Nikon A900 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS
88 Imaging
45 Features
58 Overall
50
91 Imaging
35 Features
40 Overall
37
Nikon A900 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-840mm (F3.4-6.9) lens
- 289g - 113 x 67 x 40mm
- Announced February 2016
- Successor is Nikon A1000
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 112 x 67 x 30mm
- Introduced May 2012
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Nikon A900 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Overview
Its time to look closer at the Nikon A900 and Olympus TG-1 iHS, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Waterproof by manufacturers Nikon and Olympus. There exists a considerable gap among the resolutions of the A900 (20MP) and TG-1 iHS (12MP) but both cameras posses the identical sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe A900 was launched 3 years after the TG-1 iHS which is a fairly large difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before diving right into a in-depth comparison, here is a brief summation of how the A900 scores vs the TG-1 iHS for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Nikon A900 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Nikon Coolpix A900 & Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS. The complete galleries are provided at Nikon A900 Gallery & Olympus TG-1 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon A900 over the Olympus TG-1 iHS
| A900 | TG-1 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | February 2016 | May 2012 | Newer by 47 months | |
| Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
| Display resolution | 921k | 610k | Sharper display (+311k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-1 iHS over the Nikon A900
| TG-1 iHS | A900 |
|---|
Common features in the Nikon A900 and Olympus TG-1 iHS
| A900 | TG-1 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | No manual focus | |||
| Display size | 3" | 3" | Same display measurement | |
| Selfie screen | Neither includes selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly display | Lacking Touch friendly display |
Nikon A900 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to travel with your camera, you will have to factor its weight and proportions. The Nikon A900 features outside dimensions of 113mm x 67mm x 40mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.6") having a weight of 289 grams (0.64 lbs) and the Olympus TG-1 iHS has measurements of 112mm x 67mm x 30mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") having a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).
Contrast the Nikon A900 and Olympus TG-1 iHS in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are utilising at the time. Here is a front view scale comparison of the A900 versus the TG-1 iHS.

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the A900 and TG-1 iHS is 88 and 91 respectively.
Nikon A900 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is tough to visualize the difference in sensor dimensions just by viewing a spec sheet. The picture below will help offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the A900 and TG-1 iHS.
As you can see, the two cameras come with the identical sensor size but different resolution. You can expect to see the Nikon A900 to render greater detail utilizing its extra 8MP. Greater resolution can also let you crop photos a good deal more aggressively. The more modern A900 provides an edge in sensor tech.
Nikon A900 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Nikon A900 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Specifications
| Nikon Coolpix A900 | Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Nikon | Olympus |
| Model type | Nikon Coolpix A900 | Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Announced | 2016-02-23 | 2012-05-08 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | - | TruePic VI |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 20 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-840mm (35.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.4-6.9 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 921 thousand dot | 610 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 8s | 4s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 7.0 frames/s | 3.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 6.00 m (at Auto ISO) | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 (30p, 25p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p, 25p) | 1920 x 1080 |
| Max video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 289g (0.64 lb) | 230g (0.51 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 113 x 67 x 40mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.6") | 112 x 67 x 30mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 pictures | 350 pictures |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | EN-EL12 | LI90B |
| Self timer | Yes (2, 5, 10 secs) | Yes (2 and 12 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | - |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Retail price | $400 | $399 |