Nikon A900 vs Olympus FE-4000
88 Imaging
46 Features
58 Overall
50
95 Imaging
34 Features
17 Overall
27
Nikon A900 vs Olympus FE-4000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-840mm (F3.4-6.9) lens
- 289g - 113 x 67 x 40mm
- Launched February 2016
- New Model is Nikon A1000
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-105mm (F2.6-5.9) lens
- 136g - 95 x 57 x 22mm
- Announced July 2009
- Also Known as X-925
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Nikon A900 vs Olympus FE-4000 Overview
On this page, we are comparing the Nikon A900 and Olympus FE-4000, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Nikon and Olympus. There is a considerable difference among the image resolutions of the A900 (20MP) and FE-4000 (12MP) but both cameras provide the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe A900 was released 6 years later than the FE-4000 and that is a fairly large difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before diving right into a detailed comparison, here is a quick summation of how the A900 matches up against the FE-4000 for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Nikon A900 vs Olympus FE-4000 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Nikon Coolpix A900 & Olympus FE-4000. The complete galleries are available at Nikon A900 Gallery & Olympus FE-4000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon A900 over the Olympus FE-4000
| A900 | FE-4000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | February 2016 |  | July 2009 | Fresher by 81 months |
| Display type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting display |
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 921k |  | 230k | Crisper display (+691k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-4000 over the Nikon A900
| FE-4000 | A900 |
|---|
Common features in the Nikon A900 and Olympus FE-4000
| A900 | FE-4000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Lack of manual focusing | ||
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Lacking Touch display |
Nikon A900 vs Olympus FE-4000 Physical Comparison
If you are planning to carry your camera frequently, you have to factor in its weight and proportions. The Nikon A900 comes with outside measurements of 113mm x 67mm x 40mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.6") accompanied by a weight of 289 grams (0.64 lbs) while the Olympus FE-4000 has measurements of 95mm x 57mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") having a weight of 136 grams (0.30 lbs).
Take a look at the Nikon A900 and Olympus FE-4000 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you choose at that moment. Here is a front view measurement comparison of the A900 against the FE-4000.
Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the A900 and FE-4000 is 88 and 95 respectively.
Nikon A900 vs Olympus FE-4000 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is very tough to see the contrast in sensor sizing only by checking out specifications. The graphic below may provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the A900 and FE-4000.
To sum up, the two cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but not the same MP. You can expect to see the Nikon A900 to produce extra detail as a result of its extra 8 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also help you crop pics more aggressively. The more modern A900 is going to have an advantage with regard to sensor innovation.
Nikon A900 vs Olympus FE-4000 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Nikon A900 vs Olympus FE-4000 Specifications
| Nikon Coolpix A900 | Olympus FE-4000 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Nikon | Olympus |
| Model | Nikon Coolpix A900 | Olympus FE-4000 |
| Also referred to as | - | X-925 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2016-02-23 | 2009-07-22 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | - | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 20 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 |
| Highest resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-840mm (35.0x) | 26-105mm (4.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.4-6.9 | f/2.6-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 3cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Resolution of display | 921 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 8 secs | 4 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 7.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 6.00 m (at Auto ISO) | 4.00 m |
| Flash settings | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 (30p, 25p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p, 25p) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 3840x2160 | 640x480 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 289 grams (0.64 pounds) | 136 grams (0.30 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 113 x 67 x 40mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.6") | 95 x 57 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 pictures | - |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | EN-EL12 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2, 5, 10 secs) | Yes (12 seconds) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at launch | $400 | $130 |