Leica V-Lux 2 vs Olympus VR-320
67 Imaging
36 Features
52 Overall
42
94 Imaging
37 Features
35 Overall
36
Leica V-Lux 2 vs Olympus VR-320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-600mm (F2.8-5.2) lens
- 520g - 124 x 80 x 95mm
- Launched September 2010
- Newer Model is Leica V-Lux 3
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Announced July 2011
- Replacement is Olympus VR-330
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Leica V-Lux 2 vs Olympus VR-320 Overview
Here, we are analyzing the Leica V-Lux 2 versus Olympus VR-320, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by competitors Leica and Olympus. The resolution of the V-Lux 2 (14MP) and the VR-320 (14MP) is very similar and both cameras posses the identical sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe V-Lux 2 was introduced 10 months before the VR-320 and they are both of a similar age. Both the cameras feature different body design with the Leica V-Lux 2 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Olympus VR-320 being a Compact camera.
Before we go straight to a thorough comparison, here is a quick introduction of how the V-Lux 2 matches up against the VR-320 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Leica V-Lux 2 vs Olympus VR-320 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Leica V-Lux 2 & Olympus VR-320. The whole galleries are provided at Leica V-Lux 2 Gallery & Olympus VR-320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Leica V-Lux 2 over the Olympus VR-320
| V-Lux 2 | VR-320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | Very accurate focus | |||
| Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating display | |
| Display resolution | 460k | 230k | Crisper display (+230k dot) | |
| Selfie screen | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Leica V-Lux 2
| VR-320 | V-Lux 2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | July 2011 | September 2010 | Fresher by 10 months |
Common features in the Leica V-Lux 2 and Olympus VR-320
| V-Lux 2 | VR-320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display size | 3" | 3" | Same display measurements | |
| Touch display | Neither contains Touch display |
Leica V-Lux 2 vs Olympus VR-320 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to carry your camera often, you need to factor in its weight and measurements. The Leica V-Lux 2 has got physical dimensions of 124mm x 80mm x 95mm (4.9" x 3.1" x 3.7") and a weight of 520 grams (1.15 lbs) whilst the Olympus VR-320 has proportions of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).
Analyze the Leica V-Lux 2 versus Olympus VR-320 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are utilizing during that time. The following is a front view overall size comparison of the V-Lux 2 and the VR-320.

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the V-Lux 2 and VR-320 is 67 and 94 respectively.
Leica V-Lux 2 vs Olympus VR-320 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is hard to envision the gap between sensor sizing just by reviewing specifications. The photograph below will help provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the V-Lux 2 and VR-320.
To sum up, both the cameras feature the identical sensor size and the identical MP and you can expect similar quality of photos but you will need to factor the age of the products into consideration. The older V-Lux 2 is going to be behind in sensor technology.
Leica V-Lux 2 vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Leica V-Lux 2 vs Olympus VR-320 Specifications
| Leica V-Lux 2 | Olympus VR-320 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Leica | Olympus |
| Model | Leica V-Lux 2 | Olympus VR-320 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2010-09-21 | 2011-07-19 |
| Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | - | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
| Maximum resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-600mm (24.0x) | 24-300mm (12.5x) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.8-5.2 | f/3.0-5.9 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 460 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Screen technology | - | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 4s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 11.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 9.50 m | 4.70 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | AVCHD Lite | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 520 grams (1.15 lbs) | 158 grams (0.35 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 124 x 80 x 95mm (4.9" x 3.1" x 3.7") | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | - | LI-42B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | SD/SDHC |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at launch | $1,000 | $179 |