Nikon A900 vs Olympus SP-600 UZ
88 Imaging
46 Features
58 Overall
50
69 Imaging
35 Features
27 Overall
31
Nikon A900 vs Olympus SP-600 UZ Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-840mm (F3.4-6.9) lens
- 289g - 113 x 67 x 40mm
- Revealed February 2016
- Renewed by Nikon A1000
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-420mm (F3.5-5.4) lens
- 455g - 110 x 90 x 91mm
- Announced February 2010
- Old Model is Olympus SP-590 UZ
- Updated by Olympus SP-610UZ
Nikon A900 vs Olympus SP-600 UZ Overview
On this page, we will be comparing the Nikon A900 versus Olympus SP-600 UZ, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by brands Nikon and Olympus. There is a significant difference between the sensor resolutions of the A900 (20MP) and SP-600 UZ (12MP) but both cameras posses the same sensor size (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe A900 was brought out 6 years after the SP-600 UZ which is quite a sizable gap as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before going right into a in depth comparison, here is a short summation of how the A900 grades against the SP-600 UZ in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Nikon A900 vs Olympus SP-600 UZ Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Nikon Coolpix A900 and Olympus SP-600 UZ. The entire galleries are viewable at Nikon A900 Gallery and Olympus SP-600 UZ Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon A900 over the Olympus SP-600 UZ
A900 | SP-600 UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | February 2016 | February 2010 | More modern by 74 months | |
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Screen dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 921k | 230k | Clearer screen (+691k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-600 UZ over the Nikon A900
SP-600 UZ | A900 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | More precise focusing |
Common features in the Nikon A900 and Olympus SP-600 UZ
A900 | SP-600 UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Neither offers Touch screen |
Nikon A900 vs Olympus SP-600 UZ Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to carry around your camera, you will have to factor in its weight and volume. The Nikon A900 offers outside measurements of 113mm x 67mm x 40mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.6") with a weight of 289 grams (0.64 lbs) and the Olympus SP-600 UZ has sizing of 110mm x 90mm x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6") and a weight of 455 grams (1.00 lbs).
Check out the Nikon A900 versus Olympus SP-600 UZ in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you select at that time. Below is a front view measurement comparison of the A900 against the SP-600 UZ.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the A900 and SP-600 UZ is 88 and 69 respectively.
Nikon A900 vs Olympus SP-600 UZ Sensor Comparison
Generally, it's tough to envision the contrast between sensor sizes simply by reading technical specs. The image here will provide you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the A900 and SP-600 UZ.
As you can tell, each of the cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same MP. You should expect the Nikon A900 to offer you more detail having its extra 8 Megapixels. Higher resolution will help you crop pictures a bit more aggressively. The younger A900 will have an edge when it comes to sensor technology.
Nikon A900 vs Olympus SP-600 UZ Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Nikon A900 vs Olympus SP-600 UZ Specifications
Nikon Coolpix A900 | Olympus SP-600 UZ | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Nikon | Olympus |
Model | Nikon Coolpix A900 | Olympus SP-600 UZ |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2016-02-23 | 2010-02-02 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | TruePic III |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | - |
Peak resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 3968 x 2976 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 143 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-840mm (35.0x) | 28-420mm (15.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.4-6.9 | f/3.5-5.4 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
Resolution of screen | 921 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 8 secs | 1/2 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 7.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 6.00 m (at Auto ISO) | 3.10 m |
Flash options | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 (30p, 25p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p, 25p) | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 289g (0.64 lb) | 455g (1.00 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 113 x 67 x 40mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.6") | 110 x 90 x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 photos | - |
Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | EN-EL12 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2, 5, 10 secs) | Yes (12 or 2 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch pricing | $400 | $189 |