Leica TL2 vs Olympus E-PL9
85 Imaging
67 Features
64 Overall
65


85 Imaging
55 Features
78 Overall
64
Leica TL2 vs Olympus E-PL9 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 50000
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Leica L Mount
- 399g - 134 x 69 x 33mm
- Released July 2017
- Older Model is Leica TL
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 6400 (Bump to 25600)
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 380g - 117 x 68 x 39mm
- Released February 2018
- Previous Model is Olympus E-PL8

Leica TL2 vs Olympus E-PL9 Overview
The following is a in-depth overview of the Leica TL2 versus Olympus E-PL9, one is a Advanced Mirrorless and the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by rivals Leica and Olympus. There exists a huge gap between the sensor resolutions of the TL2 (24MP) and E-PL9 (16MP) and the TL2 (APS-C) and E-PL9 (Four Thirds) possess totally different sensor sizing.

The TL2 was released 7 months prior to the E-PL9 which means that they are of a similar generation. The two cameras come with the identical body type (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before getting straight into a in-depth comparison, below is a brief summary of how the TL2 scores vs the E-PL9 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Leica TL2 vs Olympus E-PL9 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Leica TL2 and Olympus PEN E-PL9. The complete galleries are viewable at Leica TL2 Gallery and Olympus E-PL9 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Leica TL2 over the Olympus E-PL9
TL2 | E-PL9 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen dimension | 3.7" | ![]() | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.7") |
Screen resolution | 1230k | ![]() | 1040k | Clearer screen (+190k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL9 over the Leica TL2
E-PL9 | TL2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | February 2018 | ![]() | July 2017 | Newer by 7 months |
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Common features in the Leica TL2 and Olympus E-PL9
TL2 | E-PL9 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | More exact focusing | ||
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lacking selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Leica TL2 vs Olympus E-PL9 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to travel with your camera frequently, you're going to have to factor its weight and proportions. The Leica TL2 comes with physical measurements of 134mm x 69mm x 33mm (5.3" x 2.7" x 1.3") and a weight of 399 grams (0.88 lbs) while the Olympus E-PL9 has measurements of 117mm x 68mm x 39mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.5") and a weight of 380 grams (0.84 lbs).
Check the Leica TL2 versus Olympus E-PL9 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you have chosen during that time. Underneath is the front view size comparison of the TL2 compared to the E-PL9.

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the TL2 and E-PL9 is 85 and 85 respectively.

Leica TL2 vs Olympus E-PL9 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it can be tough to see the gap between sensor dimensions simply by reading technical specs. The picture here might give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the TL2 and E-PL9.
As you have seen, the two cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The TL2 featuring a bigger sensor will make achieving shallower DOF less difficult and the Leica TL2 will offer extra detail as a result of its extra 8MP. Higher resolution will help you crop pictures somewhat more aggressively. The more aged TL2 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.

Leica TL2 vs Olympus E-PL9 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Leica TL2 vs Olympus E-PL9 Specifications
Leica TL2 | Olympus PEN E-PL9 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Leica | Olympus |
Model type | Leica TL2 | Olympus PEN E-PL9 |
Class | Advanced Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Released | 2017-07-10 | 2018-02-08 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | TruePic VIII |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | APS-C | Four Thirds |
Sensor dimensions | 23.6 x 15.7mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor surface area | 370.5mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 24 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 6016 x 4014 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 50000 | 6400 |
Highest boosted ISO | - | 25600 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 200 |
RAW photos | ||
Minimum boosted ISO | - | 100 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | 49 | 121 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Leica L | Micro Four Thirds |
Total lenses | 4 | 107 |
Crop factor | 1.5 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen size | 3.7 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 1,230k dots | 1,040k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 30 seconds | 60 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Maximum silent shutter speed | 1/40000 seconds | 1/16000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 7.0fps | 8.6fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 7.60 m (at ISO 200) |
Flash modes | no built-in flash | Auto, manual, redeye reduction, slow sync w/redeye reduction, slow sync , slow sync 2nd-curtain, fill-in, off |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p, MP4, H.264, AAC | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
Highest video resolution | 3840x2160 | 3840x2160 |
Video data format | MPEG-4 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Optional | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 399 grams (0.88 lb) | 380 grams (0.84 lb) |
Dimensions | 134 x 69 x 33mm (5.3" x 2.7" x 1.3") | 117 x 68 x 39mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 250 photographs | 350 photographs |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BP-DC13 | - |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I supported) |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Cost at launch | $2,195 | $599 |