Nikon A1000 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS
86 Imaging
42 Features
64 Overall
50
91 Imaging
36 Features
42 Overall
38
Nikon A1000 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-840mm (F3.4-6.9) lens
- 330g - 114 x 72 x 41mm
- Revealed January 2019
- Superseded the Nikon A900
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 111 x 67 x 29mm
- Announced June 2013
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Nikon A1000 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Overview
The following is a detailed analysis of the Nikon A1000 and Olympus TG-2 iHS, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Waterproof by brands Nikon and Olympus. There exists a significant gap among the image resolutions of the A1000 (16MP) and TG-2 iHS (12MP) but both cameras provide the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe A1000 was launched 5 years after the TG-2 iHS which is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before going right into a detailed comparison, here is a quick view of how the A1000 scores against the TG-2 iHS in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Nikon A1000 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Nikon Coolpix A1000 and Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS. The complete galleries are provided at Nikon A1000 Gallery and Olympus TG-2 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon A1000 over the Olympus TG-2 iHS
| A1000 | TG-2 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2019 |  | June 2013 | Newer by 68 months |
| Manually focus |  | Very precise focusing | ||
| Display type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting display |
| Display resolution | 921k |  | 610k | Crisper display (+311k dot) |
| Selfie screen |  | Take selfies | ||
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-2 iHS over the Nikon A1000
| TG-2 iHS | A1000 |
|---|
Common features in the Nikon A1000 and Olympus TG-2 iHS
| A1000 | TG-2 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal display dimensions |
Nikon A1000 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Physical Comparison
If you are intending to travel with your camera, you have to factor in its weight and size. The Nikon A1000 enjoys external dimensions of 114mm x 72mm x 41mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.6") with a weight of 330 grams (0.73 lbs) and the Olympus TG-2 iHS has specifications of 111mm x 67mm x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).
Contrast the Nikon A1000 and Olympus TG-2 iHS in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you select at that time. Underneath is a front view measurements comparison of the A1000 vs the TG-2 iHS.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the A1000 and TG-2 iHS is 86 and 91 respectively.
Nikon A1000 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Sensor Comparison
Quite often, its hard to imagine the contrast in sensor dimensions only by looking through specifications. The picture here will help provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the A1000 and TG-2 iHS.
Plainly, the 2 cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but different megapixels. You should anticipate the Nikon A1000 to render more detail utilizing its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop pics more aggressively. The more recent A1000 provides an edge with regard to sensor tech.
Nikon A1000 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Nikon A1000 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Specifications
| Nikon Coolpix A1000 | Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Nikon | Olympus |
| Model | Nikon Coolpix A1000 | Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Revealed | 2019-01-18 | 2013-06-28 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 125 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-840mm (35.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.4-6.9 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 921k dot | 610k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Screen tech | - | OLED |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder resolution | 1,166k dot | - |
| Viewfinder coverage | 98 percent | - |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 8 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 5.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 6.00 m (with Auto ISO) | - |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p, MP4, H.264, AAC | 1920 x 1080 |
| Maximum video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | EN-EL12 lithium-ion battery & USB charger | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | No | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 330 grams (0.73 lbs) | 230 grams (0.51 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 114 x 72 x 41mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.6") | 111 x 67 x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 250 photos | 350 photos |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | - | Li-90B |
| Self timer | Yes (3 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 and 12 sec, Pet Auto Shutter) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card | - |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at release | $477 | $380 |