Nikon A900 vs Olympus SP-565UZ
88 Imaging
46 Features
58 Overall
50
72 Imaging
33 Features
32 Overall
32
Nikon A900 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-840mm (F3.4-6.9) lens
- 289g - 113 x 67 x 40mm
- Revealed February 2016
- Renewed by Nikon A1000
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-520mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
- 413g - 116 x 84 x 81mm
- Announced January 2009
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Nikon A900 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Overview
Following is a extensive review of the Nikon A900 vs Olympus SP-565UZ, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by brands Nikon and Olympus. There exists a big gap between the resolutions of the A900 (20MP) and SP-565UZ (10MP) but they enjoy the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe A900 was introduced 7 years after the SP-565UZ which is quite a big gap as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go through a thorough comparison, below is a brief synopsis of how the A900 grades against the SP-565UZ in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Nikon A900 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Nikon Coolpix A900 and Olympus SP-565UZ. The whole galleries are viewable at Nikon A900 Gallery and Olympus SP-565UZ Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon A900 over the Olympus SP-565UZ
| A900 | SP-565UZ | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | February 2016 |  | January 2009 | More modern by 87 months |
| Screen type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting screen |
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
| Screen resolution | 921k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+691k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-565UZ over the Nikon A900
| SP-565UZ | A900 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Dial precise focus |
Common features in the Nikon A900 and Olympus SP-565UZ
| A900 | SP-565UZ | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither contains Touch screen |
Nikon A900 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to carry around your camera frequently, you will want to consider its weight and measurements. The Nikon A900 has got outer measurements of 113mm x 67mm x 40mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.6") accompanied by a weight of 289 grams (0.64 lbs) and the Olympus SP-565UZ has proportions of 116mm x 84mm x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") and a weight of 413 grams (0.91 lbs).
Check out the Nikon A900 vs Olympus SP-565UZ in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you choose at that time. Underneath is the front view physical size comparison of the A900 vs the SP-565UZ.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the A900 and SP-565UZ is 88 and 72 respectively.
Nikon A900 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is hard to imagine the contrast between sensor sizes purely by going over specifications. The picture underneath might give you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the A900 and SP-565UZ.
Plainly, the two cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit different megapixels. You should expect the Nikon A900 to deliver more detail using its extra 10 Megapixels. Higher resolution will help you crop pictures much more aggressively. The younger A900 should have an advantage in sensor tech.
Nikon A900 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Nikon A900 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Specifications
| Nikon Coolpix A900 | Olympus SP-565UZ | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Nikon | Olympus |
| Model | Nikon Coolpix A900 | Olympus SP-565UZ |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2016-02-23 | 2009-01-15 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 20MP | 10MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 64 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 143 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-840mm (35.0x) | 26-520mm (20.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.4-6.9 | f/2.8-4.5 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inches | 2.5 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 921 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 8s | 1s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 7.0fps | 1.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 6.00 m (at Auto ISO) | 6.40 m (ISO 200) |
| Flash options | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 (30p, 25p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p, 25p) | 640 x 480 @ 30 fps/15 fps, 320 x 240 @ 30 fps/15 fps |
| Highest video resolution | 3840x2160 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 289 grams (0.64 lb) | 413 grams (0.91 lb) |
| Dimensions | 113 x 67 x 40mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.6") | 116 x 84 x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | 30 |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 18.7 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 10.1 |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 68 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 shots | - |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | EN-EL12 | 4 x AA |
| Self timer | Yes (2, 5, 10 secs) | Yes (12 or 2 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | xD Picture Card, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch price | $400 | $400 |