Nikon A900 vs Olympus FE-4000
88 Imaging
45 Features
58 Overall
50
95 Imaging
34 Features
17 Overall
27
Nikon A900 vs Olympus FE-4000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-840mm (F3.4-6.9) lens
- 289g - 113 x 67 x 40mm
- Launched February 2016
- New Model is Nikon A1000
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-105mm (F2.6-5.9) lens
- 136g - 95 x 57 x 22mm
- Announced July 2009
- Also Known as X-925
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Nikon A900 vs Olympus FE-4000 Overview
On this page, we are comparing the Nikon A900 and Olympus FE-4000, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Nikon and Olympus. There is a considerable difference among the image resolutions of the A900 (20MP) and FE-4000 (12MP) but both cameras provide the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe A900 was released 6 years later than the FE-4000 and that is a fairly large difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before diving right into a detailed comparison, here is a quick summation of how the A900 matches up against the FE-4000 for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Photography Glossary Nikon A900 vs Olympus FE-4000 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Nikon Coolpix A900 & Olympus FE-4000. The complete galleries are available at Nikon A900 Gallery & Olympus FE-4000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon A900 over the Olympus FE-4000
| A900 | FE-4000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | February 2016 | July 2009 | Fresher by 81 months | |
| Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
| Display dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
| Display resolution | 921k | 230k | Crisper display (+691k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-4000 over the Nikon A900
| FE-4000 | A900 |
|---|
Common features in the Nikon A900 and Olympus FE-4000
| A900 | FE-4000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | Lack of manual focusing | |||
| Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen | |||
| Touch display | Lacking Touch display |
Nikon A900 vs Olympus FE-4000 Physical Comparison
If you are planning to carry your camera frequently, you have to factor in its weight and proportions. The Nikon A900 comes with outside measurements of 113mm x 67mm x 40mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.6") accompanied by a weight of 289 grams (0.64 lbs) while the Olympus FE-4000 has measurements of 95mm x 57mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") having a weight of 136 grams (0.30 lbs).
Take a look at the Nikon A900 and Olympus FE-4000 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you choose at that moment. Here is a front view measurement comparison of the A900 against the FE-4000.

Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the A900 and FE-4000 is 88 and 95 respectively.
Nikon A900 vs Olympus FE-4000 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is very tough to see the contrast in sensor sizing only by checking out specifications. The graphic below may provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the A900 and FE-4000.
To sum up, the two cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but not the same MP. You can expect to see the Nikon A900 to produce extra detail as a result of its extra 8 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also help you crop pics more aggressively. The more modern A900 is going to have an advantage with regard to sensor innovation.
Nikon A900 vs Olympus FE-4000 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Nikon A900 vs Olympus FE-4000 Specifications
| Nikon Coolpix A900 | Olympus FE-4000 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Nikon | Olympus |
| Model | Nikon Coolpix A900 | Olympus FE-4000 |
| Also referred to as | - | X-925 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2016-02-23 | 2009-07-22 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | - | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 20 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 |
| Highest resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-840mm (35.0x) | 26-105mm (4.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.4-6.9 | f/2.6-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 3cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Resolution of display | 921 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 8 secs | 4 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 7.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 6.00 m (at Auto ISO) | 4.00 m |
| Flash settings | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 (30p, 25p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p, 25p) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 3840x2160 | 640x480 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 289 grams (0.64 pounds) | 136 grams (0.30 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 113 x 67 x 40mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.6") | 95 x 57 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 pictures | - |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | EN-EL12 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2, 5, 10 secs) | Yes (12 seconds) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at launch | $400 | $130 |