Nikon 1 AW1 vs Sony NEX-5R
86 Imaging
44 Features
62 Overall
51


89 Imaging
56 Features
76 Overall
64
Nikon 1 AW1 vs Sony NEX-5R Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 160 - 6400
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Nikon 1 Mount
- 356g - 114 x 72 x 37mm
- Announced September 2013
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony E Mount
- 276g - 111 x 59 x 39mm
- Announced August 2012
- Superseded the Sony NEX-5N
- Later Model is Sony NEX-5T

When Rugged Meets Refined: Nikon 1 AW1 vs Sony NEX-5R Camera Showdown
Every photographer knows the delight, frustration, and sometimes sheer bewilderment that comes with choosing the right camera. The market's been flooded with options for years - each boasting megapixels, autofocus points, video specs, and gimmicks that often muddy the waters rather than clarify them. Today, we’re stepping back and looking closely at two intriguing entry-level mirrorless cameras from a bygone era: the indestructible Nikon 1 AW1 and the versatile Sony NEX-5R. Though announced within a year of each other (2012-2013), these cameras adopt wildly different philosophies - one built for adventure, the other for creative flexibility.
Having spent years repeatedly field-testing cameras and scrutinizing image quality beyond the marketing buzzwords, I’m going to walk you through a detailed hands-on comparison. Expect to find solid technical analysis peppered with real-world experience, sprinkled with a dash of charm, and a healthy dose of skepticism. Buckle up, grab your gear, and let’s embark on this comparison journey.
First Impressions & Handling: Size, Ergonomics, and Design Philosophy
Before firing off shots, the tactile experience matters - and it's often overlooked. Weight, grip comfort, button placement, and screen usability significantly affect how a camera feels over long shoots.
Take a peek here revealing both cameras side by side, clutchable in one hand or ready for adventure:
The Nikon 1 AW1 is a chunky little beast, weighing 356 grams with dimensions 114x72x37 mm. Its body screams ruggedness - built to endure harsh conditions including shocks and water immersion (more on that later). The Nikon lacks an electronic viewfinder, relying purely on a 3-inch fixed TFT LCD with 921k-dot resolution. While buddy-proof - and pool-proof - it sacrifices discretion and compactness for durability.
On the other hand, Sony’s NEX-5R is lighter (276 grams), sports a sleeker outline (111x59x39 mm), and exudes a refined minimalism with tilting touchscreen capabilities. The handling is more classic “rangefinder style,” designed with street and travel photography in mind - easy to stash in a pocket, quick to whip out and shoot.
Take a closer look at the control layouts from above:
Sony’s layout edges the Nikon in sophistication: touchscreen sensitivity, a mode dial, a single joystick for focus point selection, and customizable function buttons. The Nikon, while sturdy, feels a tad utilitarian and less ergonomic for intricate settings adjustments during spontaneous shoots.
My takeaway? If you want a camera you can beat up or dunk in water, the AW1 is ready to roll. For everyday carry and intuitive handling - especially if you like touchscreen operation - the NEX-5R wins hands down.
Sensor Size & Image Quality: Does Bigger Mean Better?
Sensor size forms the beating heart of any camera’s image quality prowess. Let’s bring the sensor specs into focus:
- Nikon 1 AW1: 1-inch CMOS sensor (13.2x8.8 mm), 14 MP resolution, DXOmark overall score 51.
- Sony NEX-5R: APS-C CMOS sensor (23.4x15.6 mm), 16 MP resolution, DXOmark overall score 78.
Clearly, Sony's APS-C sensor is significantly larger (~3x sensor area), dramatically impacting dynamic range, noise handling, and color depth. The NEX-5R's higher color depth (23.7 bits vs Nikon’s 20.2) and better dynamic range (13.1 vs 10.9) translate into richer, cleaner images with more room for post-processing - exactly what landscape, portrait, and professional photographers crave.
Speaking of resolution, Sony edges out with 4912x3264 pixels, giving you a slight advantage in detail capture compared to Nikon’s 4608x3072 pixels. The Nikon’s sensor being smaller is partly a concession for its unique rugged design and onboard waterproofing.
