Nikon A900 vs Panasonic FH2
88 Imaging
45 Features
58 Overall
50
96 Imaging
36 Features
33 Overall
34
Nikon A900 vs Panasonic FH2 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-840mm (F3.4-6.9) lens
- 289g - 113 x 67 x 40mm
- Launched February 2016
- Successor is Nikon A1000
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F3.1-6.5) lens
- 121g - 94 x 54 x 19mm
- Launched January 2011
- Other Name is Lumix DMC-FS16
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Nikon A900 vs Panasonic FH2 Overview
Here, we are reviewing the Nikon A900 vs Panasonic FH2, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Nikon and Panasonic. There exists a substantial gap among the sensor resolutions of the A900 (20MP) and FH2 (14MP) but both cameras provide the identical sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe A900 was launched 5 years after the FH2 which is a fairly big difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before diving right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a short view of how the A900 grades vs the FH2 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Nikon A900 vs Panasonic FH2 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Nikon Coolpix A900 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH2. The complete galleries are available at Nikon A900 Gallery & Panasonic FH2 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon A900 over the Panasonic FH2
| A900 | FH2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | February 2016 | January 2011 | More modern by 63 months | |
| Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
| Display size | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
| Display resolution | 921k | 230k | Sharper display (+691k dot) |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FH2 over the Nikon A900
| FH2 | A900 |
|---|
Common features in the Nikon A900 and Panasonic FH2
| A900 | FH2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | Lack of manual focus | |||
| Selfie screen | No selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly display | No Touch friendly display |
Nikon A900 vs Panasonic FH2 Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to carry around your camera frequently, you need to think about its weight and volume. The Nikon A900 has outer measurements of 113mm x 67mm x 40mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.6") having a weight of 289 grams (0.64 lbs) and the Panasonic FH2 has sizing of 94mm x 54mm x 19mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.7") with a weight of 121 grams (0.27 lbs).
Check out the Nikon A900 vs Panasonic FH2 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you use during that time. The following is a front view measurements comparison of the A900 vs the FH2.

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the A900 and FH2 is 88 and 96 respectively.
Nikon A900 vs Panasonic FH2 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is very difficult to visualize the gap in sensor sizes just by researching specs. The pic below might provide you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the A900 and FH2.
As you can plainly see, both of the cameras feature the identical sensor size but different megapixels. You can anticipate the Nikon A900 to provide you with extra detail utilizing its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also let you crop images way more aggressively. The younger A900 provides a benefit in sensor tech.
Nikon A900 vs Panasonic FH2 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Nikon A900 vs Panasonic FH2 Specifications
| Nikon Coolpix A900 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH2 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Nikon | Panasonic |
| Model | Nikon Coolpix A900 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH2 |
| Alternative name | - | Lumix DMC-FS16 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2016-02-23 | 2011-01-05 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | - | Venus Engine IV |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 20MP | 14MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 11 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-840mm (35.0x) | 28-112mm (4.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.4-6.9 | f/3.1-6.5 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Resolution of display | 921k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 8s | 60s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/1600s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 7.0 frames/s | 4.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 6.00 m (at Auto ISO) | 3.30 m |
| Flash settings | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 (30p, 25p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p, 25p) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 289g (0.64 pounds) | 121g (0.27 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 113 x 67 x 40mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.6") | 94 x 54 x 19mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 shots | 270 shots |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | EN-EL12 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2, 5, 10 secs) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Cost at launch | $400 | $149 |