Leica V-Lux 4 vs Ricoh CX2
65 Imaging
36 Features
62 Overall
46
93 Imaging
32 Features
35 Overall
33
Leica V-Lux 4 vs Ricoh CX2 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Raise to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-600mm (F2.8) lens
- 588g - 125 x 87 x 110mm
- Released September 2012
- Succeeded the Leica V-Lux 3
- Updated by Leica V-Lux 5
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 185g - 102 x 58 x 29mm
- Revealed August 2009
Leica V-Lux 4 vs Ricoh CX2 Overview
Following is a complete assessment of the Leica V-Lux 4 versus Ricoh CX2, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by brands Leica and Ricoh. There is a considerable difference among the image resolutions of the V-Lux 4 (12MP) and CX2 (9MP) but both cameras have the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe V-Lux 4 was launched 3 years after the CX2 which is a fairly large difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Leica V-Lux 4 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Ricoh CX2 being a Compact camera.
Before going straight to a step-by-step comparison, here is a brief highlight of how the V-Lux 4 grades versus the CX2 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Leica V-Lux 4 vs Ricoh CX2 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Leica V-Lux 4 & Ricoh CX2. The complete galleries are available at Leica V-Lux 4 Gallery & Ricoh CX2 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Leica V-Lux 4 over the Ricoh CX2
V-Lux 4 | CX2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | September 2012 | August 2009 | More modern by 38 months | |
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
Selfie screen | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX2 over the Leica V-Lux 4
CX2 | V-Lux 4 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 920k | 460k | Crisper screen (+460k dot) |
Common features in the Leica V-Lux 4 and Ricoh CX2
V-Lux 4 | CX2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | More precise focusing | |||
Screen dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal screen dimensions | |
Touch screen | Neither has Touch screen |
Leica V-Lux 4 vs Ricoh CX2 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to carry around your camera, you will want to factor its weight and dimensions. The Leica V-Lux 4 has physical measurements of 125mm x 87mm x 110mm (4.9" x 3.4" x 4.3") with a weight of 588 grams (1.30 lbs) whilst the Ricoh CX2 has dimensions of 102mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 185 grams (0.41 lbs).
Compare the Leica V-Lux 4 versus Ricoh CX2 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you use during that time. Following is a front view over all size comparison of the V-Lux 4 versus the CX2.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the V-Lux 4 and CX2 is 65 and 93 respectively.
Leica V-Lux 4 vs Ricoh CX2 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it can be difficult to imagine the difference in sensor sizes purely by checking out specifications. The image below might offer you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the V-Lux 4 and CX2.
To sum up, both the cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit different megapixels. You can count on the Leica V-Lux 4 to provide greater detail utilizing its extra 3MP. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop shots a bit more aggressively. The more modern V-Lux 4 should have an advantage in sensor innovation.
Leica V-Lux 4 vs Ricoh CX2 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Leica V-Lux 4 vs Ricoh CX2 Specifications
Leica V-Lux 4 | Ricoh CX2 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Leica | Ricoh |
Model | Leica V-Lux 4 | Ricoh CX2 |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Released | 2012-09-17 | 2009-08-20 |
Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 9 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3456 x 2592 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
Maximum enhanced ISO | 6400 | - |
Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 23 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 25-600mm (24.0x) | 28-300mm (10.7x) |
Highest aperture | f/2.8 | f/3.5-5.6 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 460 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Screen technology | Free-Angle TFT Screen LCD Display | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 1,312 thousand dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60s | 8s |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter rate | 12.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 13.50 m | 3.00 m (ISO 400) |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60, 50, 30, 25 fps), 1280 x 720p (60, 50, 30, 25 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 25 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, AVCHD | Motion JPEG |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 588 gr (1.30 lbs) | 185 gr (0.41 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 125 x 87 x 110mm (4.9" x 3.4" x 4.3") | 102 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 540 images | - |
Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | - | DB-70 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Cost at release | $899 | $341 |