Nikon A900 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS
88 Imaging
45 Features
58 Overall
50
92 Imaging
35 Features
37 Overall
35
Nikon A900 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-840mm (F3.4-6.9) lens
- 289g - 113 x 67 x 40mm
- Revealed February 2016
- Newer Model is Nikon A1000
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 206g - 101 x 65 x 26mm
- Released February 2012
Photography Glossary Nikon A900 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Overview
Its time to look closer at the Nikon A900 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Waterproof by rivals Nikon and Olympus. There exists a huge gap among the image resolutions of the A900 (20MP) and TG-820 iHS (12MP) but both cameras boast the identical sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe A900 was released 4 years after the TG-820 iHS which is a fairly significant gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before getting into a comprehensive comparison, here is a brief summation of how the A900 matches up versus the TG-820 iHS in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Nikon A900 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Nikon Coolpix A900 and Olympus TG-820 iHS. The complete galleries are viewable at Nikon A900 Gallery and Olympus TG-820 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon A900 over the Olympus TG-820 iHS
| A900 | TG-820 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | February 2016 |  | February 2012 | More modern by 50 months |
| Display type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting display |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-820 iHS over the Nikon A900
| TG-820 iHS | A900 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display resolution | 1030k |  | 921k | Clearer display (+109k dot) |
Common features in the Nikon A900 and Olympus TG-820 iHS
| A900 | TG-820 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | No manual focus | ||
| Display size | 3" |  | 3" | Same display measurement |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither comes with Touch friendly display |
Nikon A900 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to carry around your camera often, you will need to think about its weight and volume. The Nikon A900 comes with physical measurements of 113mm x 67mm x 40mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.6") with a weight of 289 grams (0.64 lbs) and the Olympus TG-820 iHS has sizing of 101mm x 65mm x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") along with a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs).
Take a look at the Nikon A900 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you have at that time. Following is a front view overall size comparison of the A900 and the TG-820 iHS.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the A900 and TG-820 iHS is 88 and 92 respectively.
Nikon A900 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Sensor Comparison
Typically, it can be tough to visualize the gap in sensor sizes merely by going through specs. The pic below should provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the A900 and TG-820 iHS.
As you can plainly see, both the cameras feature the identical sensor size but different megapixels. You should expect to see the Nikon A900 to produce more detail as a result of its extra 8MP. Greater resolution can also let you crop images way more aggressively. The younger A900 provides an edge when it comes to sensor tech.
Nikon A900 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Nikon A900 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Specifications
| Nikon Coolpix A900 | Olympus TG-820 iHS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Nikon | Olympus |
| Model | Nikon Coolpix A900 | Olympus TG-820 iHS |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Revealed | 2016-02-23 | 2012-02-08 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | - | TruePic VI |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 20MP | 12MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | - |
| Highest resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-840mm (35.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.4-6.9 | f/3.9-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Display resolution | 921k dot | 1,030k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Display tech | - | HyperCrystal III TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 8 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | 7.0 frames/s | 5.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 6.00 m (at Auto ISO) | 3.50 m |
| Flash options | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 (30p, 25p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p, 25p) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps)1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 289 gr (0.64 lb) | 206 gr (0.45 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 113 x 67 x 40mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.6") | 101 x 65 x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 pictures | 220 pictures |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | EN-EL12 | LI-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (2, 5, 10 secs) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Price at launch | $400 | $500 |