Leica V-Lux 40 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS
92 Imaging
37 Features
48 Overall
41
85 Imaging
36 Features
67 Overall
48
Leica V-Lux 40 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-480mm (F3.3-6.4) lens
- 210g - 105 x 59 x 28mm
- Revealed May 2012
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Released December 2012
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Leica V-Lux 40 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Overview
Let's take a deeper look at the Leica V-Lux 40 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Leica and Olympus. The resolution of the V-Lux 40 (14MP) and the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) is fairly close but the V-Lux 40 (1/2.3") and XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") enjoy totally different sensor dimensions.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe V-Lux 40 was announced 7 months prior to the XZ-2 iHS which means that they are both of a similar age. Both of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving through a in depth comparison, below is a concise introduction of how the V-Lux 40 scores vs the XZ-2 iHS with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Leica V-Lux 40 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Leica V-Lux 40 & Olympus XZ-2 iHS. The whole galleries are available at Leica V-Lux 40 Gallery & Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Leica V-Lux 40 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
| V-Lux 40 | XZ-2 iHS |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Leica V-Lux 40
| XZ-2 iHS | V-Lux 40 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | December 2012 | May 2012 | More recent by 7 months | |
| Manually focus | Dial precise focus | |||
| Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
| Display resolution | 920k | 461k | Clearer display (+459k dot) |
Common features in the Leica V-Lux 40 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS
| V-Lux 40 | XZ-2 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent display sizing | |
| Selfie screen | No selfie screen | |||
| Touch display | Easily navigate |
Leica V-Lux 40 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to lug around your camera frequently, you need to factor its weight and measurements. The Leica V-Lux 40 features physical dimensions of 105mm x 59mm x 28mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 210 grams (0.46 lbs) and the Olympus XZ-2 iHS has proportions of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") along with a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs).
Compare the Leica V-Lux 40 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are working with at that moment. Below is the front view measurements comparison of the V-Lux 40 and the XZ-2 iHS.

Using size and weight, the portability score of the V-Lux 40 and XZ-2 iHS is 92 and 85 respectively.
Leica V-Lux 40 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Sensor Comparison
Often, it is difficult to envision the difference in sensor measurements simply by researching technical specs. The photograph underneath may give you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the V-Lux 40 and XZ-2 iHS.
As you can tell, both of the cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The V-Lux 40 using its smaller sensor will make shooting shallow DOF trickier and the Leica V-Lux 40 will result in greater detail with its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop images far more aggressively. The older V-Lux 40 will be disadvantaged in sensor tech.
Leica V-Lux 40 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Leica V-Lux 40 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Specifications
| Leica V-Lux 40 | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Leica | Olympus |
| Model | Leica V-Lux 40 | Olympus XZ-2 iHS |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2012-05-10 | 2012-12-18 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
| Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 41.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 12800 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Number of focus points | 23 | 35 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-480mm (20.0x) | 28-112mm (4.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.3-6.4 | f/1.8-2.5 |
| Macro focus distance | 3cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.9 | 4.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Display diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 461k dot | 920k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Electronic (optional) |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 15 secs | 60 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 10.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 6.40 m | 8.60 m (ISO 800) |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (220 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, AVCHD | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 210 grams (0.46 pounds) | 346 grams (0.76 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 105 x 59 x 28mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | 49 |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 20.4 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 11.3 |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 216 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 210 images | 340 images |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | - | Li-90B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail pricing | $699 | $450 |