Leica TL vs Olympus E-PM2
85 Imaging
60 Features
58 Overall
59
89 Imaging
52 Features
63 Overall
56
Leica TL vs Olympus E-PM2 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12500
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Leica L Mount
- 384g - 134 x 69 x 33mm
- Announced November 2016
- Refreshed by Leica TL2
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 269g - 110 x 64 x 34mm
- Released May 2013
- Superseded the Olympus E-PM1
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Leica TL vs Olympus E-PM2 Overview
Below is a extended analysis of the Leica TL vs Olympus E-PM2, former being a Advanced Mirrorless while the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by competitors Leica and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the TL (16MP) and the E-PM2 (16MP) is fairly well matched but the TL (APS-C) and E-PM2 (Four Thirds) provide totally different sensor measurements.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe TL was revealed 3 years later than the E-PM2 and that is quite a significant difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras feature the same body design (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before going straight to a complete comparison, here is a quick view of how the TL grades vs the E-PM2 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Leica TL vs Olympus E-PM2 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Leica TL & Olympus PEN E-PM2. The full galleries are viewable at Leica TL Gallery & Olympus E-PM2 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Leica TL over the Olympus E-PM2
| TL | E-PM2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | November 2016 |  | May 2013 | More recent by 43 months |
| Display size | 3.7" |  | 3" | Larger display (+0.7") |
| Display resolution | 1230k |  | 460k | Sharper display (+770k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PM2 over the Leica TL
| E-PM2 | TL |
|---|
Common features in the Leica TL and Olympus E-PM2
| TL | E-PM2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Very accurate focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Easily navigate |
Leica TL vs Olympus E-PM2 Physical Comparison
In case you're going to lug around your camera often, you have to think about its weight and size. The Leica TL offers outside dimensions of 134mm x 69mm x 33mm (5.3" x 2.7" x 1.3") along with a weight of 384 grams (0.85 lbs) and the Olympus E-PM2 has specifications of 110mm x 64mm x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") and a weight of 269 grams (0.59 lbs).
See the Leica TL vs Olympus E-PM2 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you have attached at that time. Following is a front view size comparison of the TL against the E-PM2.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the TL and E-PM2 is 85 and 89 respectively.
Leica TL vs Olympus E-PM2 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is very difficult to see the gap between sensor measurements just by looking at specs. The visual below will offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the TL and E-PM2.
All in all, the two cameras feature the identical megapixels but not the same sensor measurements. The TL provides the larger sensor which should make getting shallower depth of field less difficult. The fresher TL will have a benefit in sensor tech.
Leica TL vs Olympus E-PM2 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Leica TL vs Olympus E-PM2 Specifications
| Leica TL | Olympus PEN E-PM2 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Leica | Olympus |
| Model | Leica TL | Olympus PEN E-PM2 |
| Category | Advanced Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
| Announced | 2016-11-08 | 2013-05-21 |
| Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | APS-C | Four Thirds |
| Sensor measurements | 23.6 x 15.7mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
| Sensor area | 370.5mm² | 224.9mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 16MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 4:3 |
| Max resolution | 4928 x 3264 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 12500 | 25600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 200 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 35 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | Leica L | Micro Four Thirds |
| Total lenses | 4 | 107 |
| Crop factor | 1.5 | 2.1 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3.7" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 1,230k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | Electronic (optional) |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 30 secs | 60 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | 5.0 frames per sec | 8.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.50 m (at ISO 100) | 7.00 m (bundled FL-LM1) |
| Flash options | Auto, auto w/redeye reduction, on, off, slow sync, slow sync w/redeye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Max flash synchronize | - | 1/250 secs |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | MPEG-4 | MPEG-4, H.264, Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | Optional | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 384 gr (0.85 pounds) | 269 gr (0.59 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 134 x 69 x 33mm (5.3" x 2.7" x 1.3") | 110 x 64 x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | 72 |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 22.7 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.2 |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 932 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 400 photographs | 360 photographs |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | BP-DC13 | BLS-5 |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch pricing | $1,009 | $448 |