Leica V-Lux 2 vs Olympus SP-565UZ
67 Imaging
36 Features
52 Overall
42
72 Imaging
32 Features
32 Overall
32
Leica V-Lux 2 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-600mm (F2.8-5.2) lens
- 520g - 124 x 80 x 95mm
- Announced September 2010
- Refreshed by Leica V-Lux 3
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-520mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
- 413g - 116 x 84 x 81mm
- Released January 2009
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Leica V-Lux 2 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Overview
On this page, we are contrasting the Leica V-Lux 2 versus Olympus SP-565UZ, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by companies Leica and Olympus. There is a noticeable difference between the sensor resolutions of the V-Lux 2 (14MP) and SP-565UZ (10MP) but both cameras provide the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe V-Lux 2 was manufactured 21 months after the SP-565UZ making them a generation away from each other. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Leica V-Lux 2 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Olympus SP-565UZ being a Compact camera.
Before going into a detailed comparison, here is a short synopsis of how the V-Lux 2 matches up vs the SP-565UZ in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Leica V-Lux 2 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Leica V-Lux 2 & Olympus SP-565UZ. The entire galleries are viewable at Leica V-Lux 2 Gallery & Olympus SP-565UZ Gallery.
Reasons to pick Leica V-Lux 2 over the Olympus SP-565UZ
| V-Lux 2 | SP-565UZ | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | September 2010 | January 2009 | Newer by 21 months | |
| Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating display | |
| Display dimensions | 3" | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") | |
| Display resolution | 460k | 230k | Sharper display (+230k dot) | |
| Selfie screen | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-565UZ over the Leica V-Lux 2
| SP-565UZ | V-Lux 2 |
|---|
Common features in the Leica V-Lux 2 and Olympus SP-565UZ
| V-Lux 2 | SP-565UZ | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | Very accurate focusing | |||
| Touch friendly display | Absent Touch friendly display |
Leica V-Lux 2 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to travel with your camera often, you should consider its weight and dimensions. The Leica V-Lux 2 offers physical dimensions of 124mm x 80mm x 95mm (4.9" x 3.1" x 3.7") along with a weight of 520 grams (1.15 lbs) while the Olympus SP-565UZ has dimensions of 116mm x 84mm x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") along with a weight of 413 grams (0.91 lbs).
See the Leica V-Lux 2 versus Olympus SP-565UZ in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you have during that time. Below is a front view scale comparison of the V-Lux 2 against the SP-565UZ.

Using size and weight, the portability grade of the V-Lux 2 and SP-565UZ is 67 and 72 respectively.
Leica V-Lux 2 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Sensor Comparison
In many cases, its hard to imagine the difference between sensor dimensions purely by reviewing specs. The pic here should offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the V-Lux 2 and SP-565UZ.
As you can plainly see, both cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but different megapixels. You can expect to see the Leica V-Lux 2 to offer extra detail due to its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also help you crop photos more aggressively. The younger V-Lux 2 provides an advantage when it comes to sensor tech.
Leica V-Lux 2 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Leica V-Lux 2 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Specifications
| Leica V-Lux 2 | Olympus SP-565UZ | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Leica | Olympus |
| Model type | Leica V-Lux 2 | Olympus SP-565UZ |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Announced | 2010-09-21 | 2009-01-15 |
| Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 10MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 64 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Total focus points | - | 143 |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-600mm (24.0x) | 26-520mm (20.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.8-5.2 | f/2.8-4.5 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 2.5 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 460 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 1s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 11.0 frames/s | 1.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 9.50 m | 6.40 m (ISO 200) |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 @ 30 fps/15 fps, 320 x 240 @ 30 fps/15 fps |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | AVCHD Lite | - |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 520 grams (1.15 pounds) | 413 grams (0.91 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 124 x 80 x 95mm (4.9" x 3.1" x 3.7") | 116 x 84 x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | 30 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 18.7 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 10.1 |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 68 |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | - | 4 x AA |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (12 or 2 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | xD Picture Card, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at launch | $1,000 | $400 |