEN E-PL2 front Olympus PEN E-PL2 front"
85 Imaging
47 Features
47 Overall
47
Leica T Type 701 vs Olympus E-PL2 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 12500
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Leica L Mount
- 384g - 134 x 69 x 33mm
- Revealed April 2014
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 362g - 114 x 72 x 42mm
- Launched February 2011
- Replaced the Olympus E-PL1s
- Newer Model is Olympus E-PL3
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Leica T Type 701 vs Olympus E-PL2 Overview
Below is a thorough comparison of the Leica T Type 701 and Olympus E-PL2, one being a Advanced Mirrorless and the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by brands Leica and Olympus. There exists a big gap between the sensor resolutions of the T Type 701 (16MP) and E-PL2 (12MP) and the T Type 701 (APS-C) and E-PL2 (Four Thirds) enjoy totally different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
The T Type 701 was introduced 3 years later than the E-PL2 and that is quite a big gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras come with the identical body type (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before going through a detailed comparison, below is a concise view of how the T Type 701 matches up versus the E-PL2 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Leica T Type 701 vs Olympus E-PL2 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Leica T Typ 701 and Olympus PEN E-PL2. The whole galleries are available at Leica T Type 701 Gallery and Olympus E-PL2 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Leica T Type 701 over the Olympus E-PL2
T Type 701 | E-PL2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | April 2014 | ![]() | February 2011 | More recent by 39 months |
Display dimension | 3.7" | ![]() | 3" | Larger display (+0.7") |
Display resolution | 1300k | ![]() | 460k | Clearer display (+840k dot) |
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL2 over the Leica T Type 701
E-PL2 | T Type 701 |
---|
Common features in the Leica T Type 701 and Olympus E-PL2
T Type 701 | E-PL2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial exact focus | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Absent selfie screen |
Leica T Type 701 vs Olympus E-PL2 Physical Comparison
If you are intending to lug around your camera frequently, you will want to take into account its weight and volume. The Leica T Type 701 features exterior measurements of 134mm x 69mm x 33mm (5.3" x 2.7" x 1.3") along with a weight of 384 grams (0.85 lbs) and the Olympus E-PL2 has sizing of 114mm x 72mm x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") with a weight of 362 grams (0.80 lbs).
See the Leica T Type 701 and Olympus E-PL2 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you select during that time. Below is the front view scale comparison of the T Type 701 vs the E-PL2.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9f82b/9f82bf686088e8f9e04dc2b1072aa044fa5cd0e6" alt="Leica T Type 701 vs Olympus E-PL2 size comparison Leica T Type 701 vs Olympus E-PL2 size comparison"
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the T Type 701 and E-PL2 is 85 and 85 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0018a/0018a8aac934452982ec1f3a2fadfcfd260abc96" alt="Leica T Type 701 vs Olympus E-PL2 top view buttons comparison Leica T Type 701 vs Olympus E-PL2 top view buttons comparison"
Leica T Type 701 vs Olympus E-PL2 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is tough to see the gap between sensor measurements simply by going over specifications. The graphic underneath should give you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the T Type 701 and E-PL2.
To sum up, each of these cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The T Type 701 with its larger sensor will make shooting shallow DOF easier and the Leica T Type 701 will offer you more detail using its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop images somewhat more aggressively. The fresher T Type 701 is going to have a benefit with regard to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/169c3/169c3a5bee052a77f2b56893ebdb0b2b5c04a7fe" alt="Leica T Type 701 vs Olympus E-PL2 sensor size comparison Leica T Type 701 vs Olympus E-PL2 sensor size comparison"
Leica T Type 701 vs Olympus E-PL2 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6dcae/6dcae7365adf664bc5a3d12b04e5c1f768d864da" alt="Leica T Type 701 vs Olympus E-PL2 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Leica T Type 701 vs Olympus E-PL2 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Leica T Type 701 vs Olympus E-PL2 Specifications
Leica T Typ 701 | Olympus PEN E-PL2 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Leica | Olympus |
Model type | Leica T Typ 701 | Olympus PEN E-PL2 |
Class | Advanced Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Revealed | 2014-04-24 | 2011-02-11 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | Truepic V |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | APS-C | Four Thirds |
Sensor measurements | 23.6 x 15.7mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor surface area | 370.5mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 4:3 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4944 x 3278 | 4032 x 3024 |
Maximum native ISO | 12500 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 125 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | - | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Leica L | Micro Four Thirds |
Total lenses | 4 | 107 |
Crop factor | 1.5 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3.7 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 1,300 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen tech | - | HyperCrystal LCD AR(Anti-Reflective) coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | Electronic (optional) |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.7x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 30 seconds | 60 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 5.0 frames per sec | 3.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.50 m (at ISO 100) | 10.00 m |
Flash modes | Auto, auto w/redeye reduction, flash on, flash on w/redeye reduction, slow sync, slow sync w/redeye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | - | 1/160 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | MPEG-4 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Optional | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 384g (0.85 lbs) | 362g (0.80 lbs) |
Dimensions | 134 x 69 x 33mm (5.3" x 2.7" x 1.3") | 114 x 72 x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 75 | 55 |
DXO Color Depth rating | 23.0 | 21.4 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.7 | 10.2 |
DXO Low light rating | 1082 | 573 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 400 images | 280 images |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BP-DC13 | BLS-5 |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card | SD/SDHC |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Cost at release | $1,603 | $0 |