Nikon A900 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS
88 Imaging
46 Features
58 Overall
50
91 Imaging
40 Features
40 Overall
40
Nikon A900 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-840mm (F3.4-6.9) lens
- 289g - 113 x 67 x 40mm
- Introduced February 2016
- Newer Model is Nikon A1000
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 214g - 109 x 67 x 28mm
- Launched January 2013
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Nikon A900 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Overview
Below is a extended analysis of the Nikon A900 and Olympus TG-830 iHS, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Waterproof by rivals Nikon and Olympus. There exists a noticeable gap among the image resolutions of the A900 (20MP) and TG-830 iHS (16MP) but both cameras posses the same sensor size (1/2.3").
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingThe A900 was revealed 3 years later than the TG-830 iHS and that is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before diving into a step-by-step comparison, here is a short synopsis of how the A900 matches up versus the TG-830 iHS when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Nikon A900 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Nikon Coolpix A900 & Olympus TG-830 iHS. The full galleries are provided at Nikon A900 Gallery & Olympus TG-830 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon A900 over the Olympus TG-830 iHS
| A900 | TG-830 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | February 2016 |  | January 2013 | More recent by 39 months |
| Display type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting display |
| Display resolution | 921k |  | 460k | Clearer display (+461k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-830 iHS over the Nikon A900
| TG-830 iHS | A900 |
|---|
Common features in the Nikon A900 and Olympus TG-830 iHS
| A900 | TG-830 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | No manual focusing | ||
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal display size |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither comes with Touch friendly display |
Nikon A900 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to lug around your camera regularly, you will have to take into account its weight and volume. The Nikon A900 comes with outer dimensions of 113mm x 67mm x 40mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.6") with a weight of 289 grams (0.64 lbs) while the Olympus TG-830 iHS has sizing of 109mm x 67mm x 28mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.1") along with a weight of 214 grams (0.47 lbs).
Check out the Nikon A900 and Olympus TG-830 iHS in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are utilising at the time. Below is a front view physical size comparison of the A900 against the TG-830 iHS.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the A900 and TG-830 iHS is 88 and 91 respectively.
Nikon A900 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Sensor Comparison
Typically, it can be difficult to envision the contrast in sensor measurements merely by going through a spec sheet. The graphic below should offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the A900 and TG-830 iHS.
Clearly, each of the cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but not the same MP. You can anticipate the Nikon A900 to show extra detail because of its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will let you crop pics more aggressively. The fresher A900 will have an edge when it comes to sensor technology.
Nikon A900 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixelsVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Nikon A900 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Specifications
| Nikon Coolpix A900 | Olympus TG-830 iHS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Nikon | Olympus |
| Model type | Nikon Coolpix A900 | Olympus TG-830 iHS |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Introduced | 2016-02-23 | 2013-01-08 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 20 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-840mm (35.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.4-6.9 | f/3.9-5.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 921k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 8s | 4s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 7.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 6.00 m (at Auto ISO) | - |
| Flash settings | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 (30p, 25p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p, 25p) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
| Max video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 289 grams (0.64 lb) | 214 grams (0.47 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 113 x 67 x 40mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.6") | 109 x 67 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 photographs | 300 photographs |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | EN-EL12 | LI-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (2, 5, 10 secs) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Retail cost | $400 | $0 |
