Leica V-Lux 40 vs Panasonic FZ200
92 Imaging
37 Features
48 Overall
41
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f06f6/f06f6c9e15fa0fed6b2180ed4f4f8101d4e0e6ad" alt="Leica V-Lux 40 front Leica V-Lux 40 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/14531/14531b22504a4959f06ffa69a9ec4d9107943879" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200 front"
65 Imaging
36 Features
64 Overall
47
Leica V-Lux 40 vs Panasonic FZ200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-480mm (F3.3-6.4) lens
- 210g - 105 x 59 x 28mm
- Introduced May 2012
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Increase to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-600mm (F2.8) lens
- 588g - 125 x 87 x 110mm
- Introduced July 2012
- Replaced the Panasonic FZ100
- Later Model is Panasonic FZ300
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Leica V-Lux 40 vs Panasonic FZ200 Overview
Below is a thorough review of the Leica V-Lux 40 vs Panasonic FZ200, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by brands Leica and Panasonic. The image resolution of the V-Lux 40 (14MP) and the FZ200 (12MP) is pretty similar and both cameras boast the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
The V-Lux 40 was announced 2 months earlier than the FZ200 and they are both of a similar age. Both the cameras have different body design with the Leica V-Lux 40 being a Compact camera and the Panasonic FZ200 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before diving into a thorough comparison, here is a brief summary of how the V-Lux 40 scores vs the FZ200 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Leica V-Lux 40 vs Panasonic FZ200 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Leica V-Lux 40 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200. The whole galleries are viewable at Leica V-Lux 40 Gallery & Panasonic FZ200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Leica V-Lux 40 over the Panasonic FZ200
V-Lux 40 | FZ200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 461k | ![]() | 460k | Crisper screen (+1k dot) |
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FZ200 over the Leica V-Lux 40
FZ200 | V-Lux 40 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Very accurate focus | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies |
Common features in the Leica V-Lux 40 and Panasonic FZ200
V-Lux 40 | FZ200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | May 2012 | ![]() | July 2012 | Similar age |
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal screen sizing |
Leica V-Lux 40 vs Panasonic FZ200 Physical Comparison
If you're intending to lug around your camera, you will have to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Leica V-Lux 40 enjoys exterior measurements of 105mm x 59mm x 28mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 210 grams (0.46 lbs) while the Panasonic FZ200 has dimensions of 125mm x 87mm x 110mm (4.9" x 3.4" x 4.3") accompanied by a weight of 588 grams (1.30 lbs).
Take a look at the Leica V-Lux 40 vs Panasonic FZ200 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are using at that moment. Underneath is a front view over all size comparison of the V-Lux 40 compared to the FZ200.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/65017/650173628196ca511dfa45e1abaae6c9e118a64d" alt="Leica V-Lux 40 vs Panasonic FZ200 size comparison Leica V-Lux 40 vs Panasonic FZ200 size comparison"
Using size and weight, the portability score of the V-Lux 40 and FZ200 is 92 and 65 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f29cd/f29cde3d2f14909a59a532068420ddab7b259782" alt="Leica V-Lux 40 vs Panasonic FZ200 top view buttons comparison Leica V-Lux 40 vs Panasonic FZ200 top view buttons comparison"
Leica V-Lux 40 vs Panasonic FZ200 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is hard to visualise the gap between sensor measurements merely by reading specifications. The photograph here should give you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the V-Lux 40 and FZ200.
Plainly, the 2 cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same resolution. You can expect the Leica V-Lux 40 to offer you more detail with its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop pictures more aggressively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/15821/1582111ad7f58330179d356720d92f4104c1c45b" alt="Leica V-Lux 40 vs Panasonic FZ200 sensor size comparison Leica V-Lux 40 vs Panasonic FZ200 sensor size comparison"
Leica V-Lux 40 vs Panasonic FZ200 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ab935/ab935ab3caef814e223be6f5bef3748661fbd242" alt="Leica V-Lux 40 vs Panasonic FZ200 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Leica V-Lux 40 vs Panasonic FZ200 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Leica V-Lux 40 vs Panasonic FZ200 Specifications
Leica V-Lux 40 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Leica | Panasonic |
Model | Leica V-Lux 40 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200 |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2012-05-10 | 2012-07-18 |
Physical type | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | Venus Engine VII FHD |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4000 x 3000 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Maximum boosted ISO | - | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 23 | 23 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-480mm (20.0x) | 25-600mm (24.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.3-6.4 | f/2.8 |
Macro focus range | 3cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 461 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Display tech | - | Free-Angle TFT Screen LCD Display |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 1,312 thousand dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 15 seconds | 60 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 10.0 frames/s | 12.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 6.40 m | 13.50 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | - | 1/4000 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (220 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60, 50, 30, 25 fps), 1280 x 720p (60, 50, 30, 25 fps), 640 x 480 (240, 120, 30, 25 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, AVCHD | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 210 gr (0.46 lb) | 588 gr (1.30 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 105 x 59 x 28mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 125 x 87 x 110mm (4.9" x 3.4" x 4.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 37 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 19.1 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 10.8 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 114 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 210 images | 540 images |
Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Cost at launch | $699 | $499 |