Let me stress from personal experience: For landscape and portrait photographers who cherish clean shadows, smooth gradients, and supple skin tones, Sony’s sensor superiority is tangible. The Nikon’s smaller sensor can produce decent images in good lighting, but struggles once shadows deepen or you push ISO above 800.
Displays and User Interface: Viewing Your Shot in Comfort
The LCD is your window to composition, focus, and playback. Here's how the two compare:
The AW1 uses a fixed 3-inch 921k-dot non-touch TFT LCD - solid, viewable, but lacking in angle flexibility or interactive controls. If you’re shooting in awkward positions or bright daylight with reflections, this can frustrate composition.
The Sony NEX-5R shines with a fully tilting 3-inch, 920k-dot touch-sensitive LCD - allowing easy framing from above, waist level, or selfie-friendly angles. The touchscreen integration enhances focus point selection (a rarity at the time) and camera menu navigation, tempting you to shoot creatively.
Sony's menu system, while at times labyrinthine, benefits from frequent firmware updates addressing usability issues. Nikon's interface is straightforward but minimalistic; rugged, yes, but not roomy for indulging in quick touchscreen tweaks.
If you’re shooting street photography or travel where constant repositioning and spit-second changes matter, Sony’s LCD gives a clear ergonomics win.
Autofocus Systems & Performance: Catch Your Subject Every Time?
AF speed and accuracy can make or break decisive moments in wildlife, sports, or candid photography. Both cameras use hybrid autofocus systems combining phase-detection and contrast-detection points - yet their implementations differ.
Aspect | Nikon 1 AW1 | Sony NEX-5R |
---|---|---|
Focus Points | 135 (phase + contrast) | 99 (phase + contrast) |
Phase Detection | Yes | Yes |
Contrast Detection | Yes | Yes |
Continuous AF | Yes | Yes |
Face Detection | Yes | No |
Animal Eye AF | No | No |
The Nikon 1 AW1 sports an impressive 135 AF points - more than you usually see in entry-level models. Its AF system benefits from the EXPEED 3A processor that allows commendable subject tracking at high burst rates (up to 60 fps!). This makes it quite formidable in action photography under bright conditions.
However, the Sony NEX-5R, with fewer AF points but excellent hybrid AF algorithms, still produces fast and reliable focusing with decent tracking. It also gives you touch-to-focus on the LCD, facilitating quicker focus acquisition in street and portraiture, albeit without face detection.
In my outdoor tests photographing birds and fast-moving subjects, the Nikon’s tracking shone thanks to that higher frame rate and focus density. The NEX-5R, while slower at burst firing (10 fps), balanced this with better low-light autofocus precision due to the larger sensor gathering more light.
Build Quality and Environmental Durability: Adventure Ready or Delicate Jewel?
Let’s talk toughness because it’s perhaps the starkest practical difference between these two. Nikon boldly pitched the 1 AW1 as the first waterproof, shockproof, freezeproof mirrorless camera. Tested to survive immersion up to 15 meters and falls from about 2 meters, it feels like a tank in your palm.
The NEX-5R, meanwhile, is a typical mirrorless body without environmental sealing - vulnerable to dust, water, and cold. Not a complaint per se, but something to consider if you plan to shoot in extreme environments.
Nikon’s rugged credentials make it an ideal companion for underwater photographers, mountaineers, or anyone wanting to risk their gear in the wild. Trust me, I wouldn’t dare dip my NEX-5R without a bulky waterproof housing.
Lens Ecosystem and Mounts: Which Has More Creative Options?
A camera is only as good as the lenses you can pair it with.
The Nikon 1 AW1 uses the Nikon 1 mount, which supports 13 dedicated lenses. It’s a smaller lens mount tailored for their 1-inch sensor system, leading to fairly compact optics. However, the selection and quality variety are limited compared to larger sensor systems.
Sony’s E-mount, however, is a connectivity dream - boasting an extensive lineup of over 121 lenses from Sony itself, third-party manufacturers like Sigma, Tamron, and Zeiss, spanning ultra wide-angle to telephoto prime and zoom.
That means, if lens versatility and budget flexibility matter, Sony’s platform blows Nikon’s 1 AW1 out of the water. You get access to fast primes with outstanding bokeh for portraits, macro lenses for close-up wonders, and high-quality telephotos for wildlife. The Nikon 1 mount remains a niche ecosystem focused on portability and ruggedness.
