Olympus E-420 vs Panasonic FH3
77 Imaging
44 Features
36 Overall
40
94 Imaging
36 Features
21 Overall
30
Olympus E-420 vs Panasonic FH3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 426g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
- Announced June 2008
- Superseded the Olympus E-410
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F2.8-6.9) lens
- 165g - 98 x 55 x 24mm
- Released January 2010
- Alternate Name is Lumix DMC-FS11
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus E-420 vs Panasonic FH3 Overview
Lets look more in depth at the Olympus E-420 vs Panasonic FH3, former being a Entry-Level DSLR while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a large gap among the resolutions of the E-420 (10MP) and FH3 (14MP) and the E-420 (Four Thirds) and FH3 (1/2.3") offer different sensor sizes.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe E-420 was unveiled 18 months before the FH3 which makes them a generation apart from one another. Both the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-420 being a Compact SLR camera and the Panasonic FH3 being a Compact camera.
Before we go straight to a complete comparison, here is a short highlight of how the E-420 scores vs the FH3 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus E-420 vs Panasonic FH3 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus E-420 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH3. The full galleries are available at Olympus E-420 Gallery & Panasonic FH3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-420 over the Panasonic FH3
| E-420 | FH3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | Very accurate focus |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FH3 over the Olympus E-420
| FH3 | E-420 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2010 | June 2008 | More recent by 18 months |
Common features in the Olympus E-420 and Panasonic FH3
| E-420 | FH3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Screen dimensions | 2.7" | 2.7" | Equal screen dimensions | |
| Screen resolution | 230k | 230k | Identical screen resolution | |
| Selfie screen | No selfie screen | |||
| Touch screen | No Touch screen |
Olympus E-420 vs Panasonic FH3 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to lug around your camera, you need to consider its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-420 has got outside dimensions of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") having a weight of 426 grams (0.94 lbs) and the Panasonic FH3 has proportions of 98mm x 55mm x 24mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9") having a weight of 165 grams (0.36 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus E-420 vs Panasonic FH3 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are employing at that time. Underneath is a front view dimension comparison of the E-420 compared to the FH3.

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-420 and FH3 is 77 and 94 respectively.
Olympus E-420 vs Panasonic FH3 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it's difficult to picture the contrast in sensor measurements simply by viewing specifications. The graphic underneath might give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the E-420 and FH3.
To sum up, the 2 cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The E-420 using its bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallow DOF simpler and the Panasonic FH3 will result in more detail having an extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop photographs more aggressively. The older E-420 will be disadvantaged in sensor tech.
Olympus E-420 vs Panasonic FH3 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Olympus E-420 vs Panasonic FH3 Specifications
| Olympus E-420 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH3 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Panasonic |
| Model | Olympus E-420 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH3 |
| Otherwise known as | - | Lumix DMC-FS11 |
| Category | Entry-Level DSLR | Small Sensor Compact |
| Announced | 2008-06-23 | 2010-01-06 |
| Body design | Compact SLR | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | TruePic III | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10MP | 14MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Number of focus points | 3 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | - | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Highest aperture | - | f/2.8-6.9 |
| Macro focus distance | - | 5cm |
| Available lenses | 45 | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.7 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
| Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 60s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/1600s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 4.0 frames per sec | 6.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) | 6.80 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Highest flash sync | 1/180s | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
| Video format | - | Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 426 grams (0.94 lbs) | 165 grams (0.36 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") | 98 x 55 x 24mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | 56 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | 21.5 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 10.4 | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | 527 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 500 images | - |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Launch price | $999 | $160 |