Leica V-Lux 30 vs Olympus VR-320
Portability
90 Imaging
37 Features
46 Overall
40
90 Imaging
37 Features
46 Overall
40
Portability
94 Imaging
37 Features
35 Overall
36
94 Imaging
37 Features
35 Overall
36
Leica V-Lux 30 vs Olympus VR-320 Key Specs
Leica V-Lux 30
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-384mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 219g - 105 x 58 x 43mm
- Introduced May 2011
Olympus VR-320
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Announced July 2011
- Successor is Olympus VR-330
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Leica V-Lux 30 vs Olympus VR-320 Overview
Below is a complete analysis of the Leica V-Lux 30 and Olympus VR-320, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by rivals Leica and Olympus. The image resolution of the V-Lux 30 (14MP) and the VR-320 (14MP) is very similar and both cameras posses the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe V-Lux 30 was released very close to the VR-320 and they are both of a similar age. Both of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before we go right into a step-by-step comparison, here is a quick overview of how the V-Lux 30 grades vs the VR-320 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Leica V-Lux 30 vs Olympus VR-320 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Leica V-Lux 30 & Olympus VR-320. The complete galleries are viewable at Leica V-Lux 30 Gallery & Olympus VR-320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Leica V-Lux 30 over the Olympus VR-320
| V-Lux 30 | VR-320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+230k dot) |
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Leica V-Lux 30
| VR-320 | V-Lux 30 |
|---|
Common features in the Leica V-Lux 30 and Olympus VR-320
| V-Lux 30 | VR-320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | May 2011 |  | July 2011 | Similar age |
| Manually focus |  | No manual focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal display dimensions |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither has selfie screen |
Leica V-Lux 30 vs Olympus VR-320 Physical Comparison
For those who are going to lug around your camera regularly, you should factor its weight and size. The Leica V-Lux 30 has outside dimensions of 105mm x 58mm x 43mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.7") having a weight of 219 grams (0.48 lbs) while the Olympus VR-320 has specifications of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).
Contrast the Leica V-Lux 30 and Olympus VR-320 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are employing during that time. Underneath is a front view overall size comparison of the V-Lux 30 compared to the VR-320.
Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the V-Lux 30 and VR-320 is 90 and 94 respectively.
Leica V-Lux 30 vs Olympus VR-320 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it can be hard to picture the gap between sensor measurements merely by reviewing technical specs. The visual below might give you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the V-Lux 30 and VR-320.
As you can tell, each of the cameras have the same sensor dimensions and the exact same megapixels and you can expect similar quality of images though you should really consider the launch date of the products into consideration.
Leica V-Lux 30 vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Leica V-Lux 30 as a Portrait photography camera
Olympus VR-320 as a Portrait photography camera
resolution is good (14 megapixels)
lack of manual focus
cannot use external flash
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
good resolution (14 megapixels)
features face detect focus
focusing manually not possible
manual mode not possible
external flash not possible
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Street photography with Leica V-Lux 30
Street photography with Olympus VR-320
image stabilization (Optical)
comes with focus by touch
lighter than competition in class (219g)
screen does not articulate
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competition in class (158 grams)
fixed screen
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Leica V-Lux 30 as a Sports photography camera
Olympus VR-320 as a Sports photography camera
great zoom range (24-384mm 16.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Optical)
resolution is good (14MP)
has tracking autofocus
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
terrible battery (260 shots)
lacks phase detect AF
amazing zoom range (24-300mm 12.5 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good resolution (14MP)
features tracking focus
no shutter priority
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
has no phase detect auto focus
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Leica V-Lux 30 Travel photography factors
Olympus VR-320 Travel photography factors
lighter than competition in class (219g)
comes with focus by touch
resolution is good (14MP)
flash built-in
relatively wide (24mm)
great reach (384mm)
lack of Timelapse mode
terrible battery (260 CIPA)
doesn't have a selfie friendly display
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.3)
lighter than competition in class (158g)
good resolution (14MP)
built-in flash
decently wide (24mm)
long reach (300mm)
no Timelapse mode
display is not selfie friendly
slow max aperture (f3.0)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Landscape photography with Leica V-Lux 30
Landscape photography with Olympus VR-320
relatively wide (24mm)
pretty good screen size (3 inches)
image stabilization (Optical)
resolution is good (14MP)
lack of manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.3)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
terrible battery (260 shots)
lack of Timelapse mode
decently wide (24mm)
screen is a good size (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good resolution (14 megapixels)
focusing manually not possible
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.0)
manual mode not possible
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
no Timelapse mode
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Leica V-Lux 30 Vlogging advice
Olympus VR-320 Vlogging advice
relatively wide (24mm)
touchscreen enabled
image stabilization (Optical)
video res high (1920 x 1080 pxls)
lighter than competition in class (219 grams)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.3)
doesn't have a selfie friendly display
lack of external microphone socket
decently wide (24mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
features face detect focus
lighter than competition in class (158 grams)
slow max aperture (f3.0)
display is not selfie friendly
video resolution low (1280 x 720 pixels)
no microphone port
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Leica V-Lux 30 vs Olympus VR-320 Specifications
| Leica V-Lux 30 | Olympus VR-320 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Leica | Olympus |
| Model type | Leica V-Lux 30 | Olympus VR-320 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2011-05-26 | 2011-07-19 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | Venus Engine FHD | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 14MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
| Maximum resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Total focus points | 11 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-384mm (16.0x) | 24-300mm (12.5x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.3-5.9 | f/3.0-5.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 3cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 460k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Display tech | - | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 60s | 4s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 10.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 5.00 m | 4.70 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, AVCHD | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 219 grams (0.48 pounds) | 158 grams (0.35 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 105 x 58 x 43mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.7") | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 260 photos | - |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | - | LI-42B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | SD/SDHC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at launch | $900 | $179 |