Leica V-Lux 40 vs Samsung WB800F
92 Imaging
38 Features
48 Overall
42
92 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
Leica V-Lux 40 vs Samsung WB800F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-480mm (F3.3-6.4) lens
- 210g - 105 x 59 x 28mm
- Introduced May 2012
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 218g - 111 x 65 x 22mm
- Revealed January 2013
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Leica V-Lux 40 vs Samsung WB800F Overview
Lets take a deeper look at the Leica V-Lux 40 vs Samsung WB800F, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by manufacturers Leica and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the V-Lux 40 (14MP) and the WB800F (16MP) is relatively similar and they possess the exact same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe V-Lux 40 was released 8 months prior to the WB800F and they are of a similar age. The two cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting in to a detailed comparison, below is a quick synopsis of how the V-Lux 40 matches up versus the WB800F with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Leica V-Lux 40 vs Samsung WB800F Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Leica V-Lux 40 & Samsung WB800F. The complete galleries are provided at Leica V-Lux 40 Gallery & Samsung WB800F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Leica V-Lux 40 over the Samsung WB800F
| V-Lux 40 | WB800F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen resolution | 461k |  | 460k | Sharper screen (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB800F over the Leica V-Lux 40
| WB800F | V-Lux 40 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2013 |  | May 2012 | Newer by 8 months |
| Manual focus |  | Very exact focusing |
Common features in the Leica V-Lux 40 and Samsung WB800F
| V-Lux 40 | WB800F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical screen measurement |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Leica V-Lux 40 vs Samsung WB800F Physical Comparison
When you are planning to travel with your camera frequently, you're going to have to take into account its weight and measurements. The Leica V-Lux 40 comes with outer measurements of 105mm x 59mm x 28mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 210 grams (0.46 lbs) while the Samsung WB800F has proportions of 111mm x 65mm x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs).
Analyze the Leica V-Lux 40 vs Samsung WB800F in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you select at that time. Here is the front view dimension comparison of the V-Lux 40 against the WB800F.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the V-Lux 40 and WB800F is 92 and 92 respectively.
Leica V-Lux 40 vs Samsung WB800F Sensor Comparison
Quite often, its difficult to visualize the gap between sensor dimensions only by going over technical specs. The image underneath will offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the V-Lux 40 and WB800F.
As you have seen, both the cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements albeit different megapixels. You can count on the Samsung WB800F to offer you greater detail as a result of its extra 2MP. Higher resolution can also help you crop pictures somewhat more aggressively. The more aged V-Lux 40 is going to be behind in sensor innovation.
Leica V-Lux 40 vs Samsung WB800F Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Leica V-Lux 40 vs Samsung WB800F Specifications
| Leica V-Lux 40 | Samsung WB800F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Leica | Samsung |
| Model | Leica V-Lux 40 | Samsung WB800F |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2012-05-10 | 2013-01-07 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 16MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Peak resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | 23 | - |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-480mm (20.0x) | 23-483mm (21.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.3-6.4 | f/2.8-5.9 |
| Macro focus distance | 3cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 461 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Display technology | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 15 secs | 16 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 10.0 frames per second | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 6.40 m | - |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro | - |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (220 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, AVCHD | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 210g (0.46 lbs) | 218g (0.48 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 105 x 59 x 28mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 111 x 65 x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 210 pictures | - |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Retail pricing | $699 | $300 |