Nikon A900 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS
88 Imaging
46 Features
58 Overall
50
91 Imaging
36 Features
42 Overall
38
Nikon A900 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-840mm (F3.4-6.9) lens
- 289g - 113 x 67 x 40mm
- Revealed February 2016
- New Model is Nikon A1000
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 111 x 67 x 29mm
- Revealed June 2013
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Nikon A900 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Overview
Below, we will be evaluating the Nikon A900 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Waterproof by companies Nikon and Olympus. There exists a considerable gap among the sensor resolutions of the A900 (20MP) and TG-2 iHS (12MP) but they enjoy the exact same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe A900 was revealed 2 years later than the TG-2 iHS and that is a fairly large difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving straight into a detailed comparison, below is a brief synopsis of how the A900 scores versus the TG-2 iHS with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Nikon A900 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Nikon Coolpix A900 & Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS. The full galleries are provided at Nikon A900 Gallery & Olympus TG-2 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon A900 over the Olympus TG-2 iHS
| A900 | TG-2 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | February 2016 |  | June 2013 | Fresher by 33 months |
| Screen type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting screen |
| Screen resolution | 921k |  | 610k | Sharper screen (+311k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-2 iHS over the Nikon A900
| TG-2 iHS | A900 |
|---|
Common features in the Nikon A900 and Olympus TG-2 iHS
| A900 | TG-2 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | No manual focusing | ||
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical screen dimensions |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Lacking Touch friendly screen |
Nikon A900 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Physical Comparison
If you are planning to carry your camera regularly, you will want to think about its weight and proportions. The Nikon A900 offers physical measurements of 113mm x 67mm x 40mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.6") and a weight of 289 grams (0.64 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-2 iHS has measurements of 111mm x 67mm x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") having a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).
Examine the Nikon A900 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you choose during that time. The following is the front view physical size comparison of the A900 and the TG-2 iHS.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the A900 and TG-2 iHS is 88 and 91 respectively.
Nikon A900 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is hard to visualize the difference in sensor sizing purely by checking out specs. The photograph here may provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the A900 and TG-2 iHS.
As you can plainly see, both of the cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements albeit different megapixels. You can count on the Nikon A900 to produce more detail because of its extra 8MP. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop pictures somewhat more aggressively. The more recent A900 should have a benefit with regard to sensor technology.
Nikon A900 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixelsSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Nikon A900 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Specifications
| Nikon Coolpix A900 | Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Nikon | Olympus |
| Model type | Nikon Coolpix A900 | Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Revealed | 2016-02-23 | 2013-06-28 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 20MP | 12MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-840mm (35.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.4-6.9 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 921 thousand dot | 610 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Display technology | - | OLED |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 8 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | 7.0fps | 5.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 6.00 m (at Auto ISO) | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 (30p, 25p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p, 25p) | 1920 x 1080 |
| Max video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 289g (0.64 lb) | 230g (0.51 lb) |
| Dimensions | 113 x 67 x 40mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.6") | 111 x 67 x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 shots | 350 shots |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | EN-EL12 | Li-90B |
| Self timer | Yes (2, 5, 10 secs) | Yes (2 and 12 sec, Pet Auto Shutter) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | - |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Retail cost | $400 | $380 |
