Nikon A900 vs Olympus XZ-1
88 Imaging
46 Features
58 Overall
50
88 Imaging
35 Features
51 Overall
41
Nikon A900 vs Olympus XZ-1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-840mm (F3.4-6.9) lens
- 289g - 113 x 67 x 40mm
- Announced February 2016
- Newer Model is Nikon A1000
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.63" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 275g - 111 x 65 x 42mm
- Announced January 2011
Nikon A900 vs Olympus XZ-1 Overview
Lets examine more in depth at the Nikon A900 and Olympus XZ-1, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Nikon and Olympus. There is a sizable difference among the resolutions of the A900 (20MP) and XZ-1 (10MP) and the A900 (1/2.3") and XZ-1 (1/1.63") come with different sensor measurements.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe A900 was revealed 5 years later than the XZ-1 and that is a fairly significant difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving through a in-depth comparison, below is a simple summation of how the A900 grades vs the XZ-1 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Nikon A900 vs Olympus XZ-1 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Nikon Coolpix A900 & Olympus XZ-1. The full galleries are available at Nikon A900 Gallery & Olympus XZ-1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon A900 over the Olympus XZ-1
A900 | XZ-1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | February 2016 | January 2011 | Fresher by 62 months | |
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Display resolution | 921k | 614k | Clearer display (+307k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-1 over the Nikon A900
XZ-1 | A900 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Very accurate focus |
Common features in the Nikon A900 and Olympus XZ-1
A900 | XZ-1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical display measurements | |
Selfie screen | Neither offers selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Neither offers Touch friendly display |
Nikon A900 vs Olympus XZ-1 Physical Comparison
When you are looking to carry your camera frequently, you have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Nikon A900 offers physical dimensions of 113mm x 67mm x 40mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.6") accompanied by a weight of 289 grams (0.64 lbs) whilst the Olympus XZ-1 has dimensions of 111mm x 65mm x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") with a weight of 275 grams (0.61 lbs).
Contrast the Nikon A900 and Olympus XZ-1 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you have chosen at the time. Following is the front view measurements comparison of the A900 and the XZ-1.
Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the A900 and XZ-1 is 88 and 88 respectively.
Nikon A900 vs Olympus XZ-1 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it can be hard to imagine the contrast in sensor sizing merely by looking through specs. The graphic underneath should give you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the A900 and XZ-1.
As you can plainly see, both of those cameras have got different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The A900 with its smaller sensor is going to make shooting bokeh tougher and the Nikon A900 will provide you with greater detail because of its extra 10MP. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop images much more aggressively. The fresher A900 provides an advantage with regard to sensor technology.
Nikon A900 vs Olympus XZ-1 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Nikon A900 vs Olympus XZ-1 Specifications
Nikon Coolpix A900 | Olympus XZ-1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Nikon | Olympus |
Model type | Nikon Coolpix A900 | Olympus XZ-1 |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2016-02-23 | 2011-01-26 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | TruePic V |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.63" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 8.07 x 5.56mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 44.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 3664 x 2752 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Total focus points | - | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-840mm (35.0x) | 28-112mm (4.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.4-6.9 | f/1.8-2.5 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 4.5 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 921 thousand dot | 614 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Display tech | - | OLED |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 8 secs | 60 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 7.0 frames/s | 2.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 6.00 m (at Auto ISO) | 8.60 m (ISO 800) |
Flash modes | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 (30p, 25p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p, 25p) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 289g (0.64 lbs) | 275g (0.61 lbs) |
Dimensions | 113 x 67 x 40mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.6") | 111 x 65 x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | 34 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 18.8 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 10.4 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 117 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 pictures | 320 pictures |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | EN-EL12 | Li-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2, 5, 10 secs) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail price | $400 | $567 |