Leica T Type 701 vs Samsung NX2000
85 Imaging
58 Features
56 Overall
57
89 Imaging
62 Features
68 Overall
64
Leica T Type 701 vs Samsung NX2000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 12500
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Leica L Mount
- 384g - 134 x 69 x 33mm
- Introduced April 2014
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Samsung NX Mount
- 228g - 119 x 65 x 36mm
- Launched November 2013
- Old Model is Samsung NX1100
- Newer Model is Samsung NX3000
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Leica T Type 701 vs Samsung NX2000 Overview
In this article, we will be analyzing the Leica T Type 701 vs Samsung NX2000, one is a Advanced Mirrorless and the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by brands Leica and Samsung. The resolution of the T Type 701 (16MP) and the NX2000 (20MP) is pretty close and they enjoy the same exact sensor size (APS-C).
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe T Type 701 was released 5 months after the NX2000 and they are of a similar generation. Both of these cameras offer the identical body type (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before going in to a detailed comparison, below is a quick synopsis of how the T Type 701 grades versus the NX2000 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Leica T Type 701 vs Samsung NX2000 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Leica T Typ 701 and Samsung NX2000. The complete galleries are viewable at Leica T Type 701 Gallery and Samsung NX2000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Leica T Type 701 over the Samsung NX2000
| T Type 701 | NX2000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen resolution | 1300k |  | 1152k | Crisper screen (+148k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung NX2000 over the Leica T Type 701
| NX2000 | T Type 701 |
|---|
Common features in the Leica T Type 701 and Samsung NX2000
| T Type 701 | NX2000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | April 2014 |  | November 2013 | Same generation |
| Manually focus |  | Very accurate focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen sizing | 3.7" |  | 3.7" | Equivalent screen size |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Leica T Type 701 vs Samsung NX2000 Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to carry around your camera regularly, you should factor in its weight and volume. The Leica T Type 701 comes with outer dimensions of 134mm x 69mm x 33mm (5.3" x 2.7" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 384 grams (0.85 lbs) and the Samsung NX2000 has sizing of 119mm x 65mm x 36mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 1.4") and a weight of 228 grams (0.50 lbs).
Look at the Leica T Type 701 vs Samsung NX2000 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are utilising during that time. Underneath is the front view over all size comparison of the T Type 701 compared to the NX2000.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the T Type 701 and NX2000 is 85 and 89 respectively.
Leica T Type 701 vs Samsung NX2000 Sensor Comparison
Normally, its difficult to envision the difference in sensor sizes merely by researching specifications. The pic below will help offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the T Type 701 and NX2000.
Plainly, the two cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same resolution. You should expect the Samsung NX2000 to render more detail as a result of its extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop photographs a little more aggressively.
Leica T Type 701 vs Samsung NX2000 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Leica T Type 701 vs Samsung NX2000 Specifications
| Leica T Typ 701 | Samsung NX2000 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Leica | Samsung |
| Model | Leica T Typ 701 | Samsung NX2000 |
| Category | Advanced Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
| Introduced | 2014-04-24 | 2013-11-30 |
| Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | APS-C | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 23.6 x 15.7mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
| Sensor surface area | 370.5mm² | 369.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4944 x 3278 | 5472 x 3648 |
| Max native ISO | 12500 | 25600 |
| Min native ISO | 125 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 21 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | Leica L | Samsung NX |
| Amount of lenses | 4 | 32 |
| Crop factor | 1.5 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3.7" | 3.7" |
| Screen resolution | 1,300k dot | 1,152k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Screen tech | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
| Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dot | - |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.7x | - |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 30s | 30s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 5.0fps | 8.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.50 m (at ISO 100) | no built-in flash |
| Flash settings | Auto, auto w/redeye reduction, flash on, flash on w/redeye reduction, slow sync, slow sync w/redeye reduction | no built-in flash |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Maximum flash sync | - | 1/180s |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1920 x 810 (24 fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | Optional | Optional |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 384g (0.85 lbs) | 228g (0.50 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 134 x 69 x 33mm (5.3" x 2.7" x 1.3") | 119 x 65 x 36mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 1.4") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | 75 | 75 |
| DXO Color Depth score | 23.0 | 23.4 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 12.7 | 12.3 |
| DXO Low light score | 1082 | 908 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 400 shots | 340 shots |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | BP-DC13 | BP1130 |
| Self timer | Yes | - |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card | MicroSD/ MicroSDHC/ MicroSDXC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at launch | $1,603 | $599 |