Leica V-Lux 3 vs Samsung WB800F
67 Imaging
36 Features
57 Overall
44
92 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
Leica V-Lux 3 vs Samsung WB800F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-600mm (F2.8-5.2) lens
- 540g - 124 x 81 x 95mm
- Revealed December 2011
- Earlier Model is Leica V-Lux 2
- Renewed by Leica V-Lux 4
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 218g - 111 x 65 x 22mm
- Announced January 2013
Leica V-Lux 3 vs Samsung WB800F Overview
In this article, we are contrasting the Leica V-Lux 3 versus Samsung WB800F, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by companies Leica and Samsung. There exists a noticeable gap among the resolutions of the V-Lux 3 (12MP) and WB800F (16MP) but they enjoy the same exact sensor size (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe V-Lux 3 was unveiled 13 months earlier than the WB800F making the cameras a generation apart from one another. Each of the cameras offer different body type with the Leica V-Lux 3 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Samsung WB800F being a Compact camera.
Before going in to a complete comparison, below is a brief summary of how the V-Lux 3 scores vs the WB800F in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Leica V-Lux 3 vs Samsung WB800F Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Leica V-Lux 3 & Samsung WB800F. The full galleries are provided at Leica V-Lux 3 Gallery & Samsung WB800F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Leica V-Lux 3 over the Samsung WB800F
V-Lux 3 | WB800F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating display | |
Display resolution | 461k | 460k | Sharper display (+1k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB800F over the Leica V-Lux 3
WB800F | V-Lux 3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | January 2013 | December 2011 | Fresher by 13 months | |
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Leica V-Lux 3 and Samsung WB800F
V-Lux 3 | WB800F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Dial accurate focus | |||
Display sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent display size |
Leica V-Lux 3 vs Samsung WB800F Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to carry your camera frequently, you have to take into account its weight and proportions. The Leica V-Lux 3 has got exterior dimensions of 124mm x 81mm x 95mm (4.9" x 3.2" x 3.7") having a weight of 540 grams (1.19 lbs) while the Samsung WB800F has measurements of 111mm x 65mm x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") having a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs).
Check out the Leica V-Lux 3 versus Samsung WB800F in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are employing at that moment. Underneath is the front view overall size comparison of the V-Lux 3 versus the WB800F.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the V-Lux 3 and WB800F is 67 and 92 respectively.
Leica V-Lux 3 vs Samsung WB800F Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is tough to picture the contrast in sensor sizing simply by viewing specs. The photograph here will offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the V-Lux 3 and WB800F.
As you can plainly see, both of the cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing but different megapixels. You can expect to see the Samsung WB800F to result in more detail having an extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will enable you to crop images far more aggressively. The older V-Lux 3 will be behind in sensor innovation.
Leica V-Lux 3 vs Samsung WB800F Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Leica V-Lux 3 vs Samsung WB800F Specifications
Leica V-Lux 3 | Samsung WB800F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Leica | Samsung |
Model type | Leica V-Lux 3 | Samsung WB800F |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2011-12-08 | 2013-01-07 |
Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Highest resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Total focus points | 23 | - |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 25-600mm (24.0x) | 23-483mm (21.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/2.8-5.2 | f/2.8-5.9 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 461k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Display tech | - | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 30 seconds | 16 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 12.0 frames per second | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 9.50 m | - |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | - |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (220 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MPEG-4, AVCHD, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 540 gr (1.19 pounds) | 218 gr (0.48 pounds) |
Dimensions | 124 x 81 x 95mm (4.9" x 3.2" x 3.7") | 111 x 65 x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 410 shots | - |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | BP-DC 9 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 pictures)) | Yes |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Price at launch | $949 | $300 |