Battery Life and Storage Options
Here’s a few practical nuggets from my hands-on sessions.
The Nikon 1 AW1 uses the EN-EL20 battery, rated roughly for 220 shots per charge. Not bad, but you’d best pack spares for longer outings, especially with the high-speed burst draws.
Sony’s NEX-5R with its NP-FW50 battery delivers around 330 shots per charge - more forgiving for day-long street or travel photography.
Both cameras rely on a single SD card slot for storage, though the NEX’s compatibility with Memory Stick cards offers a tad more flexibility where Sony accessories are prevalent.
Connectivity and Extras: Wireless and GPS Showdown
Though both cameras date back nearly a decade, connectivity is surprisingly uneven.
- Nikon 1 AW1 includes built-in GPS, great for location-tagging your adventure shots straight out of the camera.
- Sony NEX-5R offers built-in Wi-Fi (absent in Nikon), enabling remote shooting and easy image transfers - very handy for social sharers and instant backup.
No Bluetooth or NFC on either, no microphone ports for kayfabe filmmakers, and only a basic USB 2.0 connection capped out the list of physical interfaces.
Practical Application Review Across Genres
Now that we’ve tackled the technical nuts and bolts, how do these cameras fare in everyday, real-world use? I put both through their paces across popular photography types:
Portrait Photography
The Sony’s larger APS-C sensor and broader lens ecosystem let you achieve creamy bokeh separation and beautiful true-to-life skin tones. Although Nikon offers face detection, the image quality suffers slightly due to its smaller sensor's color depth and noise at higher ISOs.
Landscape Photography
Sony again takes the crown with superior dynamic range and resolution, preserving shadow nuances and highlight details vital for immersive landscapes. Nikon’s 1" sensor system struggles in high contrast scenarios, making it less desirable for landscapes where tonality matters most.
Wildlife and Sports Photography
Nikon 1 AW1’s 60 fps continuous shooting and extensive focus points make it a surprisingly capable choice for capturing fast, fleeting moments underwater or on rocky trails. The Sony’s slower 10 fps limit hampers high-action bursts but retains decent autofocus tracking when paired with telephoto lenses.
Street Photography
Here, Sony’s stealthier design, lighter body, and tilting touchscreen provide an edge - discrete shooting with rapid settings access. The Nikon’s rugged bulk and fixed screen can slow down rapid-fire candid capture and draw undue attention.
Macro Photography
The Sony’s wider lens choices and larger sensor lend themselves well to macro shooters craving corner-to-corner sharpness. The Nikon’s niche lenses limit possibilities here.
Night and Astrophotography
Sony shines with a max ISO native of 25600 and better low-light capabilities (DXO low light ISO score 910 vs Nikon’s 428). Nikon’s limitations at high ISO and smaller sensor size show their age here.
Video Capabilities
Both max out at 1080p HD recording, with Nikon offering high-frame-rate modes (400 fps slow motion), while Sony provides 1080p 60 fps AVCHD – more suited to traditional video capture. Neither offers microphone inputs or 4K video - unsurprising for cameras from their generation.
Travel Photography
Sony’s portability, better battery life, and versatile lens mount make it an excellent all-around travel companion. The Nikon appeals more to adventure travelers risking submersion or drops but sacrifices versatility.
Professional Work
While neither truly meets the high-end professional mark, Sony’s RAW support, improved sensor, and bigger lens ecosystem have edged it into the realm of semi-pro use. Nikon’s ruggedness targets specialized niche markets rather than studio demands.
Summarizing Performance and Value: An Objective Scorecard
Numbers aren’t everything, but they help paint the big picture:
As you can see, the Sony NEX-5R outperforms in all rounded categories - sensor, ergonomics, autofocus, and value. The Nikon 1 AW1 maintains an honorable niche score for rugged durability and burst shooting.
For clarity, here’s the genre-based analysis:
Wrapping It Up: Which Camera Should You Choose?
Like choosing between a rugged off-road SUV and a sleek city sedan, Nikon 1 AW1 and Sony NEX-5R cater to distinct photographers.
