Nikon A900 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ
88 Imaging
46 Features
58 Overall
50
69 Imaging
36 Features
35 Overall
35
Nikon A900 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-840mm (F3.4-6.9) lens
- 289g - 113 x 67 x 40mm
- Released February 2016
- Newer Model is Nikon A1000
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200 (Increase to 1000)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-840mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
- 455g - 110 x 90 x 91mm
- Launched February 2010
- Updated by Olympus SP-810 UZ
Photography Glossary Nikon A900 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Overview
Below is a thorough comparison of the Nikon A900 and Olympus SP-800 UZ, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by rivals Nikon and Olympus. There is a huge difference between the image resolutions of the A900 (20MP) and SP-800 UZ (14MP) but they use the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe A900 was launched 6 years later than the SP-800 UZ and that is quite a significant gap as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving through a thorough comparison, below is a short highlight of how the A900 matches up against the SP-800 UZ in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Nikon A900 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Nikon Coolpix A900 and Olympus SP-800 UZ. The complete galleries are provided at Nikon A900 Gallery and Olympus SP-800 UZ Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon A900 over the Olympus SP-800 UZ
| A900 | SP-800 UZ | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | February 2016 |  | February 2010 | More recent by 74 months |
| Display type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting display |
| Display resolution | 921k |  | 230k | Crisper display (+691k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-800 UZ over the Nikon A900
| SP-800 UZ | A900 |
|---|
Common features in the Nikon A900 and Olympus SP-800 UZ
| A900 | SP-800 UZ | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | No manual focusing | ||
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent display measurements |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Lack of Touch friendly display |
Nikon A900 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Physical Comparison
When you are going to lug around your camera often, you'll have to factor in its weight and measurements. The Nikon A900 has got exterior dimensions of 113mm x 67mm x 40mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.6") accompanied by a weight of 289 grams (0.64 lbs) and the Olympus SP-800 UZ has proportions of 110mm x 90mm x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6") accompanied by a weight of 455 grams (1.00 lbs).
Look at the Nikon A900 and Olympus SP-800 UZ in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you choose at that time. The following is the front view sizing comparison of the A900 vs the SP-800 UZ.
Using size and weight, the portability grade of the A900 and SP-800 UZ is 88 and 69 respectively.
Nikon A900 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is hard to see the contrast between sensor measurements just by checking a spec sheet. The graphic here may provide you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the A900 and SP-800 UZ.
As you can see, each of the cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing but not the same resolution. You should anticipate the Nikon A900 to resolve more detail utilizing its extra 6MP. Greater resolution can also help you crop images far more aggressively. The more modern A900 is going to have an edge when it comes to sensor tech.
Nikon A900 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Nikon A900 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Specifications
| Nikon Coolpix A900 | Olympus SP-800 UZ | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Nikon | Olympus |
| Model type | Nikon Coolpix A900 | Olympus SP-800 UZ |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2016-02-23 | 2010-02-02 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | - | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 20 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | - |
| Highest resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Highest boosted ISO | - | 1000 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 64 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Total focus points | - | 143 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-840mm (35.0x) | 28-840mm (30.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.4-6.9 | f/2.8-5.6 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 921 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 8 secs | 12 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 7.0fps | 10.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 6.00 m (at Auto ISO) | 3.10 m |
| Flash options | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 (30p, 25p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p, 25p) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 289 grams (0.64 lbs) | 455 grams (1.00 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 113 x 67 x 40mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.6") | 110 x 90 x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 photos | - |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | EN-EL12 | Li-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (2, 5, 10 secs) | Yes (12 or 2 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch cost | $400 | $270 |