Nikon A900 vs Olympus TG-320
88 Imaging
46 Features
58 Overall
50
94 Imaging
37 Features
33 Overall
35
Nikon A900 vs Olympus TG-320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-840mm (F3.4-6.9) lens
- 289g - 113 x 67 x 40mm
- Revealed February 2016
- Successor is Nikon A1000
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
- Introduced January 2012
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Nikon A900 vs Olympus TG-320 Overview
Lets look more closely at the Nikon A900 and Olympus TG-320, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Waterproof by manufacturers Nikon and Olympus. There is a significant difference between the image resolutions of the A900 (20MP) and TG-320 (14MP) but both cameras have the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe A900 was manufactured 4 years later than the TG-320 and that is quite a sizable gap as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before we go straight to a thorough comparison, here is a brief summary of how the A900 matches up versus the TG-320 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Nikon A900 vs Olympus TG-320 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Nikon Coolpix A900 and Olympus TG-320. The entire galleries are provided at Nikon A900 Gallery and Olympus TG-320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon A900 over the Olympus TG-320
| A900 | TG-320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | February 2016 |  | January 2012 | More recent by 51 months |
| Display type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting display |
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 921k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+691k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-320 over the Nikon A900
| TG-320 | A900 |
|---|
Common features in the Nikon A900 and Olympus TG-320
| A900 | TG-320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Lack of manual focusing | ||
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither contains Touch friendly display |
Nikon A900 vs Olympus TG-320 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to lug around your camera regularly, you should factor in its weight and measurements. The Nikon A900 has got outside dimensions of 113mm x 67mm x 40mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.6") with a weight of 289 grams (0.64 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-320 has proportions of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs).
Examine the Nikon A900 and Olympus TG-320 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you choose during that time. Underneath is a front view over all size comparison of the A900 against the TG-320.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the A900 and TG-320 is 88 and 94 respectively.
Nikon A900 vs Olympus TG-320 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it can be hard to visualize the gap between sensor measurements merely by looking at a spec sheet. The graphic underneath might give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the A900 and TG-320.
As you can see, each of the cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but different resolution. You should expect to see the Nikon A900 to give you extra detail due to its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop images more aggressively. The younger A900 should have a benefit in sensor tech.
Nikon A900 vs Olympus TG-320 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Nikon A900 vs Olympus TG-320 Specifications
| Nikon Coolpix A900 | Olympus TG-320 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Nikon | Olympus |
| Model type | Nikon Coolpix A900 | Olympus TG-320 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Revealed | 2016-02-23 | 2012-01-10 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | - | TruePic III+ |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 20 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | - |
| Highest Possible resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-840mm (35.0x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.4-6.9 | f/3.5-5.1 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 3cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Display resolution | 921 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Display tech | - | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 8 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 7.0 frames per second | 1.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 6.00 m (at Auto ISO) | 5.80 m |
| Flash settings | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 (30p, 25p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p, 25p) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 289g (0.64 lb) | 155g (0.34 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 113 x 67 x 40mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.6") | 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 photos | 150 photos |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | EN-EL12 | LI-42B |
| Self timer | Yes (2, 5, 10 secs) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at release | $400 | $0 |