Leica V-Lux 4 vs Olympus SP-820UZ
Portability
65 Imaging
36 Features
62 Overall
46
65 Imaging
36 Features
62 Overall
46
Portability
69 Imaging
38 Features
29 Overall
34
69 Imaging
38 Features
29 Overall
34
Leica V-Lux 4 vs Olympus SP-820UZ Key Specs
Leica V-Lux 4
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Expand to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-600mm (F2.8) lens
- 588g - 125 x 87 x 110mm
- Announced September 2012
- Replaced the Leica V-Lux 3
- Updated by Leica V-Lux 5
Olympus SP-820UZ
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 22-896mm (F3.4-5.7) lens
- 485g - 117 x 78 x 93mm
- Revealed August 2012
- Older Model is Olympus SP-820UZ
- Replacement is Olympus SP-820UZ
Photography Glossary Leica V-Lux 4 vs Olympus SP-820UZ Overview
Lets look more in depth at the Leica V-Lux 4 versus Olympus SP-820UZ, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by rivals Leica and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the V-Lux 4 (12MP) and the SP-820UZ (14MP) is relatively close and both cameras offer the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe V-Lux 4 was revealed around the same time to the SP-820UZ and they are both of a similar age. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Leica V-Lux 4 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Olympus SP-820UZ being a Compact camera.
Before going straight to a thorough comparison, here is a brief summary of how the V-Lux 4 scores vs the SP-820UZ in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Leica V-Lux 4 vs Olympus SP-820UZ Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Leica V-Lux 4 & Olympus Stylus SP-820UZ. The full galleries are viewable at Leica V-Lux 4 Gallery & Olympus SP-820UZ Gallery.
Reasons to pick Leica V-Lux 4 over the Olympus SP-820UZ
| V-Lux 4 | SP-820UZ | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Very precise focus | ||
| Screen type | Fully Articulated |  | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-820UZ over the Leica V-Lux 4
| SP-820UZ | V-Lux 4 |
|---|
Common features in the Leica V-Lux 4 and Olympus SP-820UZ
| V-Lux 4 | SP-820UZ | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | September 2012 |  | August 2012 | Same age |
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal screen sizing |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 460k | Same screen resolution |
| Touch screen |  | Absent Touch screen |
Leica V-Lux 4 vs Olympus SP-820UZ Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to carry your camera, you have to think about its weight and measurements. The Leica V-Lux 4 has got outer measurements of 125mm x 87mm x 110mm (4.9" x 3.4" x 4.3") and a weight of 588 grams (1.30 lbs) whilst the Olympus SP-820UZ has proportions of 117mm x 78mm x 93mm (4.6" x 3.1" x 3.7") accompanied by a weight of 485 grams (1.07 lbs).
Analyze the Leica V-Lux 4 versus Olympus SP-820UZ in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you choose at that time. Following is a front view sizing comparison of the V-Lux 4 vs the SP-820UZ.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the V-Lux 4 and SP-820UZ is 65 and 69 respectively.
Leica V-Lux 4 vs Olympus SP-820UZ Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it's tough to visualise the difference in sensor sizing merely by viewing technical specs. The visual here will help give you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the V-Lux 4 and SP-820UZ.
As you can tell, each of the cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same resolution. You can count on the Olympus SP-820UZ to provide you with more detail because of its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop photographs a bit more aggressively.
Leica V-Lux 4 vs Olympus SP-820UZ Screen and ViewFinder
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Portrait photography with Leica V-Lux 4
Portrait photography with Olympus SP-820UZ
focusing manually
supports face detect autofocus
delivers RAW files
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
decent MP (14MP)
supports face detection focus
no manual focus
lack of manual mode
no external flash support
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Leica V-Lux 4 Street photography details
Olympus SP-820UZ Street photography details
screen can move to multiple angles
has image stabilization (Optical)
delivers RAW files
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
heavier than competitors in class (588g)
no moving screen
no image stabilization
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
heavier than average (485 grams)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Leica V-Lux 4 as a Sports photography camera
Olympus SP-820UZ as a Sports photography camera
long zoom range (25-600mm 24.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Optical)
supports tracking focus
better than average battery life (540 per charge)
megapixel count low (12MP)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
has no phase detect autofocus
excellent zoom range (22-896mm 40.7 x zoom)
decent MP (14 megapixels)
low fps (2.0 frames/s)
no shutter priority
no image stabilization
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect auto focus
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Leica V-Lux 4 Travel photography factors
Olympus SP-820UZ Travel photography factors
better than average battery life (540 per charge)
flash built-in
selfie friendly screen
reasonably wide (25mm)
very long zoom (600mm)
does not have Time Lapse mode
heavier than competitors in class (588 grams)
megapixel count low (12MP)
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
decent MP (14 megapixels)
built-in flash
really wide (22mm)
long reach (896mm)
lack of Time Lapse mode
heavier than average (485g)
screen is not selfie friendly
slow maximum aperture (f3.4)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Leica V-Lux 4 Landscape photography factors
Olympus SP-820UZ Landscape photography factors
focusing manually
reasonably wide (25mm)
pretty good screen size (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Optical)
delivers RAW files
better than average battery life (540 shots)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
does not have Time Lapse mode
really wide (22mm)
screen size is decent (3")
decent MP (14MP)
no manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.4)
lack of manual mode
no image stabilization
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
lack of Time Lapse mode
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Leica V-Lux 4 Vlogging advice
Olympus SP-820UZ Vlogging advice
reasonably wide (25mm)
selfie friendly screen
has image stabilization (Optical)
supports face detect autofocus
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 pxls)
has mic socket
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
heavier than competitors in class (588 grams)
really wide (22mm)
supports face detection focus
high quality video (1920 x 1080 pixels)
slow maximum aperture (f3.4)
screen is not selfie friendly
no image stabilization
lack of external mic port
heavier than average (485g)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Leica V-Lux 4 vs Olympus SP-820UZ Specifications
| Leica V-Lux 4 | Olympus Stylus SP-820UZ | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Leica | Olympus |
| Model type | Leica V-Lux 4 | Olympus Stylus SP-820UZ |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Announced | 2012-09-17 | 2012-08-21 |
| Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 14MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Maximum enhanced ISO | 6400 | - |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | 23 | - |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-600mm (24.0x) | 22-896mm (40.7x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.8 | f/3.4-5.7 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 460 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Screen technology | Free-Angle TFT Screen LCD Display | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder resolution | 1,312 thousand dot | - |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 60 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 12.0 frames/s | 2.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 13.50 m | 15.00 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60, 50, 30, 25 fps), 1280 x 720p (60, 50, 30, 25 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 25 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 320 x 180 (30, 240 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, AVCHD | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 588 grams (1.30 lb) | 485 grams (1.07 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 125 x 87 x 110mm (4.9" x 3.4" x 4.3") | 117 x 78 x 93mm (4.6" x 3.1" x 3.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 540 photographs | - |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at release | $899 | $299 |
