Nikon A900 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS
88 Imaging
46 Features
58 Overall
50


85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
Nikon A900 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-840mm (F3.4-6.9) lens
- 289g - 113 x 67 x 40mm
- Revealed February 2016
- New Model is Nikon A1000
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Announced December 2012

Nikon A900 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Overview
Here, we will be looking at the Nikon A900 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Nikon and Olympus. There exists a big gap between the sensor resolutions of the A900 (20MP) and XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and the A900 (1/2.3") and XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") offer totally different sensor measurements.

The A900 was revealed 3 years after the XZ-2 iHS which is quite a big gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before getting straight to a step-by-step comparison, here is a quick synopsis of how the A900 scores versus the XZ-2 iHS for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Nikon A900 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Nikon Coolpix A900 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS. The full galleries are provided at Nikon A900 Gallery and Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon A900 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
A900 | XZ-2 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | February 2016 | ![]() | December 2012 | Newer by 39 months |
Screen resolution | 921k | ![]() | 920k | Clearer screen (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Nikon A900
XZ-2 iHS | A900 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Very exact focus | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Nikon A900 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS
A900 | XZ-2 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Tilting | Tilting screen |
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same screen measurements |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither comes with selfie screen |
Nikon A900 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to travel with your camera often, you'll need to consider its weight and dimensions. The Nikon A900 comes with outer dimensions of 113mm x 67mm x 40mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.6") with a weight of 289 grams (0.64 lbs) and the Olympus XZ-2 iHS has dimensions of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") along with a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs).
Compare the Nikon A900 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are utilising at the time. The following is a front view measurement comparison of the A900 vs the XZ-2 iHS.

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the A900 and XZ-2 iHS is 88 and 85 respectively.

Nikon A900 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Sensor Comparison
Typically, it's difficult to visualise the difference between sensor dimensions merely by reviewing specifications. The picture here may give you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the A900 and XZ-2 iHS.
To sum up, the 2 cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The A900 with its tinier sensor will make shooting shallower depth of field harder and the Nikon A900 will deliver more detail because of its extra 8 Megapixels. Higher resolution will enable you to crop photographs way more aggressively. The more recent A900 will have a benefit with regard to sensor innovation.

Nikon A900 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Nikon A900 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Specifications
Nikon Coolpix A900 | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Nikon | Olympus |
Model type | Nikon Coolpix A900 | Olympus XZ-2 iHS |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2016-02-23 | 2012-12-18 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 |
Max resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 3968 x 2976 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Total focus points | - | 35 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-840mm (35.0x) | 28-112mm (4.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.4-6.9 | f/1.8-2.5 |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Tilting | Tilting |
Display diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Display resolution | 921k dots | 920k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 8 seconds | 60 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 7.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 6.00 m (at Auto ISO) | 8.60 m (ISO 800) |
Flash options | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 (30p, 25p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p, 25p) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 289g (0.64 pounds) | 346g (0.76 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 113 x 67 x 40mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.6") | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | 49 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 20.4 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 11.3 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 216 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 photos | 340 photos |
Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | EN-EL12 | Li-90B |
Self timer | Yes (2, 5, 10 secs) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | One | One |
Retail pricing | $400 | $450 |