-
Choose the Nikon 1 AW1 if:
- You prioritize survival in extreme conditions (waterproof, shockproof).
- Your photography involves active outdoor sports, underwater exploration, or environments where protective housing is inconvenient.
- Burst shooting speed and rugged body come before top-tier image quality.
-
Choose the Sony NEX-5R if:
- You want a more portable, versatile mirrorless system with superior image quality.
- You shoot portraits, landscapes, street, or travel photography demanding better color, dynamic range, and higher ISO performance.
- You value touchscreen operation, tilting LCD, and access to a vast lens ecosystem.
Final Thoughts: Legacy and Lessons
The Nikon 1 AW1 was a bold experiment ahead of its time - a rugged mirrorless built for adventure seekers. Sony’s NEX-5R set a standard for compact APS-C mirrorless cameras that influenced many successors.
Both models have limitations by today’s standards, but understanding their design philosophy and real-world strengths helps us appreciate how manufacturers tailor cameras to specific photographic lifestyles.
So, have I settled your curiosity or just opened the door to new questions? That’s photography for you - a constant journey of equipment, creativity, and compromise.
Happy shooting, whatever route you take!
Sample Images: The Proof is in the Pixels
To really appreciate these differences, here are some sample images showcasing color rendition, detail, and bokeh from both cameras in various scenarios:
In summary: If your photography style leans heavily towards rugged outdoor adventure with bursts of high-speed action, Nikon 1 AW1 may still have a place in your gear bag. If image quality, creative flexibility, and ergonomic refinement top your priority list, Sony NEX-5R remains a surprisingly capable entry mirrorless system worth considering - even years on.
Thanks for reading this full-throttle, no-fluff comparison! Drop any questions, and stay curious.
Appendix: Quick Spec Highlights at a Glance
Feature | Nikon 1 AW1 | Sony NEX-5R |
---|---|---|
Announced | Sep 2013 | Aug 2012 |
Sensor | 1" CMOS, 14 MP | APS-C CMOS, 16 MP |
Max ISO | 6400 | 25600 |
Burst Rate | 60 fps | 10 fps |
AF Points | 135 | 99 |
Built-in Flash | Yes | No (external supported) |
LCD Screen | Fixed 3" TFT, no touch | 3" Tilt TFT, touchscreen |
Viewfinder | None | Optional EVF |
Waterproof | Yes (15m) | No |
Battery Life | 220 shots | 330 shots |
Price (At Launch) | Nominal/low cost | Around $750 |
Thanks for your time. Until next camera showdown!
Nikon 1 AW1 vs Sony NEX-5R Specifications
Nikon 1 AW1 | Sony Alpha NEX-5R | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Nikon | Sony |
Model type | Nikon 1 AW1 | Sony Alpha NEX-5R |
Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Announced | 2013-09-19 | 2012-08-29 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | EXPEED 3A | Bionz |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 13.2 x 8.8mm | 23.4 x 15.6mm |
Sensor area | 116.2mm² | 365.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4608 x 3072 | 4912 x 3264 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 25600 |
Min native ISO | 160 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Total focus points | 135 | 99 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Nikon 1 | Sony E |
Number of lenses | 13 | 121 |
Focal length multiplier | 2.7 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 921 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Display tech | TFT LCD | Tilt Up 180� Down 50� TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 30 secs | 30 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 60.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.00 m (at ISO 100) | no built-in flash |
Flash modes | Fill flash, fill w/slow sync, rear curtain sync, rear w/slow sync, redeye reduction, redeye w/slow sync, off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | 1/60 secs | 1/160 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60i, 30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 640 x 240 (400 fps), 320 x 120 (1200 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | AVCHD |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Optional | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 356g (0.78 pounds) | 276g (0.61 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 114 x 72 x 37mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.5") | 111 x 59 x 39mm (4.4" x 2.3" x 1.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 51 | 78 |
DXO Color Depth rating | 20.2 | 23.7 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.9 | 13.1 |
DXO Low light rating | 428 | 910 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 220 photos | 330 photos |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | EN-EL20 | NPFW50 |
Self timer | Yes (2, 5, 10 secs) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10sec (3 images)) |
Time lapse recording | With downloadable app | |
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail cost | $0 | $750 |