Leica X-U vs Sigma DP2 Quattro
64 Imaging
59 Features
52 Overall
56
70 Imaging
63 Features
38 Overall
53
Leica X-U vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 12500
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 35mm (F1.7-16.0) lens
- 635g - 140 x 79 x 88mm
- Launched January 2016
- Additionally referred to as Typ 113
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- No Video
- 45mm (F2.8) lens
- 395g - 161 x 67 x 82mm
- Announced February 2014
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Leica X-U vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Overview
On this page, we will be matching up the Leica X-U and Sigma DP2 Quattro, both Large Sensor Compact digital cameras by manufacturers Leica and Sigma. The resolution of the X-U (16MP) and the DP2 Quattro (20MP) is relatively well matched and both cameras posses the same sensor dimensions (APS-C).
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe X-U was introduced 24 months later than the DP2 Quattro which makes them a generation apart from each other. Both cameras have the same body design (Large Sensor Compact).
Before going into a thorough comparison, here is a brief synopsis of how the X-U scores vs the DP2 Quattro in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Leica X-U vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Leica X-U and Sigma DP2 Quattro. The whole galleries are provided at Leica X-U Gallery and Sigma DP2 Quattro Gallery.
Reasons to pick Leica X-U over the Sigma DP2 Quattro
| X-U | DP2 Quattro | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2016 |  | February 2014 | More recent by 24 months |
| Screen type | Fully Articulated |  | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
Reasons to pick Sigma DP2 Quattro over the Leica X-U
| DP2 Quattro | X-U |
|---|
Common features in the Leica X-U and Sigma DP2 Quattro
| X-U | DP2 Quattro | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Dial precise focus | ||
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal screen sizing |
| Screen resolution | 920k |  | 920k | Identical screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither provides Touch screen |
Leica X-U vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to lug around your camera regularly, you'll have to factor in its weight and size. The Leica X-U provides exterior dimensions of 140mm x 79mm x 88mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 3.5") and a weight of 635 grams (1.40 lbs) while the Sigma DP2 Quattro has specifications of 161mm x 67mm x 82mm (6.3" x 2.6" x 3.2") and a weight of 395 grams (0.87 lbs).
See the Leica X-U and Sigma DP2 Quattro in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are utilizing during that time. Here is a front view scale comparison of the X-U against the DP2 Quattro.
Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the X-U and DP2 Quattro is 64 and 70 respectively.
Leica X-U vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is very hard to imagine the difference between sensor measurements just by reading through specifications. The photograph below may give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the X-U and DP2 Quattro.
Plainly, each of the cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit different MP. You should count on the Sigma DP2 Quattro to give greater detail using its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will let you crop shots more aggressively. The younger X-U provides an edge in sensor tech.
Leica X-U vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Leica X-U vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Specifications
| Leica X-U | Sigma DP2 Quattro | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Leica | Sigma |
| Model | Leica X-U | Sigma DP2 Quattro |
| Otherwise known as | Typ 113 | - |
| Type | Large Sensor Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2016-01-20 | 2014-02-13 |
| Physical type | Large Sensor Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | - | TRUE III engine |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
| Sensor size | APS-C | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 23.6 x 15.7mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
| Sensor surface area | 370.5mm² | 369.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4928 x 3264 | 5424 x 3616 |
| Max native ISO | 12500 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | 11 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 35mm (1x) | 45mm (1x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/1.7-16.0 | f/2.8 |
| Crop factor | 1.5 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 920k dots | 920k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Screen technology | - | TFT color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 30 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 5.0 frames per second | 3.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 2.00 m (at ISO 100) | no built-in flash |
| Flash modes | Automatic, automatic/red eye reduction, on, on/red eye reduction, long-term synchronization/red eye reduction, off | no built-in flash |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p) | - |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
| Video data format | MPEG-4 | - |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 635 grams (1.40 lb) | 395 grams (0.87 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 140 x 79 x 88mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 3.5") | 161 x 67 x 82mm (6.3" x 2.6" x 3.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 450 photographs | - |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | BP-DC8 | BP-51 |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | - |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at launch | $3,495 | $931 |