Olympus E-420 vs Panasonic FH3
77 Imaging
44 Features
36 Overall
40
94 Imaging
36 Features
21 Overall
30
Olympus E-420 vs Panasonic FH3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 426g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
- Announced June 2008
- Superseded the Olympus E-410
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F2.8-6.9) lens
- 165g - 98 x 55 x 24mm
- Released January 2010
- Alternate Name is Lumix DMC-FS11
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus E-420 vs Panasonic FH3 Overview
Lets look more in depth at the Olympus E-420 vs Panasonic FH3, former being a Entry-Level DSLR while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a large gap among the resolutions of the E-420 (10MP) and FH3 (14MP) and the E-420 (Four Thirds) and FH3 (1/2.3") offer different sensor sizes.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe E-420 was unveiled 18 months before the FH3 which makes them a generation apart from one another. Both the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-420 being a Compact SLR camera and the Panasonic FH3 being a Compact camera.
Before we go straight to a complete comparison, here is a short highlight of how the E-420 scores vs the FH3 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photography Glossary Olympus E-420 vs Panasonic FH3 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus E-420 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH3. The full galleries are available at Olympus E-420 Gallery & Panasonic FH3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-420 over the Panasonic FH3
| E-420 | FH3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | Very accurate focus |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FH3 over the Olympus E-420
| FH3 | E-420 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2010 | June 2008 | More recent by 18 months |
Common features in the Olympus E-420 and Panasonic FH3
| E-420 | FH3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Screen dimensions | 2.7" | 2.7" | Equal screen dimensions | |
| Screen resolution | 230k | 230k | Identical screen resolution | |
| Selfie screen | No selfie screen | |||
| Touch screen | No Touch screen |
Olympus E-420 vs Panasonic FH3 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to lug around your camera, you need to consider its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-420 has got outside dimensions of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") having a weight of 426 grams (0.94 lbs) and the Panasonic FH3 has proportions of 98mm x 55mm x 24mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9") having a weight of 165 grams (0.36 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus E-420 vs Panasonic FH3 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are employing at that time. Underneath is a front view dimension comparison of the E-420 compared to the FH3.

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-420 and FH3 is 77 and 94 respectively.
Olympus E-420 vs Panasonic FH3 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it's difficult to picture the contrast in sensor measurements simply by viewing specifications. The graphic underneath might give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the E-420 and FH3.
To sum up, the 2 cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The E-420 using its bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallow DOF simpler and the Panasonic FH3 will result in more detail having an extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop photographs more aggressively. The older E-420 will be disadvantaged in sensor tech.
Olympus E-420 vs Panasonic FH3 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Olympus E-420 vs Panasonic FH3 Specifications
| Olympus E-420 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH3 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Panasonic |
| Model | Olympus E-420 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH3 |
| Otherwise known as | - | Lumix DMC-FS11 |
| Category | Entry-Level DSLR | Small Sensor Compact |
| Announced | 2008-06-23 | 2010-01-06 |
| Body design | Compact SLR | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | TruePic III | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10MP | 14MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Number of focus points | 3 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | - | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Highest aperture | - | f/2.8-6.9 |
| Macro focus distance | - | 5cm |
| Available lenses | 45 | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.7 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
| Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 60s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/1600s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 4.0 frames per sec | 6.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) | 6.80 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Highest flash sync | 1/180s | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
| Video format | - | Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 426 grams (0.94 lbs) | 165 grams (0.36 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") | 98 x 55 x 24mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | 56 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | 21.5 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 10.4 | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | 527 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 500 images | - |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Launch price | $999 | $160 |