Nikon A1000 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS
86 Imaging
42 Features
64 Overall
50
90 Imaging
40 Features
43 Overall
41
Nikon A1000 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-840mm (F3.4-6.9) lens
- 330g - 114 x 72 x 41mm
- Introduced January 2019
- Succeeded the Nikon A900
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 235g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Announced February 2014
- Replacement is Ricoh WG-5 GPS
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Nikon A1000 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Overview
Its time to look much closer at the Nikon A1000 and Ricoh WG-4 GPS, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Waterproof by manufacturers Nikon and Ricoh. The resolution of the A1000 (16MP) and the WG-4 GPS (16MP) is fairly well matched and they use the same exact sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe A1000 was revealed 5 years after the WG-4 GPS which is quite a sizable gap as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go in to a step-by-step comparison, below is a brief summary of how the A1000 matches up versus the WG-4 GPS when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Nikon A1000 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Nikon Coolpix A1000 and Ricoh WG-4 GPS. The full galleries are available at Nikon A1000 Gallery and Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon A1000 over the Ricoh WG-4 GPS
| A1000 | WG-4 GPS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2019 | February 2014 | More modern by 61 months | |
| Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
| Display resolution | 921k | 460k | Sharper display (+461k dot) | |
| Selfie screen | Easy selfies | |||
| Touch display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 GPS over the Nikon A1000
| WG-4 GPS | A1000 |
|---|
Common features in the Nikon A1000 and Ricoh WG-4 GPS
| A1000 | WG-4 GPS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | Dial exact focus | |||
| Display sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent display dimensions |
Nikon A1000 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to carry around your camera often, you have to factor its weight and volume. The Nikon A1000 enjoys outer measurements of 114mm x 72mm x 41mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.6") accompanied by a weight of 330 grams (0.73 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-4 GPS has sizing of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") and a weight of 235 grams (0.52 lbs).
Look at the Nikon A1000 and Ricoh WG-4 GPS in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are working with at the time. Following is the front view dimension comparison of the A1000 vs the WG-4 GPS.

Using size and weight, the portability grade of the A1000 and WG-4 GPS is 86 and 90 respectively.
Nikon A1000 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Sensor Comparison
Usually, it's tough to see the gap between sensor sizes just by reading through technical specs. The pic here will offer you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the A1000 and WG-4 GPS.
As you can tell, the two cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing and the same exact MP and you should expect similar quality of photographs although you should consider the release date of the products into consideration. The more recent A1000 will have an advantage with regard to sensor tech.
Nikon A1000 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Nikon A1000 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Specifications
| Nikon Coolpix A1000 | Ricoh WG-4 GPS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Nikon | Ricoh |
| Model type | Nikon Coolpix A1000 | Ricoh WG-4 GPS |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Introduced | 2019-01-18 | 2014-02-05 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 125 | 125 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-840mm (35.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.4-6.9 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 921 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen technology | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder resolution | 1,166 thousand dots | - |
| Viewfinder coverage | 98% | - |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 8 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | - | 2.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 6.00 m (with Auto ISO) | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash options | - | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p, MP4, H.264, AAC | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) |
| Highest video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | EN-EL12 lithium-ion battery & USB charger | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | No | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 330g (0.73 lbs) | 235g (0.52 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 114 x 72 x 41mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.6") | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 250 images | 240 images |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | - | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (3 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at launch | $477 | $210 |