Nikon A900 vs Panasonic FX75
88 Imaging
45 Features
58 Overall
50


94 Imaging
36 Features
32 Overall
34
Nikon A900 vs Panasonic FX75 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-840mm (F3.4-6.9) lens
- 289g - 113 x 67 x 40mm
- Launched February 2016
- Successor is Nikon A1000
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-120mm (F2.2-5.9) lens
- 165g - 103 x 55 x 23mm
- Introduced June 2010
- Also Known as Lumix DMC-FX70

Nikon A900 vs Panasonic FX75 Overview
Here, we will be matching up the Nikon A900 and Panasonic FX75, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Nikon and Panasonic. There exists a sizable gap among the sensor resolutions of the A900 (20MP) and FX75 (14MP) but both cameras have the identical sensor sizes (1/2.3").

The A900 was released 5 years later than the FX75 and that is a fairly significant difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before delving straight to a detailed comparison, here is a short overview of how the A900 matches up versus the FX75 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Nikon A900 vs Panasonic FX75 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Nikon Coolpix A900 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX75. The complete galleries are viewable at Nikon A900 Gallery & Panasonic FX75 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon A900 over the Panasonic FX75
A900 | FX75 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | February 2016 | ![]() | June 2010 | More recent by 70 months |
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 921k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer screen (+691k dot) |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FX75 over the Nikon A900
FX75 | A900 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Nikon A900 and Panasonic FX75
A900 | FX75 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | No manual focusing | ||
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither includes selfie screen |
Nikon A900 vs Panasonic FX75 Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to lug around your camera frequently, you'll need to take into account its weight and proportions. The Nikon A900 features outer dimensions of 113mm x 67mm x 40mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.6") having a weight of 289 grams (0.64 lbs) whilst the Panasonic FX75 has measurements of 103mm x 55mm x 23mm (4.1" x 2.2" x 0.9") and a weight of 165 grams (0.36 lbs).
See the Nikon A900 and Panasonic FX75 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you have chosen at that moment. The following is a front view scale comparison of the A900 vs the FX75.

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the A900 and FX75 is 88 and 94 respectively.

Nikon A900 vs Panasonic FX75 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, its tough to imagine the difference in sensor measurements simply by seeing a spec sheet. The visual here will give you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the A900 and FX75.
As you can see, the 2 cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit different MP. You can count on the Nikon A900 to produce greater detail as a result of its extra 6MP. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop photographs a good deal more aggressively. The fresher A900 should have an advantage in sensor tech.

Nikon A900 vs Panasonic FX75 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Nikon A900 vs Panasonic FX75 Specifications
Nikon Coolpix A900 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX75 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Nikon | Panasonic |
Model type | Nikon Coolpix A900 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX75 |
Also called | - | Lumix DMC-FX70 |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2016-02-23 | 2010-06-01 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | Venus Engine HD II |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4320 x 3240 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-840mm (35.0x) | 24-120mm (5.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.4-6.9 | f/2.2-5.9 |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | 3cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
Screen resolution | 921k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 8s | 60s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting rate | 7.0 frames per second | 2.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 6.00 m (at Auto ISO) | 7.40 m |
Flash settings | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 (30p, 25p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p, 25p) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1280x720 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | AVCHD Lite, Motion JPEG |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 289 gr (0.64 pounds) | 165 gr (0.36 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 113 x 67 x 40mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.6") | 103 x 55 x 23mm (4.1" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 photographs | - |
Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | EN-EL12 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2, 5, 10 secs) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Launch price | $400 | $139 |