Leica V-Lux 40 vs Olympus VR-320
92 Imaging
37 Features
48 Overall
41
94 Imaging
37 Features
35 Overall
36
Leica V-Lux 40 vs Olympus VR-320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-480mm (F3.3-6.4) lens
- 210g - 105 x 59 x 28mm
- Revealed May 2012
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Introduced July 2011
- Successor is Olympus VR-330
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Leica V-Lux 40 vs Olympus VR-320 Overview
On this page, we are matching up the Leica V-Lux 40 and Olympus VR-320, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by companies Leica and Olympus. The resolution of the V-Lux 40 (14MP) and the VR-320 (14MP) is very close and both cameras have the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe V-Lux 40 was revealed 10 months later than the VR-320 which means that they are both of a similar age. The two cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before going into a in depth comparison, here is a simple synopsis of how the V-Lux 40 scores versus the VR-320 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Leica V-Lux 40 vs Olympus VR-320 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Leica V-Lux 40 & Olympus VR-320. The full galleries are available at Leica V-Lux 40 Gallery & Olympus VR-320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Leica V-Lux 40 over the Olympus VR-320
| V-Lux 40 | VR-320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | May 2012 | July 2011 | Fresher by 10 months | |
| Display resolution | 461k | 230k | Crisper display (+231k dot) | |
| Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Leica V-Lux 40
| VR-320 | V-Lux 40 |
|---|
Common features in the Leica V-Lux 40 and Olympus VR-320
| V-Lux 40 | VR-320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | No manual focusing | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Display dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal display sizing | |
| Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen |
Leica V-Lux 40 vs Olympus VR-320 Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to carry your camera regularly, you'll have to take into account its weight and proportions. The Leica V-Lux 40 enjoys exterior dimensions of 105mm x 59mm x 28mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 210 grams (0.46 lbs) whilst the Olympus VR-320 has measurements of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).
Contrast the Leica V-Lux 40 and Olympus VR-320 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you select at that time. Underneath is a front view sizing comparison of the V-Lux 40 against the VR-320.

Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the V-Lux 40 and VR-320 is 92 and 94 respectively.
Leica V-Lux 40 vs Olympus VR-320 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it can be tough to picture the contrast in sensor sizing just by looking through a spec sheet. The visual underneath might offer you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the V-Lux 40 and VR-320.
Clearly, each of the cameras have the same sensor dimensions and the same exact MP therefore you can expect comparable quality of pictures although you should always consider the age of the cameras into account. The more recent V-Lux 40 provides a benefit when it comes to sensor tech.
Leica V-Lux 40 vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Leica V-Lux 40 vs Olympus VR-320 Specifications
| Leica V-Lux 40 | Olympus VR-320 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Leica | Olympus |
| Model | Leica V-Lux 40 | Olympus VR-320 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2012-05-10 | 2011-07-19 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | - | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
| Full resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Number of focus points | 23 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-480mm (20.0x) | 24-300mm (12.5x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.3-6.4 | f/3.0-5.9 |
| Macro focus distance | 3cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 461 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Screen technology | - | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 15s | 4s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 10.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 6.40 m | 4.70 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (220 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, AVCHD | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 210 grams (0.46 lb) | 158 grams (0.35 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 105 x 59 x 28mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 210 photos | - |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | - | LI-42B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | SD/SDHC |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Price at launch | $699 | $179 |