Nikon A1000 vs Samsung WB210
86 Imaging
42 Features
64 Overall
50
94 Imaging
37 Features
45 Overall
40
Nikon A1000 vs Samsung WB210 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-840mm (F3.4-6.9) lens
- 330g - 114 x 72 x 41mm
- Announced January 2019
- Previous Model is Nikon A900
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600 (Raise to 3200)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F2.9-5.9) lens
- 174g - 101 x 59 x 22mm
- Released July 2011
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Nikon A1000 vs Samsung WB210 Overview
Its time to examine more closely at the Nikon A1000 and Samsung WB210, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by manufacturers Nikon and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the A1000 (16MP) and the WB210 (14MP) is relatively well matched and they come with the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe A1000 was unveiled 7 years after the WB210 which is quite a significant difference as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before going in to a more detailed comparison, below is a brief summary of how the A1000 grades vs the WB210 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Nikon A1000 vs Samsung WB210 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Nikon Coolpix A1000 & Samsung WB210. The full galleries are viewable at Nikon A1000 Gallery & Samsung WB210 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon A1000 over the Samsung WB210
| A1000 | WB210 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2019 |  | July 2011 | More modern by 92 months |
| Screen type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting screen |
| Screen resolution | 921k |  | 1k | Clearer screen (+920k dot) |
| Selfie screen |  | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB210 over the Nikon A1000
| WB210 | A1000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen dimension | 3.5" |  | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
Common features in the Nikon A1000 and Samsung WB210
| A1000 | WB210 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Dial accurate focus | ||
| Touch screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Nikon A1000 vs Samsung WB210 Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to carry around your camera often, you need to think about its weight and measurements. The Nikon A1000 offers physical dimensions of 114mm x 72mm x 41mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.6") accompanied by a weight of 330 grams (0.73 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB210 has proportions of 101mm x 59mm x 22mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 174 grams (0.38 lbs).
Look at the Nikon A1000 and Samsung WB210 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you select at that moment. Below is the front view dimensions comparison of the A1000 versus the WB210.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the A1000 and WB210 is 86 and 94 respectively.
Nikon A1000 vs Samsung WB210 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it can be hard to visualize the gap between sensor sizes simply by checking specifications. The pic here might give you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the A1000 and WB210.
Plainly, the two cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit different resolution. You can count on the Nikon A1000 to give extra detail having an extra 2MP. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop photographs much more aggressively. The more recent A1000 should have an advantage with regard to sensor tech.
Nikon A1000 vs Samsung WB210 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Nikon A1000 vs Samsung WB210 Specifications
| Nikon Coolpix A1000 | Samsung WB210 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Nikon | Samsung |
| Model | Nikon Coolpix A1000 | Samsung WB210 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Announced | 2019-01-18 | 2011-07-19 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
| Maximum boosted ISO | - | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 125 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-840mm (35.0x) | 24-288mm (12.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.4-6.9 | f/2.9-5.9 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3" | 3.5" |
| Resolution of display | 921 thousand dot | 1 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder resolution | 1,166 thousand dot | - |
| Viewfinder coverage | 98% | - |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 8 secs | 8 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 6.00 m (with Auto ISO) | 3.50 m |
| Flash options | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p, MP4, H.264, AAC | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | EN-EL12 lithium-ion battery & USB charger | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | No | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 330 grams (0.73 pounds) | 174 grams (0.38 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 114 x 72 x 41mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.6") | 101 x 59 x 22mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 250 images | - |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Self timer | Yes (3 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card | microSC/SDHC, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Retail cost | $477 | $279 |