Nikon A1000 vs Olympus Tough-3000
86 Imaging
42 Features
64 Overall
50
94 Imaging
34 Features
26 Overall
30
Nikon A1000 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-840mm (F3.4-6.9) lens
- 330g - 114 x 72 x 41mm
- Revealed January 2019
- Succeeded the Nikon A900
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 159g - 96 x 65 x 23mm
- Introduced January 2010
- Also referred to as mju Tough 3000
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Nikon A1000 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Overview
The following is a extended overview of the Nikon A1000 and Olympus Tough-3000, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Waterproof by rivals Nikon and Olympus. There is a noticeable difference among the sensor resolutions of the A1000 (16MP) and Tough-3000 (12MP) but both cameras offer the identical sensor size (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe A1000 was launched 9 years after the Tough-3000 which is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before diving right into a full comparison, here is a simple highlight of how the A1000 grades vs the Tough-3000 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photography Glossary Nikon A1000 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Nikon Coolpix A1000 & Olympus Stylus Tough-3000. The complete galleries are available at Nikon A1000 Gallery & Olympus Tough-3000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon A1000 over the Olympus Tough-3000
| A1000 | Tough-3000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2019 |  | January 2010 | Newer by 110 months |
| Manually focus |  | More accurate focusing | ||
| Screen type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting screen |
| Screen size | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 921k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+691k dot) |
| Selfie screen |  | Take selfies | ||
| Touch screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus Tough-3000 over the Nikon A1000
| Tough-3000 | A1000 |
|---|
Common features in the Nikon A1000 and Olympus Tough-3000
| A1000 | Tough-3000 |
|---|
Nikon A1000 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Physical Comparison
When you are going to travel with your camera often, you're going to have to factor in its weight and volume. The Nikon A1000 provides physical measurements of 114mm x 72mm x 41mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.6") with a weight of 330 grams (0.73 lbs) and the Olympus Tough-3000 has sizing of 96mm x 65mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") having a weight of 159 grams (0.35 lbs).
Analyze the Nikon A1000 and Olympus Tough-3000 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are utilizing during that time. Following is a front view dimension comparison of the A1000 vs the Tough-3000.
Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the A1000 and Tough-3000 is 86 and 94 respectively.
Nikon A1000 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it can be hard to envision the gap in sensor dimensions merely by checking out specifications. The picture underneath might give you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the A1000 and Tough-3000.
To sum up, both of those cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit not the same MP. You can expect the Nikon A1000 to produce greater detail utilizing its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop pictures a good deal more aggressively. The newer A1000 will have an edge when it comes to sensor technology.
Nikon A1000 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Nikon A1000 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Specifications
| Nikon Coolpix A1000 | Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Nikon | Olympus |
| Model type | Nikon Coolpix A1000 | Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 |
| Also called | - | mju Tough 3000 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Revealed | 2019-01-18 | 2010-01-07 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | - | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 12MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 125 | 64 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-840mm (35.0x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.4-6.9 | f/3.5-5.1 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 2cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Resolution of display | 921 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder resolution | 1,166 thousand dots | - |
| Viewfinder coverage | 98% | - |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 8 secs | 4 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 1.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 6.00 m (with Auto ISO) | 4.00 m |
| Flash options | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p, MP4, H.264, AAC | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | EN-EL12 lithium-ion battery & USB charger | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | No | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 330 gr (0.73 pounds) | 159 gr (0.35 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 114 x 72 x 41mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.6") | 96 x 65 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 250 pictures | - |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Self timer | Yes (3 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card | SD/SDHC, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail cost | $477 | $0 |